Jump to content


is there any chance to get it


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

MarcoStrapone #1 Posted 27 March 2018 - 08:55 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35373 battles
  • 716
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
shot_071.jpgshot_072.jpg

Baldrickk #2 Posted 27 March 2018 - 08:55 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29909 battles
  • 14,117
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013

Huh? What?

 

They say a picture paints a thousand words, but really it adds context, to in this case non-existent content. 

 

Also if you were to complain about anyone, it should be the 0 damage UDES not a bottom tier platoon who came mid-table


Edited by Baldrickk, 27 March 2018 - 08:58 AM.


OreH75 #3 Posted 27 March 2018 - 08:59 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47465 battles
  • 2,101
  • [RANGR] RANGR
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013

View PostBaldrickk, on 27 March 2018 - 08:55 AM, said:

Huh? What?

 

He had a platoon that didnt perform well on his team so he lost a game while statspadding in the type 64...

Edited by OreH75, 27 March 2018 - 08:59 AM.


MarcoStrapone #4 Posted 27 March 2018 - 09:06 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35373 battles
  • 716
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostOreH75, on 27 March 2018 - 07:59 AM, said:

 

He had a platoon that didnt perform well on his team so he lost a game while statspadding in the type 64...

 

and? its happen all the time.

platoon take 3 places in the team, its 20% from the team.

why i need to suffer when platoon destroy the fun of battle.



TheWarrener #5 Posted 27 March 2018 - 09:09 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2924 battles
  • 340
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

View PostOreH75, on 27 March 2018 - 08:59 AM, said:

 

He had a platoon that didnt perform well on his team so he lost a game while statspadding in the type 64...

 

Why would anyone statpad in t64 when t34-85m is a superior tank and has lower requirements due to amount of bots who own it

Simeon85 #6 Posted 27 March 2018 - 09:12 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,766
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013
They are a bottom tier platoon as well, why would you complain about some tier 6s not doing great in game when you had a tier 8 do nothing? 

MarcoStrapone #7 Posted 27 March 2018 - 09:18 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35373 battles
  • 716
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostTheWarrener, on 27 March 2018 - 08:09 AM, said:

 

Why would anyone statpad in t64 when t34-85m is a superior tank and has lower requirements due to amount of bots who own it

 

this is not the case.

i really dont want to enter the battle with 20%  (sometime its two platoons so it can get 40% from the team) its not fun when they get killed in the first minutes of the battle.



L3gionaire #8 Posted 27 March 2018 - 09:29 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18577 battles
  • 140
  • [ADUK] ADUK
  • Member since:
    03-09-2014

View PostMarcoStrapone, on 27 March 2018 - 09:55 AM, said:

shot_071.jpgshot_072.jpg

 

Hah

What ?

Will never happened. You want to inluence MM formulas by adding an option in your settings ? Hah.

By the way, you're in a clan as I see. What do you do there ?

Don't you platoon ?

 



Sirebellus #9 Posted 27 March 2018 - 10:23 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18735 battles
  • 531
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
I would be happy if it was so, I have long held that playing a 'Random' game should be just that, not 15 random players against 12 randoms and 3 players working together with clanmates using teamspeak to organise movement, firing and targetting.

Random means random... not prepackaged platoons

Temid23 #10 Posted 27 March 2018 - 10:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 52683 battles
  • 684
  • [G-STR] G-STR
  • Member since:
    12-20-2013

I honestly can confirm there is no chance to get what the hell is this topic about.

 

Did i get it? :hiding:



Dava_117 #11 Posted 27 March 2018 - 10:29 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19076 battles
  • 3,123
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

LOL, first person I see whining about platoon! :teethhappy:



unhappy_bunny #12 Posted 27 March 2018 - 10:34 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 17997 battles
  • 2,564
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

Had they played a blinder, farmed lots of dmg and kills, won BIA, and won the battle for you, would you have come here to complain? 

 



Browarszky #13 Posted 27 March 2018 - 11:08 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,669
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
Just what does 'Disable pre-platoon' mean?:confused:

Ceeb #14 Posted 27 March 2018 - 11:20 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30126 battles
  • 5,190
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
Why did you block out your own damage?  

TankkiPoju #15 Posted 27 March 2018 - 11:48 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20087 battles
  • 6,192
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostTheWarrener, on 27 March 2018 - 09:09 AM, said:

 

Why would anyone statpad in t64 when t34-85m is a superior tank and has lower requirements due to amount of bots who own it

 

Because T-34-85M is so filthyOP, it makes me want to bleach myself clean every time I play it. Which isn't very often.

 

Type 64 at least requires some skill.

 



Browarszky #16 Posted 27 March 2018 - 11:52 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,669
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostTankkiPoju, on 27 March 2018 - 10:48 AM, said:

 

Because T-34-85M is so filthyOP, it makes me want to bleach myself clean every time I play it. Which isn't very often.

 

Type 64 at least requires some skill.

 

 

T-34-85M doesn't?...oh...:(

Simeon85 #17 Posted 27 March 2018 - 11:59 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,766
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View PostBrowarszky, on 27 March 2018 - 11:08 AM, said:

Just what does 'Disable pre-platoon' mean?:confused:

 

He means he wants an option to disable playing with or against platoons, so basically everyone in game would be a solo player.

 

He's just used a terrible example to highlight what he means.



Geno1isme #18 Posted 27 March 2018 - 12:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42029 battles
  • 7,536
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostSimeon85, on 27 March 2018 - 12:59 PM, said:

He means he wants an option to disable playing with or against platoons, so basically everyone in game would be a solo player.

 

He's just used a terrible example to highlight what he means.

 

Sounds like he wants to play ranked :coin:

Browarszky #19 Posted 27 March 2018 - 12:07 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,669
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostSimeon85, on 27 March 2018 - 10:59 AM, said:

 

He means he wants an option to disable playing with or against platoons, so basically everyone in game would be a solo player.

 

He's just used a terrible example to highlight what he means.

 

Got it, cheers! :great:

Dr_ownape #20 Posted 27 March 2018 - 12:11 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 42649 battles
  • 5,426
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 27 March 2018 - 09:34 AM, said:

Had they played a blinder, farmed lots of dmg and kills, won BIA, and won the battle for you, would you have come here to complain?

 

 

 

He would probably complain that they stole his damage/kills as they can communicate so it's unfair because he can't:hiding:






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users