Jump to content


Next after T-10!

tech-tree update

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

YobTvoyuMaty #1 Posted 27 March 2018 - 03:29 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 27546 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    02-17-2013

Russian experienced heavy tank Object 770

In 1956, the main Russian Army Tank-Automotive Directorate has developed new tactical and technical requirements for the weary tanks. On this basis, three of Leningrad and Chelyabinsk design team began almost on a competitive basis to develop a new languid tank, which had to change tank T-10. In the middle of "contestants" and was a heavy tank "to 770". This machine developed in KB Chelyabinsk tractor plant running Isakov PP — Head designer. The new heavy tank was code — "to 770". This machine, unlike rivals, was created "from scratch" only on the basis of new units with the introduction of promising design solutions. Armed with tanks was not accepted and it was done in a single experimental models.
 

Grievous tank "Object 770" had a traditional assembly of the usual placement in the fighting compartment 3 crew members. The corresponding feature and a new technical solution was cast housing, board which differed differentiated by length and width of your height. Inclined part bead had a variable slope angle (64 to 70 degrees) and a variable thickness (65-84 mm). A similar approach was used in the booking forehead body. The frontal armor was able to withstand the ingress of 122-mm armor-piercing projectile from a distance of 200 meters at all angles of fire. The thickness of the upper front part having a tilt angle of 60 degrees was 138 mm. The highest part of the sides of the hull had a thickness of 105 mm. To improve the armor protection edges around the perimeter of the case carried shoulder. Tower, as the body of the tank, was cast, with variable angles and wide walls, which in the end parts up to 290 mm (angle — 30 degrees). The joint body of the tower and defended. For mounting an optical rangefinder sight frontal part of the tower expanded and extended to the stern of the automatic loading mechanism.

Armament experimental tank "Object 770 "consisted of a 130-mm gun M-65 and 14.5-mm machine gun KPVT paired with it. Dual-equipped with plane stabilizer "The Storm", also mechanized combat pack with electro-rammer, which provided the rate of 5-7 rounds / min and automatic guidance system. I Gunner had rangefinder sight TPD-2C, night and day observation and sighting devices (night sight TPN). Gun ammunition consisted of 37 shots, 18 of which were located in a tower in the loading mechanism. Ammunition of the gun — 250 rounds of ammunition.

Motor installation languid experimental tank "Object 770" was developed under the Chudakov VD based on the diesel engine-2. 10-cylinder, two-row, four-row diesel DST-10 with the cooling water, supercharged by a compressor and a vertical arrangement of the cylinders installed in the aft perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tank. Motor power was 1,000 hp at 2500 rev / min. Motor power "Object 770" on the tests at 2500 rev / min was 1000 hp The engine was connected to the two-stream hydro mechanical gearbox, planetary gearbox and torque converter and all-encompassing. Torque Converter with 2 diffusers in power circuit box was included in parallel. The box provides 3 assists Front (one manual and two hydro) and a mechanical reverse gear. The peculiarity of the box and it was possible to start the drive motor from the tug, as the embodiment of engine braking (the inclusion of first gear and reverse). Motion control of the tank was made with the help of steering the motorcycle type.

In the chassis used hydropneumatic suspension, tracks open iron hinge and hydraulic track adjusters, on each side of each accounted for 6 road wheels with large diameter internal cushioning. The drive wheel with removable gear rings was taken back. Design feature of the caterpillar drive was the lack of support rollers.

The crew — 4 people. "Object 770" was equipped with anti-nuclear defense, laying system, fire alarms, directional gyro, bedside devices, and a heating system crew compartment. Outside communication was performed using the R-113 radio station, inside — tank intercom P-120.

Experienced heavy tank "Object 770" performed at the highest technical level. Alloy case and tower, having a pronounced differential reservation, provided the overcharge snaryadostoykost. The tank has good maneuverability characteristics and simply managed. Experts at the landfill, where the tests were all 3 experienced languid tanks, considered the "Object 770" is more promising. Now an experienced model of the machine on display at the Museum Kubinka armored vehicles.

The performance properties of the most experienced languid tank "Object 770":
Combat weight — 55 tons;
Crew — 4 people "
Overall dimensions 
Length with gun forward — 11333 mm;
Housing length — 728 mm;
Housing width 3400 mm
Height — 2420 mm;
Ground clearance — 430 mm;
Booking 
Armor type — cast, steel;
Reservation:
Forehead housing (top) — 138 mm (60 hail.) / 110 mm (66 deg.) / 85 mm (71 deg.)
Forehead body (bottom) — 187 mm (42 deg.) / 156 mm (51 deg.)
Board housing (top) — 86 mm (67 deg.)
Board housing (bottom) — 105 mm (0 deg.)
The forehead of the tower — 260 mm (30 deg.) / 184 mm (50 deg.) / 90 mm (70 deg.)
Board tower — 208 mm (35 deg.) / 152 mm (50 deg.) / 80 mm (70 deg.)
Armament:
Mark and caliber gun — M-65, 130 mm;
Type of gun — rifled;
Barrel length — 59 gauge;
Gun ammunition 37 
TDPS Scopes, TPN-1 
Machine gun — KPVT 14.5mm;
Engine — diesel DST-10 supercharged;
The maximum capacity of 1000 hp (735 kW);
Most road speed — 55 km / h;
In store down the highway — 300 km;
Overcoming obstacles:
— rise — 35 degrees.;
— ford — 1.0 m



K_A #2 Posted 27 March 2018 - 03:36 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13567 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
We've had Object 777 in the game files for like 3-4 years already. All speculation and hearsay, no real info from anywhere.

IncandescentGerbil #3 Posted 27 March 2018 - 03:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35597 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
It'll have a 2000hp engine and run on vodka. It will be totally legit, because some Russian dude has "data" to confirm it.

NUKLEAR_SLUG #4 Posted 27 March 2018 - 05:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26628 battles
  • 1,626
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View PostK_A, on 27 March 2018 - 03:36 PM, said:

We've had Object 777 in the game files for like 3-4 years already. All speculation and hearsay, no real info from anywhere.

 

One of the guns on the T-10 if you mouse over the ammo compatability screen it lists the Obj-777 as one of the tanks that can mount it.

 



Palora #5 Posted 27 March 2018 - 05:45 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 23433 battles
  • 415
  • [ROCOM] ROCOM
  • Member since:
    03-17-2010
 Who cares, it's going to be OP or close enough :D 
Better start grinding for it now. 

Spurtung #6 Posted 28 March 2018 - 12:07 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60179 battles
  • 5,532
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostPalora, on 27 March 2018 - 06:45 PM, said:

 Who cares, it's going to be OP or close enough :D 
Better start grinding for it now. 

 

Got 182.296 XP already grinded in it.

181.397XP on the Obj. 430 II.

 

 

So...I guess I'm waiting for both.



Lord_Edge #7 Posted 28 March 2018 - 09:01 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5757 battles
  • 742
  • Member since:
    11-26-2016
Would prefer it if T-10 was their tier IX and T-10M was the tier X, no real need for more objects.

leggasiini #8 Posted 28 March 2018 - 10:00 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9678 battles
  • 5,828
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

I think this thing is more likely tier X after the T-10:

 

Spoiler

 

More similar visually, has frontal mounted turret like the T-10, and in general is literally a T-10 on steroids, while the Object 770 is bit different.

 

I doubt that its the Object 777 II, because if it was that, then why would it take them ages to put it as a tier X after the T-10? Besides, it is not really exactly super similar to the T-10, anyway.



Bad_Mojo_incoming #9 Posted 28 March 2018 - 10:07 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19397 battles
  • 199
  • [THIK] THIK
  • Member since:
    03-06-2014

Ah, HELL NO, you are NOT gonna make me sit back in the T-10.

I know it's probably my fault that I just couldn't make it work for me, still, no way...



PoIestar #10 Posted 28 March 2018 - 05:41 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 30845 battles
  • 3,957
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View Postleggasiini, on 28 March 2018 - 10:00 AM, said:

because if it was that, then why would it take them ages to put it as a tier X after the T-10? 

The line was fine, the T-10 was a bit of a controversial one to put between the IS-3 and IS-7 I agree, but it's a great and largely similar tank now. 

I think switching the T-10 over to another line became a problem for the tank that needs to fill the gap between the IS-3 and IS-7. The Object 257 has been introduced to the supertest a while back now, but it took them pretty long to implement it into a line.

I think it's the 257 that made them make this decision. It would explain why they didn't want the T-10 to go, but introduce it into a different line. I don't necessarily think it's better this way, because I hate the 257 as a tank and as an idea, and the T-10 is an absolutely amazing tank and while it's an odd one compared to the rather straight forward IS-3 and IS-7, it's rewarding to spend effort into discovering the T-10.



AuroraBoreaIis #11 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39230 battles
  • 544
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

View Postleggasiini, on 28 March 2018 - 10:00 AM, said:

I think this thing is more likely tier X after the T-10:

 

Spoiler

 

More similar visually, has frontal mounted turret like the T-10, and in general is literally a T-10 on steroids, while the Object 770 is bit different.

 

I doubt that its the Object 777 II, because if it was that, then why would it take them ages to put it as a tier X after the T-10? Besides, it is not really exactly super similar to the T-10, anyway.

 

Agreed, I hope it's the Object 277 too. It looks great and T-10 gameplay on steroids sounds very appealing (similar mobility but with a 130mm gun and more - but not OP - armor). 

 

The Object 777 would not make any sense imo, in that case the IS-7 still would have been better. It looks weird and is essentially a slightly different IS-4. It would be the lame and too easy choice (so not completely unlikely sadly...)



Afdass #12 Posted 29 March 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12332 battles
  • 627
  • Member since:
    07-26-2016
As long as it has similar stuff and gameplay to the T-10, I take it. I always enjoy taking the tank for a spin once or twice a day and it usually doesn't disappoint.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users