Jump to content


This suppose to be graphic from 2018? More like Cartoon 1.0


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

skero #1 Posted 23 March 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25863 battles
  • 606
  • [UNI_C] UNI_C
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011

It looks like Xbox conversion and more "plastic colorful" style than more realistic graphics. If you imagine swapping tanks for characters from WoW it would look like older cartoon RPG game.

 

The trees/bushes look all the same, cheap and generic. Put in place like in build mode in Sims. Overall maps are more flat and empty.

 

I can play it on ultra with most important settings with average graphic card and I can´t do that with really "realistic" graphics in games from 2017, or even 2016/15.

 

I don´t know why but I liked solid engine of pre 1.0 more. It was unique. Now it is really like playing console cartoon game. And that´s why performance is so well handled by even older graphics.

 

Yes, expacting really modern and more realistic adult graphic was silly of me. Most people who play Wot don´t have even average PC, especially in Russia. But business is business :child:

 

We were fooled perfectly.

 



Byggherren_Mars #2 Posted 23 March 2018 - 08:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9296 battles
  • 12
  • [RANGI] RANGI
  • Member since:
    06-08-2016
Found the person that has a crap computer ^ if you really don't like the new graphics you can go back to the old by pressing the "minimum" button in graphics settings ;)

Edited by Byggherren_Mars, 23 March 2018 - 08:51 PM.


Ceeb #3 Posted 23 March 2018 - 08:52 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30216 battles
  • 5,240
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
Graphics look cool in Ultra bud.... 

dimethylcadmium #4 Posted 23 March 2018 - 09:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6160 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017

View Postskero, on 23 March 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

expacting really modern and more realistic adult graphic was silly of me

 

 

:ohmy:

Edited by VMX, 24 March 2018 - 11:09 AM.


Browarszky #5 Posted 23 March 2018 - 09:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,723
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
No idea what it looks like with ultra. My maximum recommended settings are just below medium, I think.

Eaglax #6 Posted 23 March 2018 - 09:24 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18992 battles
  • 3,485
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

View Postskero, on 23 March 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

 

I can play it on ultra

 

I somehow doubt that..

Negativvv #7 Posted 23 March 2018 - 09:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8927 battles
  • 997
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

I quite like all the vivid colours... :hiding:

 

Although maybe they should have an "Enhanced" setting with all the extra fancy tracers and colours then a "Normal" setting which like pre 1.0 but with the nicer physics? Then again, some will still find fault...



jack_timber #8 Posted 23 March 2018 - 09:37 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 33432 battles
  • 2,069
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

Well you can't please them all. But for me it's great to play on ultra with only grass in sniper mode disabled.

 



Zenith #9 Posted 23 March 2018 - 09:50 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 4457 battles
  • 3,237
  • Member since:
    07-05-2010
Potato computers can only display potato graphics. 

Jigabachi #10 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,005
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postskero, on 23 March 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

more realistic adult graphic

Dude... the game is PEGI13. :confused:



SABAOTH #11 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:36 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 36793 battles
  • 2,914
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 23 March 2018 - 10:04 PM, said:

Dude... the game is PEGI13. :confused:

 

But e-peens are everywhere! :hiding:

250swb #12 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:41 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22585 battles
  • 5,047
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
I've got a potato PC compared to those bragged about by some people, but even I can run the game at 'Ultra' settings with 85fps. The only things I turned down or Off are those things I don't like, such as motion blur etc. Fantastic patch, well done WG!

Edited by 250swb, 23 March 2018 - 10:41 PM.


Unknown_Lifeform #13 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27425 battles
  • 507
  • Member since:
    12-11-2012

View PostNegativvv, on 23 March 2018 - 09:29 PM, said:

I quite like all the vivid colours... :hiding:

 

 

And for those that don't there are a number of filters you can apply for different effects, including softer colours. In fact, the annoying pop up informing me of this not going away until I'd played several games is my only real complaint so far.



vixu #14 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:46 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 42546 battles
  • 3,338
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
btw, potato graphics makes it easier to play.

AliceUnchained #15 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:51 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 38414 battles
  • 8,928
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

No clue what settings you're at currently, but my 1.0.0 version definitely looks better. Even when it's a matter of personal preference, what OP here presents is just sheer and utter nonsense. 



ThinGun #16 Posted 23 March 2018 - 10:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34962 battles
  • 1,250
  • [SHYLO] SHYLO
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014
Sounds to me like someone is whining because winning is going to be 3.45% more difficult now.

Spurtung #17 Posted 23 March 2018 - 11:17 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63581 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postskero, on 23 March 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

I can play it on ultra with most important settings with average graphic card and I can´t do that with really "realistic" graphics in games from 2017, or even 2016/15.

Prove it, post some screenshots.



Lord_Edge #18 Posted 23 March 2018 - 11:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5987 battles
  • 834
  • Member since:
    11-26-2016

View Postskero, on 23 March 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

It looks like Xbox conversion

 

Disable Antialiasing in the graphics options and it will look much better.  It uses a N64 style post processing blur effect instead of true AA.

OreH75 #19 Posted 23 March 2018 - 11:27 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47894 battles
  • 2,137
  • [RANGR] RANGR
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013

View Postskero, on 23 March 2018 - 08:48 PM, said:

It looks like Xbox conversion and more "plastic colorful" style than more realistic graphics. If you imagine swapping tanks for characters from WoW it would look like older cartoon RPG game.

 

The trees/bushes look all the same, cheap and generic. Put in place like in build mode in Sims. Overall maps are more flat and empty.

 

I can play it on ultra with most important settings with average graphic card and I can´t do that with really "realistic" graphics in games from 2017, or even 2016/15.

 

I don´t know why but I liked solid engine of pre 1.0 more. It was unique. Now it is really like playing console cartoon game. And that´s why performance is so well handled by even older graphics.

 

Yes, expacting really modern and more realistic adult graphic was silly of me. Most people who play Wot don´t have even average PC, especially in Russia. But business is business :child:

 

We were fooled perfectly.

 

 

Instead of complaining take a screenshot of your settings and an ingame screenshot and maybe we can suggest some stuf?



MadSlob #20 Posted 23 March 2018 - 11:55 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 25920 battles
  • 99
  • Member since:
    08-01-2010
crap pc guy...invest a little...on ultra the game looks real good:)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users