Jump to content


Global Map Season 7 Recap


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 28 March 2018 - 01:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,087
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Let's take a look at some of the statistics of the season.

The full text of the news item

StinkyStonky #2 Posted 28 March 2018 - 01:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24424 battles
  • 1,544
  • [H5VOC] H5VOC
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

Not sure how we managed to finish as Veterans at Tier 10, but we did and the two camos are nice.

 

It would be nice if the Ratings table also showed how much gold each clan won.  I suspect it's not on there because it would show how little most of the clans get.



Norstein_Bekker #3 Posted 28 March 2018 - 02:03 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 18910 battles
  • 4,244
  • [CR0WS] CR0WS
  • Member since:
    11-22-2013

Block Quote

 I suspect it's not on there because it would show how little most of the clans get.

 

And here comes the ...

 

GIB REWARDS TO EVERYONE PARTICIPATING AND NOT WINNING ! 


Edited by NickMustaine, 29 March 2018 - 01:05 PM.
Text format not allowed


FireflyDivision #4 Posted 28 March 2018 - 02:05 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23531 battles
  • 3,753
  • [RANGI] RANGI
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View PostStinkyStonky, on 28 March 2018 - 01:56 PM, said:

Not sure how we managed to finish as Veterans at Tier 10, but we did and the two camos are nice.

 

It would be nice if the Ratings table also showed how much gold each clan won.  I suspect it's not on there because it would show how little most of the clans get.

 

Were you aware of the fact that you need to play the game in order to be eligible for the gold rewards?

Corruption_Clan #5 Posted 28 March 2018 - 05:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43511 battles
  • 589
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

Didn't participate this season.

 

Hopefully next time I can :)



FireflyDivision #6 Posted 28 March 2018 - 07:27 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23531 battles
  • 3,753
  • [RANGI] RANGI
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View PostCorruption_Clan, on 28 March 2018 - 05:06 PM, said:

Didn't participate this season.

 

Hopefully next time I can :)

 

Hope so :) the more players, the better

I also see that your current clan is quite active when it comes to random battles, so i'm sure people want to spare 15 minutes for a cw battle. 



WindSplitter1 #7 Posted 28 March 2018 - 09:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13601 battles
  • 1,628
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016
Next season when?

Simona2k #8 Posted 29 March 2018 - 11:38 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1224 battles
  • 65
  • [GGLT] GGLT
  • Member since:
    10-01-2017
Good Luck

WunderWurst #9 Posted 29 March 2018 - 12:59 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67471 battles
  • 4,114
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostWindSplitter1, on 28 March 2018 - 09:17 PM, said:

Next season when?

 

Well from what I can tell is the following:

SO WG tried to reduce the gold income from CWs at some point (last year I guess). Who would have thought, but that did not end the way it was supposed to end. People were complaining, most likely there was a noticable drop in activity.

 

Now they moved on to another strategy. Instead of halfing the gold income from the global map they decided to half the time this gold can be earned: Players wont complain nearly as much, while less gold is given out for free.

 

In that light expect a break for roughly 6 weeks or 1.5 month, or with other words: A break for the same timeframe the last season was running.



StinkyStonky #10 Posted 29 March 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24424 battles
  • 1,544
  • [H5VOC] H5VOC
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

View PostNorstein_Bekker, on 28 March 2018 - 01:03 PM, said:

And here comes the ...

GIB REWARDS TO EVERYONE PARTICIPATING AND NOT WINNING ! 

View PostFireflyDivision, on 28 March 2018 - 01:05 PM, said:

Were you aware of the fact that you need to play the game in order to be eligible for the gold rewards?

 

We finished as Veterans for both Tier 10 and Tier 8 so everyone got 2 camos .... which is also where NOOT and CRY-X finished so ...

What I asked for is transparency.  If/When people complain about the gold they received (or didn't), I'd like to be able to judge whether it's a legitimate complaint, just moaning or just greed and over entitlement.

 

View PostFireflyDivision, on 28 March 2018 - 06:27 PM, said:

Hope so :) the more players, the better

I'm just curious ... do you think more players would be attracted by more gold for the best clans or more gold for majority of clans ?

 

View PostWunderWurst, on 29 March 2018 - 11:59 AM, said:

WG tried to reduce the gold income from CWs at some point (last year I guess). Who would have thought, but that did not end the way it was supposed to end. People were complaining, most likely there was a noticable drop in activity.

 

H5 won the most gold we've ever won (roughly double the previous season) but from a gold PoV it's not worth it.

It addition to seeing how much gold each clan won, I think it would also be good to see how many days a clan participated and how many battles they fought, how many lands they won, how many days they held land, how many times they lost the land they held, how many players fought (5+) battles, etc.

For someone who likes stats, they would all be interesting.

 



vcristi #11 Posted 29 March 2018 - 07:42 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 63413 battles
  • 174
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011

View PostStinkyStonky, on 29 March 2018 - 01:49 PM, said:

 

I'm just curious ... do you think more players would be attracted by more gold for the best clans or more gold for majority of clans ?

 

 

 

No, more people would be attracted by more gold for all clans.

You have a funny way to classify the clans:

1. good ones

2. 'majority' ones

......:amazed::facepalm:

 

Or by 'majority' you mean the bad clans with tomato players? Why should those who perform worst get more than those who are good???? 

 

On topic: Why there are so many breaks? CW is running lately just half of the time.... I like how WG talks about more end game content but they stop CW a lot.



WindSplitter1 #12 Posted 29 March 2018 - 08:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13601 battles
  • 1,628
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostWunderWurst, on 29 March 2018 - 11:59 AM, said:

 

Well from what I can tell is the following:

SO WG tried to reduce the gold income from CWs at some point (last year I guess). Who would have thought, but that did not end the way it was supposed to end. People were complaining, most likely there was a noticable drop in activity.

 

Now they moved on to another strategy. Instead of halfing the gold income from the global map they decided to half the time this gold can be earned: Players wont complain nearly as much, while less gold is given out for free.

 

In that light expect a break for roughly 6 weeks or 1.5 month, or with other words: A break for the same timeframe the last season was running.

 

Quite clever indeed. But otherwise ridiculous!

 

What's the point of Clans in the first place if we don't get to have a competitive mode for them more times than we do? :facepalm:

 

Just typical of WG...



WunderWurst #13 Posted 29 March 2018 - 09:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67471 battles
  • 4,114
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostWindSplitter1, on 29 March 2018 - 08:18 PM, said:

 

Quite clever indeed. But otherwise ridiculous!

 

What's the point of Clans in the first place if we don't get to have a competitive mode for them more times than we do? :facepalm:

 

Just typical of WG...

 

I mean its just guessing but to be honest what other reason is there? I cannot come up with any other.

But maybe some WG employee will join in and tell us the reason. That would be refreshing for a change.



Norstein_Bekker #14 Posted 29 March 2018 - 11:49 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 18910 battles
  • 4,244
  • [CR0WS] CR0WS
  • Member since:
    11-22-2013

Block Quote

 I'm just curious ... do you think more players would be attracted by more gold for the best clans or more gold for majority of clans ?

 

I do remember a season where you had to spam landings to get golds so the "majority" can have his "share" without having to hold provinces on Global Map. Why did they removed it ? Because big clans cried or because it was one of the *edited* CW season ? Don't bother answering, I think I already know your answer :]


Edited by NickMustaine, 02 April 2018 - 01:23 PM.
Inappropriate language


__Magmaa #15 Posted 30 March 2018 - 08:45 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30027 battles
  • 13
  • [S1MP] S1MP
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013
Competativness of this game never was priority, neither will be, sadly.... Anyway enjoy 2 months break, for clans that couldn't earn enough gold for premium days, prepare your bucks :) wierd how that works right?

Edited by __Magmaa, 30 March 2018 - 08:46 AM.


Negativvv #16 Posted 30 March 2018 - 11:55 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6207 battles
  • 567
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

Lel wrong thread...


Edited by Negativvv, 30 March 2018 - 12:41 PM.


SCOLANATOR #17 Posted 30 March 2018 - 02:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 20252 battles
  • 162
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    09-15-2010

View PostStinkyStonky, on 28 March 2018 - 12:56 PM, said:

Not sure how we managed to finish as Veterans at Tier 10, but we did and the two camos are nice.

 

It would be nice if the Ratings table also showed how much gold each clan won.  I suspect it's not on there because it would show how little most of the clans get.

 

Got to agree with FAME on this one, if you want gold then come and get it. But really, you're not good enough and just want your participation medal like the fat kid on school sports day. Everyone has the same opportunity to capture whatever province they want but instead they'd rather complain on the forums.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users