Jump to content


Update 1.0 which tanks are better or worse

Whats hot & whats not 1.0

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Edweird #1 Posted 25 March 2018 - 12:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9664 battles
  • 1,055
  • Member since:
    08-22-2017

We all know that the maps have changed and got flatter,

 

I have noticed that, some of my previously good tanks are now under performing in the new "meta" and other seem to be doing a lot better namely scout tanks.

 

For instance the Comet now is not as strong due to its reliance on gun depression.

 

My TOG nailed almost instantly after spawn, poor TOG

 

I re bought the type 64 and have been kinder to it this time feeding it a diet of gold ammo.We are friends again.

 

I'm taking a break from high tiers as they seem pretty unplayable at the moment.

 

I'm wondering if meds are suffering, or heavies as I tend to play lights and TD's recently and would appreciate any other's thoughts on

 

"Whats hot and whats not after 1.0"

 

:mellow:

 



TankkiPoju #2 Posted 25 March 2018 - 12:43 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20393 battles
  • 6,196
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

Every tank with poor gun depression is better. Like Russian tanks.

 

Who would have guessed.



Erwin_Von_Braun #3 Posted 25 March 2018 - 12:50 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostTankkiPoju, on 25 March 2018 - 11:43 AM, said:

Every tank with poor gun depression is better. Like Russian tanks.

 

Who would have guessed.

 

Is sir suggesting some kind of Russian bias? ;)

Erwin_Von_Braun #4 Posted 25 March 2018 - 12:55 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

On topic - quick scouts seem to be playing rather well & arty seems to be having an easier time of things.

Other than that, I couldn't really say.



Strizi #5 Posted 25 March 2018 - 12:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 36993 battles
  • 610
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
Every TD/Med with bad armor but good gun got more firing lanes now i think. Maybe an indirect buff for Leopard 1 :trollface::bajan: because a direct buff would make it op as we all know!

Edited by Strizi, 25 March 2018 - 12:58 PM.


Edweird #6 Posted 25 March 2018 - 01:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9664 battles
  • 1,055
  • Member since:
    08-22-2017

View PostStrizi, on 25 March 2018 - 11:57 AM, said:

Every TD/Med with bad armor but good gun got more firing lanes now i think. Maybe an indirect buff for Leopard 1 :trollface::bajan: because a direct buff would make it op as we all know!

 

Weird, maybe its why i actually started winning games in my STB-1 which is pretty much the same pile of junk that the leopard....

MeNoobTank #7 Posted 25 March 2018 - 01:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11481 battles
  • 390
  • [R3L4X] R3L4X
  • Member since:
    02-16-2017
all tanks are still worse than Obj 268 v4

TankkiPoju #8 Posted 25 March 2018 - 03:55 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20393 battles
  • 6,196
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostErwin_Von_Braun, on 25 March 2018 - 12:50 PM, said:

 

Is sir suggesting some kind of Russian bias? ;)

 

I dunno man.

 

It's just that every time WG changes something drastic about the game, Russian tanks seem to kind of benefit :harp:

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users