Jump to content


is7 is out of date?


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

pudelikael #1 Posted 11 March 2018 - 08:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18927 battles
  • 645
  • [EESTI] EESTI
  • Member since:
    05-15-2015

very slow and can.t pen ob. 907 and other ruski medium tank. WG nerf very hard to is7???

old time was is7 playable, but now not anymore


Edited by GeneralBrezhnev, 11 March 2018 - 08:50 PM.


HugSeal #2 Posted 11 March 2018 - 08:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,010
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View PostGeneralBrezhnev, on 11 March 2018 - 08:46 PM, said:

very slow and can.t pen ob. 907 and other ruski medium tank. WG nerf very hard to is7???

old time was is7 playable, but now not anymore

 

Haha, nope.

Sfinski #3 Posted 11 March 2018 - 09:25 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30928 battles
  • 2,344
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Yeah, it's horrible. /s

Archaean #4 Posted 11 March 2018 - 09:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14990 battles
  • 1,167
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View PostGeneralBrezhnev, on 11 March 2018 - 08:46 PM, said:

very slow and can.t pen ob. 907 and other ruski medium tank. WG nerf very hard to is7???

old time was is7 playable, but now not anymore

 

It's not, now please get out of here!

View PostSfinski, on 11 March 2018 - 09:25 PM, said:

Yeah, it's horrible. /s

It could need a gun buff. Maybe fit it with the Obj 268 gun but with same reload as the current IS-7? Seems very reasonable if you ask me.

 


Edited by Archaean, 11 March 2018 - 09:29 PM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #5 Posted 11 March 2018 - 09:29 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27512 battles
  • 1,962
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
Considering how many have been rolling around ranked or it seems popular enough.

D4wiD3K #6 Posted 11 March 2018 - 09:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 659 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2012

haha lol op is clearly shooting ap. what a bob hahaha


Edited by D4wiD3K, 11 March 2018 - 09:31 PM.


Browarszky #7 Posted 11 March 2018 - 10:04 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 15962 battles
  • 3,518
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
I never really liked it to begin with, to be honest.

leggasiini #8 Posted 11 March 2018 - 10:10 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12328 battles
  • 6,069
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Not probably the most fun tank to play for many (I do kinda like it), but its definitely not bad.

 

There are a few HTs at tier 10 that certainly are inferior than the IS-7.



TheComfyChair #9 Posted 11 March 2018 - 10:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6790 battles
  • 684
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-20-2017

Easiest way to check if it's out of date is to turn it over and check the bottom of the chassis or have a look round the rim for the sell by date ;)



Strizi #10 Posted 11 March 2018 - 10:17 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34594 battles
  • 593
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
The last buff was already unnecessary and you think its out of date? LOL why cater even more to tomatoes and their beloved heavies.

baribal_80 #11 Posted 11 March 2018 - 10:17 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20882 battles
  • 233
  • Member since:
    02-27-2012

View Postleggasiini, on 11 March 2018 - 09:10 PM, said:

Not probably the most fun tank to play for many (I do kinda like it), but its definitely not bad.

 

There are a few HTs at tier 10 that certainly are inferior than the IS-7.

 

How a tank with best armor in the game, 490 alpha, good gun stats and great mobility is not fun to play? Just go to ppl that don't have derps, facehug them and profit. 

Schepel #12 Posted 11 March 2018 - 10:54 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 57334 battles
  • 3,005
  • Member since:
    05-13-2013
IS-7 is one of the best heavies in the game at the moment. Speed, armour and a hard-hitting gun. You may have to go full APCR, though. The AP shell is a bit... underwhelming in the current meta. :P

monthey_ #13 Posted 11 March 2018 - 11:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35584 battles
  • 658
  • [MAROC] MAROC
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011
Been playing IS-7 in Ranked with food and I must say, one of the best heavies in the game. Never been a great fan but now I am sold. Will take it oit more in Random battles now.

HundeWurst #14 Posted 11 March 2018 - 11:28 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67720 battles
  • 4,280
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

Compared to many other tanks the IS7 is OP.

 

The gunhandling is WAY to good for the armor and mobility it has.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #15 Posted 11 March 2018 - 11:32 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47700 battles
  • 1,381
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostWunderWurst, on 12 March 2018 - 12:28 AM, said:

Compared to many other tanks the IS7 is OP.

 

The gunhandling is WAY to good for the armor and mobility it has.

 

What other tanks? I know it isn't the worst and i know it's an excellent medium but what other tie 10 heavy is worse than this?

 

Edit: Sorry, i misread your post somehow. Sure, there're some worse tanks (and heavies) in tier 10 than the IS7.


Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 12 March 2018 - 12:38 AM.


Hertdegekke #16 Posted 11 March 2018 - 11:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22478 battles
  • 15
  • [-NARF] -NARF
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013
The tank is still quite capable. Just don't show your hull to a S Conq goldspamming in Ranked (;

MeNoobTank #17 Posted 12 March 2018 - 12:01 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10430 battles
  • 312
  • [R3L4X] R3L4X
  • Member since:
    02-16-2017

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 11 March 2018 - 11:32 PM, said:

 

What other tanks? I know it isn't the worst and i know it's an excellent medium but what other tie 10 heavy is worse than this?

well first of all IS-4 , this one is really out of date. It is slow, it has bad armor (good on paper), has bad gun (good on paper).

 

then all of the tanks that imo are worse than IS-7:

-113

-E100

-IS-4

-Kranvagn

-Object 260

-T57 Heavy

 

I only said the Heavy tanks and the ones that I tested as a fair comparison



Etre_ #18 Posted 12 March 2018 - 12:07 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50897 battles
  • 1,305
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014

View PostGeneralBrezhnev, on 11 March 2018 - 08:46 PM, said:

very slow and can.t pen ob. 907 and other ruski medium tank. WG nerf very hard to is7???

old time was is7 playable, but now not anymore

 

Is one of the tanks that works in ranked ... so no, is still decent.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #19 Posted 12 March 2018 - 12:18 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47700 battles
  • 1,381
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostMeNoobTank, on 12 March 2018 - 01:01 AM, said:

well first of all IS-4 , this one is really out of date. It is slow, it has bad armor (good on paper), has bad gun (good on paper).

 

then all of the tanks that imo are worse than IS-7:

-113

-E100

-IS-4

-Kranvagn

-Object 260

-T57 Heavy

 

I only said the Heavy tanks and the ones that I tested as a fair comparison

 

Agree with that except for the two autoloaders. Those two got magazines which puts them in a separate category. But what about the 5A, Maus, AMX 54, Type 5 or the S.Conqueror. Certainly those tanks are much better.

Etre_ #20 Posted 12 March 2018 - 12:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50897 battles
  • 1,305
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 12 March 2018 - 12:18 AM, said:

 

Agree with that except for the two autoloaders. Those two got magazines which puts them in a separate category. But what about the 5A, Maus, AMX 54, Type 5 or the S.Conqueror. Certainly those tanks are much better.

 

5A .... depends. Both tanks are fast but IS7 trades a better turret for a longer reload. 

Type 5 is a turd. Good for randoms to fight in towns. 

Maus the same.

S Conqueror is better for ridge lines, but not otherwise. 

 

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users