Jump to content


New soviet tier X after T-10?

T-10 update new tanks obj-777 tier X replacement

  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

normann1606 #1 Posted 31 March 2018 - 03:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17364 battles
  • 15
  • [JOTNE] JOTNE
  • Member since:
    03-15-2012

hello fellow tankers! I am wondering if there is any new information about the tier X heavy tank that will come after the T-10. WG said that they are working on it, but did not mention any model names or release dates.

t(h)anks for answers!



Ziurawka #2 Posted 31 March 2018 - 03:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20016 battles
  • 395
  • [NLUFA] NLUFA
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015
No specifics, but I'm sure it will go 60 km/h, have 300mm effective frontal armor and shoot 500+ Alpha 350 pen heat. 

leggasiini #3 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:23 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9529 battles
  • 5,798
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Most likely this, as this thing is the most logical contination to the T-10:

 

 

The Object 277; basically a bigger, badder T-10.

 

Other possible tanks include Object 770, and Object 777 II (which is already in tanks.gg), but personally I just feel like that the Object 277 is the most logical tank to come after the T-10. If it was going to be the Object 777 II - then why they haven't still introduced it yet, as the model is ready?



Dava_117 #4 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:33 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17567 battles
  • 2,160
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postleggasiini, on 31 March 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Most likely this, as this thing is the most logical contination to the T-10:

 

 

The Object 277; basically a bigger, badder T-10.

 

Other possible tanks include Object 770, and Object 777 II (which is already in tanks.gg), but personally I just feel like that the Object 277 is the most logical tank to come after the T-10. If it was going to be the Object 777 II - then why they haven't still introduced it yet, as the model is ready?

 

I hope in this tank too! Is so damn good looking! :great:

leggasiini #5 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:38 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9529 battles
  • 5,798
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostDava_117, on 31 March 2018 - 05:33 PM, said:

 

I hope in this tank too! Is so damn good looking! :great:

 

I love it's looks as well. I like the longer hull of the T-10 with longer turret :^)



Dava_117 #6 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17567 battles
  • 2,160
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postleggasiini, on 31 March 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

 

I love it's looks as well. I like the longer hull of the T-10 with longer turret :^)

 

Yep. I also like the front hull shape! It looks so good!

 

The gun is the classical 122 M62-T2 isn't it?



CptBarney #7 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:51 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,914
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

View PostZiurawka, on 31 March 2018 - 02:57 PM, said:

No specifics, but I'm sure it will go 60 km/h, have 300mm effective frontal armor and shoot 500+ Alpha 350 pen heat. 

 

So the obj 279 then?

Foxhound128 #8 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8486 battles
  • 143
  • [NESI] NESI
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

View PostDava_117, on 31 March 2018 - 03:44 PM, said:

 

Yep. I also like the front hull shape! It looks so good!

 

The gun is the classical 122 M62-T2 isn't it?

 

Actually, it's the 130mm M-65

leggasiini #9 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:55 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9529 battles
  • 5,798
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostDava_117, on 31 March 2018 - 05:44 PM, said:

 

Yep. I also like the front hull shape! It looks so good!

 

The gun is the classical 122 M62-T2 isn't it?

 

It was supposed to have a 130 mm M-65 gun (not the same as the IS-7, but a different one). The gun seems very similar to the 122 M62-T2, though, so in-game it would function like it, just with bit more punch.

 

Probably 460-470 alpha (to make it bit different from the 5A) with 264 / 340 pen (to reflect the T-10's excellent penetration), and good gun handling would make the tank bit different from the 5A. The armor layout and mobility are also probably somewhat different.


Edited by leggasiini, 31 March 2018 - 04:56 PM.


Dava_117 #10 Posted 31 March 2018 - 04:58 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17567 battles
  • 2,160
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postleggasiini, on 31 March 2018 - 04:55 PM, said:

 

It was supposed to have a 130 mm M-65 gun (not the same as the IS-7, but a different one). The gun seems very similar to the 122 M62-T2, though, so in-game it would function like it, just with bit more punch.

 

Probably 460-470 alpha (to make it bit different from the 5A) with 264 / 340 pen (to reflect the T-10's excellent penetration), and good gun handling would make the tank bit different from the 5A. The armor layout and mobility are also probably somewhat different.

 

For a tank like this, I may even suffer to powergrind IS-3! Thank you legga!

And thanks to Foxhound128 too!



HaZardeur #11 Posted 31 March 2018 - 05:02 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33257 battles
  • 1,057
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010

View PostZiurawka, on 31 March 2018 - 03:57 PM, said:

No specifics, but I'm sure it will go 60 km/h, have 300mm effective frontal armor and shoot 500+ Alpha 350 pen heat. 

 

I heard they will give it HESH for reasons.

Foxhound128 #12 Posted 31 March 2018 - 05:03 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8486 battles
  • 143
  • [NESI] NESI
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

Actually, if we go, a little bit crazy:

 

Object 272 - T-10M with "Phalanga" anti-tank missile

Object 292, T-10M with Obj277/278 turret and 130mm M-65



samuelx43a #13 Posted 31 March 2018 - 05:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20302 battles
  • 809
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

View PostFoxhound128, on 31 March 2018 - 05:03 PM, said:

Actually, if we go, a little bit crazy:

 

Object 272 - T-10M with "Phalanga" anti-tank missile

Object 292, T-10M with Obj277/278 turret and 130mm M-65

the 292 t looks sick! I want that!



Sfinski #14 Posted 04 April 2018 - 07:47 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29704 battles
  • 1,988
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

"Soon"

 

https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2018/04/04/wot-new-russian-tanks-postponed/



blaster1112 #15 Posted 04 April 2018 - 09:12 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 9212 battles
  • 124
  • [RANGX] RANGX
  • Member since:
    09-02-2013

View PostSfinski, on 04 April 2018 - 07:47 PM, said:

 

This guy better not be right. Why else would you put a "coming soon" in the game. If it's gonna take at least 9 months.... That's dumb

Browarszky #16 Posted 04 April 2018 - 10:28 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14901 battles
  • 2,742
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View Postblaster1112, on 04 April 2018 - 08:12 PM, said:

 

This guy better not be right. Why else would you put a "coming soon" in the game. If it's gonna take at least 9 months.... That's dumb

 

Would be very irksome, I would prefer to know ASAP if grinding points on T-10 is going to be worthwhile for me. Or should I maybe wait for the upcoming Polish tech tree or go for the Chinese heavies instead....

Afdass #17 Posted 04 April 2018 - 10:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12284 battles
  • 626
  • Member since:
    07-26-2016
Not this year? Guess I'll have to get rid of some of the exp on the T-10 a bunch of times, like WG wants people to do.

Azazel_and_chill #18 Posted 05 April 2018 - 12:23 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8999 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    12-16-2015


jeltex #19 Posted 05 April 2018 - 12:49 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 37371 battles
  • 23
  • Member since:
    03-29-2011
Going by Wargamings standards I think whatever tank it is it will be mediocre due to everyone knowing its coming and will already have played the T-10 to get the xp and as the T-10 is a great tank and the grind has been fun. After the recent russian tanks being extremely strong I think they will try to balance it by making it just good and not OP.

Balc0ra #20 Posted 05 April 2018 - 02:20 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62749 battles
  • 14,361
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Postblaster1112, on 04 April 2018 - 09:12 PM, said:

 

This guy better not be right. Why else would you put a "coming soon" in the game. If it's gonna take at least 9 months.... That's dumb

 

You new here? Soon by WG standards is like 12+ months. I'll be impressed if they do manage it by Xmas.

 

Then again that means there is no rush to farm XP on the T-10 and 430 II.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users