Jump to content


Tech Tree Expansions


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Zinomov #1 Posted 07 March 2018 - 05:40 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18672 battles
  • 120
  • [DIGIN] DIGIN
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014

good day everyone,

 i decided to share with you some proposals for possible expansions to the in game tech trees that we have
currently i finnished the work with the soviet Tech Tree,

 

Right now i'm working on the german tech tree, i'll share it with you as soon as it is ready

and other tech trees won't be put aside don't worry, i'll send all my work here

 

waiting for your comments



Nishi_Kinuyo #2 Posted 07 March 2018 - 06:21 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 6977 battles
  • 3,468
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
How about no more rashan tanks then we already have in the game? :angry:

Dava_117 #3 Posted 07 March 2018 - 06:42 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17581 battles
  • 2,170
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
KV-13 is too strong for tier 5. And there should be a connection between IS and IS-2 IMO.

vasilinhorulezz #4 Posted 07 March 2018 - 06:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21150 battles
  • 866
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

+1 for effort,

but,

do we really need even more Russian tanks?


Edited by vasilinhorulezz, 07 March 2018 - 06:53 PM.


CptBarney #5 Posted 07 March 2018 - 07:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,914
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013
T-55a isn't needed and the ST-I and IS-4 need to be swapped.

NUKLEAR_SLUG #6 Posted 07 March 2018 - 07:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26618 battles
  • 1,610
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
T55A is German anyway..

MarcoStrapone #7 Posted 07 March 2018 - 07:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32542 battles
  • 707
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
you have no life, ha?

Jigabachi #8 Posted 07 March 2018 - 08:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17746 battles
  • 17,621
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

You could at least mark the ones you added. Apart from that, I'd say we really don't need any more boring copies - especially not Russian ones.

 

View PostMarcoStrapone, on 07 March 2018 - 07:41 PM, said:

you have no life, ha?

When your daily playtime is higher than his, you should be careful with statements like that...



Szatanshow #9 Posted 07 March 2018 - 08:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23169 battles
  • 284
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013
yeah like we totaly need more broken obj268 v- something ruining every game and killing tier 8 mm even more than its already is

arthurwellsley #10 Posted 07 March 2018 - 09:09 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 50480 battles
  • 2,506
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

(a) you cannot use the T55A or the STG in a tech tree as they are either a reward tank, or a premium tank,

(b) There are so many versions of the T54/T55 in real life that it would be possible to come up with an alternative to the T55A

(c.) You missed off the tier VII TD the KTTS which is in the game files but has never been released.

(d) If you look on the Chinese server run by Khong Zhong you can find other USSR tanks that are modelled in game, but are not sold on RU and EU.

KTTS

KRT-1

Object 244

Objects 268, 257, and 777

 

 



vasilinhorulezz #11 Posted 07 March 2018 - 09:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21150 battles
  • 866
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View Postarthurwellsley, on 07 March 2018 - 09:09 PM, said:

KRT-1

Object 244

Objects 268, 257, and 777

 

 



Thuis001 #12 Posted 07 March 2018 - 10:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5578 battles
  • 383
  • [-SBN-] -SBN-
  • Member since:
    05-29-2015
I like the effort that went into this, but I, along with A LOT of people think the Russian line is the last line that needs more tanks. (altough I think they should somewhat rework the branch concerning the older heavies) Neither does Germany really need more tanks (they need the Leo 1 line buffed first) altough again shuffeling some of the heavies might be nice. Either the UK or US lines would be good though, for example UK lights, French will be hard but perhaps a medium tank line somewhere in the future. And then you have the other, 1-2 line nations, yeah not much to do there.

AuroraBoreaIis #13 Posted 07 March 2018 - 11:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39163 battles
  • 544
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

Unlike some others I'm of the opinion we never can have too many Russian tanks, I would welcome them all. Russian designs are just cool. 

 

Some really interesting designs there, some I didn't even knew about. The 770 line looks great, and I really hope we get the 277 after the T-10. Awesome tank. 

 

Apart from the downtiering of some tanks (KV-13, 416), a well thought out tree and the effort is appreciated. STG isn't really likely as it's already a premium though.

 

Anyway, looking forward to what you cook up for other nations, especially Germans and Brits! :great:

 

 



MarcoStrapone #14 Posted 08 March 2018 - 02:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 32542 battles
  • 707
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostJigabachi, on 07 March 2018 - 07:22 PM, said:

You could at least mark the ones you added. Apart from that, I'd say we really don't need any more boring copies - especially not Russian ones.

 

When your daily playtime is higher than his, you should be careful with statements like that...

 

did i mention i have life? :B

leggasiini #15 Posted 08 March 2018 - 03:31 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9584 battles
  • 5,802
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

KV-13 is too strong for a tier 5, and IS and IS-2 being separate tanks doesnt make sense, unless you make the IS actual IS (and that is, with 85mm and "maybe" the 100 mm) and downtier that at tier 6. Object 416 is too strong for a tier 7, A-43 would powercreep the T-34, etc etc...

 

Also if you wanted, you could expand the Russian tree even further than this; I.E another turreted TD line (Object 120 Taran & friends), a KV-4 line, a line of Object 253 -> ST-I -> ST-II and then possibly the IS-4 getting its line as well, and lets not forget multi-turreted super-heavies.

 

I don't really have anything against adding them, but I would prefer if some other tech trees got focused first. French tree could expand a lot (pretty much at least one more line for all tank types; yes, a 3rd HT line is technically possible and that is not when you factor super-heavies), same for UK tree (AT least LTs, 2nd HT and 3rd TD lines), Japan can have at least 3 more lines (TD, arty and 2nd MT lines), or 4 if you use a lot of dark magic and implement the LT line, Sweden can also have a few more lines, then there is Swiss tree, etc etc...

 

View PostZinomov, on 07 March 2018 - 06:40 PM, said:

waiting for your comments

no



CptBarney #16 Posted 08 March 2018 - 05:36 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,914
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

we need to have competition of drawing and designing the next russian tanks.

 

lets start with the obj 1221 tier 12 TD armed with a 230mm gun.



Zinomov #17 Posted 10 March 2018 - 07:59 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18672 battles
  • 120
  • [DIGIN] DIGIN
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014

Germany Released

 


Edited by Zinomov, 10 March 2018 - 08:17 PM.


Nishi_Kinuyo #18 Posted 10 March 2018 - 09:48 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 6977 battles
  • 3,468
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Tiger III?

Is that some wehraboo's fake tank design, because I've never heard of it before.

Also, Tiger I would need a significant nerf to be suitable as tier 6; notably the removal of the long 8.8.

Pretty sure the E90 is also a fake.



lord_chipmonk #19 Posted 10 March 2018 - 10:15 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 32183 battles
  • 10,166
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 10 March 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

Tiger III?

 

I remember reading this designation before somewhere but can't for the life of me remember where. 



Nishi_Kinuyo #20 Posted 10 March 2018 - 11:18 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 6977 battles
  • 3,468
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View Postlord_chipmonk, on 10 March 2018 - 10:15 PM, said:

 

I remember reading this designation before somewhere but can't for the life of me remember where. 

The only references I can find to it have the tank also called either E-75 or E-90 (which we already know is fake).

So having both a Tiger III and the E-75 is redundant, assuming the latter ever was called as such.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users