Jump to content


Moderators closing threads on erlenberg


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
19 replies to this topic

_Anarchistic_ #1 Posted 29 March 2018 - 03:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41046 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

so once again moderators are closing threads that are critical of war gaming

 

why have a forum if you simply close feedback

 

if the feedback is not positive or constructive perhaps there are good reasons for that

 

in the case of erlenberg there are simply no possible ways to be constructive, this is war gaming at their most stupid, obtuse and fxxx you players

 

all the feedback of test server ignored and they expect positive feedback

 

sorry wg my [edited]is not open and I am not shining your helmet



ThinGun #2 Posted 29 March 2018 - 03:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35841 battles
  • 1,470
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014
Can I be the first to say that Erlenberg is now totally TD friendly.  If you don't like the map change your strategy.

Lycopersicon #3 Posted 29 March 2018 - 03:35 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 10610 battles
  • 3,570
  • Member since:
    07-30-2014
That thread was not even that critical to WG (the hysterical first post aside), but actually a rather constructive discussion on which side has advantage in the new Erlenberg map. Guess that mod's ego needed a boost.

doriansky1 #4 Posted 29 March 2018 - 03:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30499 battles
  • 229
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

View PostThinGun, on 29 March 2018 - 03:28 PM, said:

Can I be the first to say that Erlenberg is now totally TD friendly.  If you don't like the map change your strategy.

You're not the first to say this, i think that was the first observation that any player had after playing new Erlenberg for 20 secs. 

 

Could you please be more specific about changing the strategy if you don't like the map ? Any specific advice about what i should do on Mines when i spawn north for example ? #soundsgood #doesntwork



MaxxyNL #5 Posted 29 March 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 980
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013
I like the map. :hiding:

Jigabachi #6 Posted 29 March 2018 - 04:07 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,565
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

Moderators closed YOUR thread about Erlenberg because the starting post wasn't even half a line long and completely pointless.

The mod most likely didn't read further than that, which is understandable.

Don't want your threads to get closed again? Then grow up, learn to write properly and google "constructive feedback".

Want a discussion? Start it properly. 


Edited by Jigabachi, 29 March 2018 - 04:10 PM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #7 Posted 29 March 2018 - 05:02 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 51226 battles
  • 2,087
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostThinGun, on 29 March 2018 - 04:28 PM, said:

Can I be the first to say that Erlenberg is now totally TD friendly.  If you don't like the map change your strategy.

 

Being TD friendly is okay by me since i played 9k+ battles in the skorpion G but the problem is there is almost no working strategy against TD positions in this map or at least i couldn't find one! :)

 

P.S: i assume neither of the teams are "special"


Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 29 March 2018 - 05:07 PM.


Karasu_Hidesuke #8 Posted 29 March 2018 - 05:43 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16170 battles
  • 3,995
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
I knew it. The end is near. Run for the hills! :ohmy:... oh bother.. they flattened them, didn't they...

L0ddy #9 Posted 29 March 2018 - 05:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 85194 battles
  • 2,472
  • [TWD] TWD
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011

View Post_Anarchistic_, on 29 March 2018 - 02:25 PM, said:

if the feedback is not positive or constructive perhaps there are good reasons for that

 

 

 

If you thought you had made an error, what kind of feedback would you prefer? After all, analyzing that error might lead you make positive steps to rethink any strategy you might have?

Can you not use the training room with a friend or clanmate & spend an evening exploring? If it's that important to you, why not email the devs? Perhaps there are forums dedicated to map discussion or even feedback on patches etc?

 

Spoiler

 

:)



_Anarchistic_ #10 Posted 29 March 2018 - 05:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41046 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

View PostL0ddy, on 29 March 2018 - 05:44 PM, said:

 

 

If you thought you had made an error, what kind of feedback would you prefer? After all, analyzing that error might lead you make positive steps to rethink any strategy you might have?

Can you not use the training room with a friend or clanmate & spend an evening exploring? If it's that important to you, why not email the devs? Perhaps there are forums dedicated to map discussion or even feedback on patches etc?

 

Spoiler

 

:)

 

yes there are, it was called the testserver and every bit of feedback ignored

 

same on sand box regarding steppes, same regarding 430u, 468v4, go further back same regarding arty changes.

 

we give feedback and wg ignores it, they bring this on themselves



OneSock #11 Posted 29 March 2018 - 05:55 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35792 battles
  • 1,713
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    06-06-2011

View PostThinGun, on 29 March 2018 - 03:28 PM, said:

Can I be the first to say that Erlenberg is now totally TD friendly.  If you don't like the map change your strategy.

 

it was TD friendly to begin with. Just not totally tomato friendly.

 

And Cliff now has "park your TD here" spots for the completely clueless.

 

And I did give all this feedback on the test server feedback forum and it wasn't even acknowledged.


Edited by OneSock, 29 March 2018 - 05:59 PM.


Slyspy #12 Posted 29 March 2018 - 06:03 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14205 battles
  • 16,755
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Post_Anarchistic_, on 29 March 2018 - 03:25 PM, said:

so once again moderators are closing threads that are critical of war gaming

 

why have a forum if you simply close feedback

 

if the feedback is not positive or constructive perhaps there are good reasons for that

 

in the case of erlenberg there are simply no possible ways to be constructive, this is war gaming at their most stupid, obtuse and fxxx you players

 

all the feedback of test server ignored and they expect positive feedback

 

sorry wg my [edited]is not open and I am not shining your helmet

 

Considering the title and opening post of your last attempt then I'm not surprised, even though a number of forumites actually bothered to make decent posts in it. 

Etre_ #13 Posted 29 March 2018 - 06:31 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52719 battles
  • 1,336
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014

View PostThinGun, on 29 March 2018 - 03:28 PM, said:

Can I be the first to say that Erlenberg is now totally TD friendly.  If you don't like the map change your strategy.

 

Erlenberg is a TD map only if you are the kind of red player that is happy camping the red line and doing 2 shot per game. 

This map absolutely sucks for TDs !

 

Why, because you guys are too slow to understand that middle wins the game. There so many bushes and hard cover places that nothing can move around the map without being exposed to it. 



Tidal_Force #14 Posted 29 March 2018 - 07:13 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16192 battles
  • 6,839
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View Postdoriansky1, on 29 March 2018 - 02:57 PM, said:

Could you please be more specific about changing the strategy if you don't like the map ?

 

Probably "drive to bush 5m from spawn and sit there for entire match". Generally, speaking "change your strategy" has always been codephrase for "camp hard" and "give up entire map", it was most often used in arty discussions of yore.

Edited by Tidal_Force, 29 March 2018 - 07:14 PM.


Solstad1069 #15 Posted 29 March 2018 - 07:41 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 41019 battles
  • 3,257
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013
From what i heard the city is the new meta on Erlenberg.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #16 Posted 29 March 2018 - 07:46 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 51226 battles
  • 2,087
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostEtre_, on 29 March 2018 - 07:31 PM, said:

 

Erlenberg is a TD map only if you are the kind of red player that is happy camping the red line and doing 2 shot per game. 

This map absolutely sucks for TDs !

 

Why, because you guys are too slow to understand that middle wins the game. There so many bushes and hard cover places that nothing can move around the map without being exposed to it. 

 

Nope, it is perfect for TDs whether they prefer to do 2 or 20 shots per game. Get a map and show us your proposed maneuvers around A0, H0 and A8 (for the attacking side) or K9/K0 and F0 (for the defending side) maybe that will highlight the importance of the boxed-in middle.

 

Losing an Erlenberg defense now is like losing mines encounter from the north spawn, requires a lot of good will from the enemy team.


Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 29 March 2018 - 07:49 PM.


Cobra6 #17 Posted 30 March 2018 - 08:01 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16343 battles
  • 15,991
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Huge open killing fields in front of important map locations that can be easily defended by one TD standing in bush cover at the back, what could go wrong.......

 

- They should never have removed buildings along the river, they should run the entire way on both sides to provide cover.

- TD sniping lanes are fine, but only towards areas where heavy armour fights. Not towards flanks where mediums/lights move/work.

 

Cobra 6



Shaade_Silentpaw #18 Posted 30 March 2018 - 08:09 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23416 battles
  • 447
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015
I like the new Erlenburg, certainly much better than the old one.

250swb #19 Posted 30 March 2018 - 08:31 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 23147 battles
  • 5,259
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
I've only played on it three or four times but each time was even more of a campfest than the old version of Erlenberg. It's now town against ridge line, just another couple of squares closer but with even less chance of flanking or covering the open ground. One thing the old map had going for it was the chance to get beyond enemy view range and manoeuvre, not so now.

Asklepi0s #20 Posted 30 March 2018 - 10:20 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 7654 battles
  • 858
  • Member since:
    01-23-2017
Hello _Anarchistic_ !

I understand your frustration regarding your thread but i have to say that you need to give us constructive feedback otherwise we will have to close your thread again.
If you need any help how you do that please do not hesitate to contact with us.We will be happy to give you some tips about how you can create constructive threads.
I will look forward to check your constructive threads in the future.
Have a wonderful day !
Thread is closed.

Best Regards,
Asklepi0s

 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users