Jump to content


Petition: Nerf the Obj 268 V4 with the next patch


  • Please log in to reply
280 replies to this topic

HundeWurst #1 Posted 28 March 2018 - 02:54 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 70100 battles
  • 4,359
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

*
POPULAR

#singed

 

If you want to join that is :). That tank is ruining every gamemode it can be picked. Randoms, skirmishes and advances suffer so hard from its existence.



Search_Warrant #2 Posted 28 March 2018 - 02:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27235 battles
  • 6,326
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

This and also nerf the 430U armor/gun its too god dam strong and straight upgrade from 121.

 

268V4 100mm pixel lower-lower front plate is a sick joke for a weak spot. its a god dam TD not a superheavy. it reverses faster than some light tanks.


Edited by Search_Warrant, 28 March 2018 - 02:57 PM.


Ziurawka #3 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:04 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21743 battles
  • 439
  • [NLUFA] NLUFA
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015

But guys, they're just about to release the T-10 and 430 II successors ... 

I strongly believe 268v4 will be balanced in comparison :) 



VarzA #4 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:05 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21682 battles
  • 1,462
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    06-17-2011

View PostWunderWurst, on 28 March 2018 - 02:54 PM, said:

#singed

 

If you want to join that is :). That tank is ruining every gamemode it can be picked. Randoms, skirmishes and advances suffer so hard from its existence.

 

I would love for this to happen, and for the 430/430U to be dealt with as well .... but what makes you think that a petition on the EU server will have any bearing ?

 

We are cash-cow whiners to these ppl.


Edited by VarzA, 28 March 2018 - 03:06 PM.


Cobra6 #5 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:06 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,826
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Signed, this tank is incredibly badly balanced.

Quite literally the only drawback it has is that it turns slow.

 

It has very strong armour, great speed for the amount of armour it has, a solid gun that is suited from close/mid range snapshots, all in all for World of Corridors it's too powerful.

 

Average damage blocked in E-100: 1400

Average damage blocked in IS-7: 1500

Average damage blocked in 268v4: 1800 (playing like a complete idiot being overly aggressive and overextending quite a lot just to see how balanced it was)

Average damage blocked in IS-4: 2500

268V4 is not a bad heavy tank if you ask me........oh wait........it isn't......

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 28 March 2018 - 03:23 PM.


doriansky1 #6 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:06 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29746 battles
  • 229
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 28 March 2018 - 02:57 PM, said:

This and also nerf the 430U armor/gun its too god dam strong and straight upgrade from 121.

 

268V4 100mm pixel lower-lower front plate is a sick joke for a weak spot. its a god dam TD not a superheavy. it reverses faster than some light tanks.

 Tbh i never tried to shoot the lower-lower upper front plate, or whatever that is :) . I always go for the 250mm cupola, which is more or less pixel snipe since you have to hit exactly the center (the armor on the cupola extremities is not modeled).

The mobility however, it's just retarded. Perhaps there is another english word to describe a 75t tank bombing around with 20p/w ratio. So i'm up for it, nerf the engine power to 1000HP , make the mobility like a T100E3.



Meanwhile in Russia : "A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible"
 

signal11th #7 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:23 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 37619 battles
  • 5,777
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
430 is fine "alterations" need to definately be done on the 268-4 and 430u... signed.

Shaade_Silentpaw #8 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:24 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23070 battles
  • 420
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

I'd be happy if they just reduce the larger lower plate to about 250mm effective and reduce the hp/ton to something realisitc.



Troubledove #9 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:27 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 42931 battles
  • 2,367
  • [METAL] METAL
  • Member since:
    09-07-2011
268 v4 deff needs something ... Remove the cupola weakspot, add 10deg/sec traverse and then nerf it by taking 70m off the viewrange.

Stronker heat also adviced. Type 5 heavies still bounxe a bit.

The_Georgian_One #10 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37173 battles
  • 1,640
  • [KOFN] KOFN
  • Member since:
    01-05-2015
Signed. I just hope they will not make it utter garbage. They took my 263 and replaced it with this abomination, I just hope they will not nerf it to the ground, cause the only consollation was that the new tier 10 is actually usable.

Rati_Festa #11 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 43628 battles
  • 1,503
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012
Signed.

Balc0ra #12 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:41 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66549 battles
  • 16,589
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
To be fair, there are more annoying tier X TD's hull down then this with more cupola armor even. Tho this is even trolling you in the open at times unless you have a perfect angle on the 2nd lower plate. So it still needs a slap on the wrist. Even a mobility nerf or top speed nerf would help. The reverse speed is even silly vs other tanks with more or less the same armor.

Edited by Balc0ra, 28 March 2018 - 03:43 PM.


Dava_117 #13 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:55 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19834 battles
  • 3,459
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postdoriansky1, on 28 March 2018 - 03:06 PM, said:

 Tbh i never tried to shoot the lower-lower upper front plate, or whatever that is :) . I always go for the 250mm cupola, which is more or less pixel snipe since you have to hit exactly the center (the armor on the cupola extremities is not modeled).

The mobility however, it's just retarded. Perhaps there is another english word to describe a 75t tank bombing around with 20p/w ratio. So i'm up for it, nerf the engine power to 1000HP , make the mobility like a T100E3.

 

I instead usually facehug it, shooting down on the UFP. Every shell smoothly go in there. The only problem is that is hard to perform and sometime he can reverse faster than your tank...

 

So yes

#signed



Search_Warrant #14 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:08 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27235 battles
  • 6,326
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostShaade_Silentpaw, on 28 March 2018 - 02:24 PM, said:

I'd be happy if they just reduce the larger lower plate to about 250mm effective and reduce the hp/ton to something realisitc.

 

Why should it get armor of a Type4? it shouldent get that kind of armor at all, ever, its too dam fast. let me know when you see Type4 going 55+ forwards please then it can have 250 LFP.

Edited by Search_Warrant, 28 March 2018 - 04:08 PM.


vonadnan #15 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:10 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 27217 battles
  • 54
  • [4XIS] 4XIS
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012
Signed, it needs to loose something, armor or mobility, whatever they choose, IF they choose to..and 430u too,lfp little bit

BKatt #16 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:12 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33238 battles
  • 466
  • [-LYNX] -LYNX
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013
*edited*

Edited by Daxeno, 29 March 2018 - 11:45 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to political remarks.


Junglist_ #17 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:14 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37417 battles
  • 1,352
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013
Signed. 

VarzA #18 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21682 battles
  • 1,462
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    06-17-2011

View Postsignal11th, on 28 March 2018 - 03:23 PM, said:

430 is fine "alterations" need to definately be done on the 268-4 and 430u... signed.

 

In what world, is that level of hp on a trade tank (and not a DPM tank) is fine ?

Or ... that level of a stock grind, when the direct competitor (WZ-120) is born out of hell ?



ihateclowns #19 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:27 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31703 battles
  • 256
  • [TROP] TROP
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
obj 268 4 is fine you guys just need to learn how to deal with it, its not just a regular point and click tank you actually have to know where to shoot it. Dear wargamming stop listening to these scrubs that have destroyed the fun of the game over the years. Even wg said themselves the eu server is full of toxic crybabys.

vasilinhorulezz #20 Posted 28 March 2018 - 04:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

It's weak, weakspot should be 300mm effective, rest 450mm.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users