Jump to content


Object 268 version 4

OP russian bias TD gameplay results balance broken

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

brevlada #1 Posted 30 March 2018 - 05:51 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13405 battles
  • 70
  • [WAAT] WAAT
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013
Soooooo, this vehicle is breaking the game at the moment, jingles uploaded a video with a perfect example of what it does, NOT WHAT IT CAN DO, BUT WHAT IT DOES, EVERY TIME, it isn't balanced in full tier 10 games, so what it does in tier 8 games is not enjoyable. As Jingles described it: heavy tank armor, medium tank mobility, and a TD gun, what is overpowered about that right? Weakest frontal armor you can expect to hit is 250 mm thick, and a smal target, the rest is 300mm effective, what makes that deserve such good mobility, and not be limited to tier 10 only games, IT IS GAMEBREAKING, FIX IT!

SABAOTH #2 Posted 30 March 2018 - 05:54 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 36793 battles
  • 2,914
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011

View Postbrevlada, on 30 March 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:

Soooooo, this vehicle is breaking the game at the moment, jingles uploaded a video with a perfect example of what it does, NOT WHAT IT CAN DO, BUT WHAT IT DOES, EVERY TIME, it isn't balanced in full tier 10 games, so what it does in tier 8 games is not enjoyable. As Jingles described it: heavy tank armor, medium tank mobility, and a TD gun, what is overpowered about that right? Weakest frontal armor you can expect to hit is 250 mm thick, and a smal target, the rest is 300mm effective, what makes that deserve such good mobility, and not be limited to tier 10 only games, IT IS GAMEBREAKING, FIX IT!

 

 

 

I might start a campaign for the sake of spacing. :izmena:



Shaade_Silentpaw #3 Posted 30 March 2018 - 05:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22586 battles
  • 370
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

All you have to do is scroll down the first page to find one of 50-odd threads about this already.

 

http://forum.worldof...the-next-patch/

 

Two, actually.

 

http://forum.worldof...68-v4-balanced/


Edited by Shaade_Silentpaw, 30 March 2018 - 06:02 PM.


PzTeufel #4 Posted 30 March 2018 - 06:23 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 5584 battles
  • 103
  • Member since:
    09-17-2015

View Postbrevlada, on 30 March 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:

Soooooo, this vehicle is breaking the game at the moment, jingles uploaded a video with a perfect example of what it does, NOT WHAT IT CAN DO, BUT WHAT IT DOES, EVERY TIME, it isn't balanced in full tier 10 games, so what it does in tier 8 games is not enjoyable. As Jingles described it: heavy tank armor, medium tank mobility, and a TD gun, what is overpowered about that right? Weakest frontal armor you can expect to hit is 250 mm thick, and a smal target, the rest is 300mm effective, what makes that deserve such good mobility, and not be limited to tier 10 only games, IT IS GAMEBREAKING, FIX IT!

 

That wont be happening, mate. See, that would mean less sells of premium ammo. And that would mean less weed, sports cars and hookers for these WG assface nerds. 

 

But dont worry, after a couple of branches there will be even more OP vehicles than object 268 4. 



ihateclowns #5 Posted 30 March 2018 - 06:51 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31100 battles
  • 237
  • [TROP] TROP
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
Just learn the weakspots there is two of them. Also jingles has not played wot in years, he posts the odd video on his youtube account just to keep his subs happy, so he has no clue about the obj 268v4

Balc0ra #6 Posted 30 March 2018 - 06:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66235 battles
  • 16,231
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Postbrevlada, on 30 March 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:

As Jingles described it: heavy tank armor, medium tank mobility, and a TD gun, what is overpowered about that right? Weakest frontal armor you can expect to hit is 250 mm thick, and a smal target, the rest is 300mm effective, what makes that deserve such good mobility, and not be limited to tier 10 only games, IT IS GAMEBREAKING, FIX IT!

 

And hull down the E3 has 330mm of armor at the weakest part. Only difference is that the 263 has bad alpha and DPM for a high caliber TD. So it's more or less like a HT indeed. Then again... 250 is the cupola. The rest depends on it's angle. If it's going over a ridge line to hit you, aim for the 2nd lower plate when he goes over. That's 120 to 150mm depending on angle. So even a stock tier 8 can pen that. If you have the high ground, then the upper plate should be easier to deal with vs the rest. If he is on flat ground vs you. Then aim low on the upper plate. You have a bigger chance to pen that then the super structure or the cupola.

 

If he is hull down vs your tier 8... Then as with the E3.. Just run to your team mates. No point if you can't flank it. Just let him sit there.



gunslingerXXX #7 Posted 30 March 2018 - 07:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11023 battles
  • 1,987
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

View PostBalc0ra, on 30 March 2018 - 06:59 PM, said:

Blabla...

 

If he is hull down vs your tier 8... Then as with the E3.. Just run to your team mates. No point if you can't flank it. Just let him sit there.

Thsts the fcking point dude. You can leave the E3 to sit there, but the obj 268 v4 will catch up with you because somehow it can do 55 km/h. Thats why it's OP. Its not correct to compare it with the E3



Ceeb #8 Posted 30 March 2018 - 07:12 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30216 battles
  • 5,240
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
It's a balanced tank.  Which was properly tested by those awesome Devs that obviously play their own game.  

Keep it up Devs.  You're awesome.  

Aikl #9 Posted 30 March 2018 - 07:12 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25517 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

As much as this is a problematic tank and should be discussed to death, there are plenty threads about it already. Three on the first page. One on the second, and a 20-something page thread somewhere further down.

 

Also, keeping discussions about vehicles and maps in the Gameplay forum kind of makes the rest of the forum pointless.

 

View PostCeeb, on 30 March 2018 - 06:12 PM, said:

It's a balanced tank. Which was properly tested by those awesome Devs that obviously play their own game.

Keep it up Devs. You're awesome.

 

​Most likely it was briefly tested by 'average' players that failed to utilize the vehicle as an assault gun. I'd be really interested in what kind of tests they actually run. 

 

 

 

 


Edited by Aikl, 30 March 2018 - 07:15 PM.


Ceeb #10 Posted 30 March 2018 - 07:19 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30216 battles
  • 5,240
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostAikl, on 30 March 2018 - 06:12 PM, said:

As much as this is a problematic tank and should be discussed to death, there are plenty threads about it already. Three on the first page. One on the second, and a 20-something page thread somewhere further down.

 

Also, keeping discussions about vehicles and maps in the Gameplay forum kind of makes the rest of the forum pointless.

 

I'm positive the Mods will close this. But it's the weekend.  And a bank holiday one to boot.  And due to the "selective" at they let certain threads run and close others.  

 

I expect this to run till Tuesday.  

 

 



soul3ater #11 Posted 30 March 2018 - 07:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18763 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostBalc0ra, on 30 March 2018 - 05:59 PM, said:

 

And hull down the E3 has 330mm of armor at the weakest part. Only difference is that the 263 has bad alpha and DPM for a high caliber TD. So it's more or less like a HT indeed. Then again... 250 is the cupola. The rest depends on it's angle. If it's going over a ridge line to hit you, aim for the 2nd lower plate when he goes over. That's 120 to 150mm depending on angle. So even a stock tier 8 can pen that. If you have the high ground, then the upper plate should be easier to deal with vs the rest. If he is on flat ground vs you. Then aim low on the upper plate. You have a bigger chance to pen that then the super structure or the cupola.

 

If he is hull down vs your tier 8... Then as with the E3.. Just run to your team mates. No point if you can't flank it. Just let him sit there.

 

I keep seeing your stupid comparison between e3 and the OP 268v4. either you're having a laugh or seriously deluded. E3 doesn't go 55km/h nor it has 22 traverse speed. when E3 get's the same speed then I will take you serious.

CircleOfSorrow #12 Posted 30 March 2018 - 07:53 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29236 battles
  • 2,136
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012
I want to know why I don't see three of them in platoons.  That would be a sight to behold.

Robi85 #13 Posted 30 March 2018 - 09:10 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23888 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View Postihateclowns, on 30 March 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:

Just learn the weakspots there is two of them. Also jingles has not played wot in years, he posts the odd video on his youtube account just to keep his subs happy, so he has no clue about the obj 268v4

 

Coming from a person that averages from 45-50% with his tier10's but has a magic 60%+ win rate in the OBJ v4. Feelsblyatman.

 

Just learn the weakspots he says hahahahah. 



brisha #14 Posted 30 March 2018 - 09:25 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15385 battles
  • 1,513
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

There are plenty game breaking tanks in this game right now. A defender top tier is just as game breaking, as is a Maus and an IS7 and an IS3 and a,,,,,, need I go on.

 

The game itself is broken now, so many OP tanks that the game balance is way, way off now.



PzTeufel #15 Posted 30 March 2018 - 11:03 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 5584 battles
  • 103
  • Member since:
    09-17-2015

View PostAikl, on 30 March 2018 - 07:12 PM, said:

As much as this is a problematic tank and should be discussed to death, there are plenty threads about it already. Three on the first page. One on the second, and a 20-something page thread somewhere further down.

 

Also, keeping discussions about vehicles and maps in the Gameplay forum kind of makes the rest of the forum pointless.

 

 

​Most likely it was briefly tested by 'average' players that failed to utilize the vehicle as an assault gun. I'd be really interested in what kind of tests they actually run. 

 

 

 

 

 

That is obvious.

 

1) they take weed 

 

2) they "do that" to each other in anus

 

3) they make some kind of "test report" if able to write.

 


Edited by PzTeufel, 30 March 2018 - 11:08 PM.


VarzA #16 Posted 30 March 2018 - 11:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20286 battles
  • 1,350
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    06-17-2011

View PostCircleOfSorrow, on 30 March 2018 - 07:53 PM, said:

I want to know why I don't see three of them in platoons.  That would be a sight to behold.

 

Saw a platoon of 2 on glacier just 1h ago.

They wrecked the mountain road, and immediately ended up taking shots on mid and in our base .... we only killed 5 tanks and they wiped us out in 5-6 min. :(



Balc0ra #17 Posted 31 March 2018 - 09:47 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66235 battles
  • 16,231
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostgunslingerXXX, on 30 March 2018 - 07:05 PM, said:

Thsts the fcking point dude. You can leave the E3 to sit there, but the obj 268 v4 will catch up with you because somehow it can do 55 km/h. Thats why it's OP. Its not correct to compare it with the E3

 

Would you rather face it hull down, or in the open where you can track it at least? As if he does follow you, the crap dpm, crap dispersion and no turret is what you should use vs it then. By forcing it to follow you into the open with no spots to back up. As then he is not hull down anymore showing armor you can pen. As pr the F point. Hulldown he has the advantage and will dominate you regardless, even with the crap dpm and low alpha for it's tier. In the open with a broken track... less so. As with an E3.. that's the only way most tier 8 meds and lights etc can deal with it. And how I've dealt with the few I've seen so far. And I've gladly taken a hit from it to get on his side. As on a low roll from it vs most tier X TD's. It's usually worth it.

 

If he want to sit in his hull down spot. I'm gonna let him. And not even go near that area.

 

Not saying it's UP or fine even. It needs some tweaks on the armor sure. But even so... it is what it is for now, and we just have to learn to deal with it until they change it. Just saying it's far from the worst on tier X in terms of TD's I would rather not face in my tier 8's. Tbh hull down and leading a charge it's a strong opponent to deal with. But alone in the open... not worse then the rest. As like with the Jap HT's. The more back up it has. The stronger it is.

 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 31 March 2018 - 09:49 AM.


LordMuffin #18 Posted 31 March 2018 - 12:26 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48094 battles
  • 11,092
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 30 March 2018 - 06:59 PM, said:

 

And hull down the E3 has 330mm of armor at the weakest part. Only difference is that the 263 has bad alpha and DPM for a high caliber TD. So it's more or less like a HT indeed. Then again... 250 is the cupola. The rest depends on it's angle. If it's going over a ridge line to hit you, aim for the 2nd lower plate when he goes over. That's 120 to 150mm depending on angle. So even a stock tier 8 can pen that. If you have the high ground, then the upper plate should be easier to deal with vs the rest. If he is on flat ground vs you. Then aim low on the upper plate. You have a bigger chance to pen that then the super structure or the cupola.

 

If he is hull down vs your tier 8... Then as with the E3.. Just run to your team mates. No point if you can't flank it. Just let him sit there.

The difference. 

The E3 you can outrun.

The Obj 268 v4 will outrun you.

Also,  E3 had weaker side armour, making it more vournable if angled badly.

E3 also have a lfp weakness which is big enough to hit, so it have to have hulldown.

The Obj 268 v4 doesn't need to be hulldown. 



HundeWurst #19 Posted 31 March 2018 - 12:42 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 69687 battles
  • 4,337
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

LOL

 

People arguing about the OP status of the V4. Everyone who thinks its a balanced tank has some unresolved issues with the game.



Palora #20 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:24 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 24617 battles
  • 430
  • [ROCOM] ROCOM
  • Member since:
    03-17-2010

View PostWunderWurst, on 31 March 2018 - 12:42 PM, said:

LOL

 

People arguing about the OP status of the V4. Everyone who thinks its a balanced tank has some unresolved issues with the game.

 

:D

You are just jelly that you don't have it yet since it's on a line that was so shitty almost no one bothered with it. 





Also tagged with OP, russian, bias, TD, gameplay, results, balance, broken

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users