Jump to content


Veto option against arty

arty

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
43 replies to this topic

IRAMTANKS #1 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:34 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1689 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    03-25-2018
Give us veto option against arty. So we can play without arty noobs.

MaxxyNL #2 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 980
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013
And after that you are starting to whine (open a new topic), that the battle queue takes to long.... :facepalm::harp:

PeaceWalker1 #3 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:37 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15678 battles
  • 1,192
  • [-WIR_] -WIR_
  • Member since:
    01-21-2012
I want a veto against certain maps, too

MaxxyNL #4 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 980
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013
I want a veto against certain players.. :honoring:

Xandania #5 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:39 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37098 battles
  • 1,084
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
Yay - everyone gets to ban one tank class and a few maps - leading to endless queues  :sceptic:

evilchaosmonkey #6 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:48 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16714 battles
  • 1,756
  • [EIGHT] EIGHT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

OP as a re-roll (created just last week, and already moaning that it's failed) haven't you learnt how to avoid arty yet?  

It is fairly easy, just Sleipner move everywhere you go.


Edited by evilchaosmonkey, 05 April 2018 - 06:32 PM.


malachi6 #7 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:50 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 50423 battles
  • 3,675
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

Arty post 1000. Literally, given that is as many results as the search feature will return

 


Edited by malachi6, 05 April 2018 - 05:51 PM.


mpf1959 #8 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17502 battles
  • 942
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-29-2017
I want a veto on people that veto! And so does my wife!

unhappy_bunny #9 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:55 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18576 battles
  • 2,843
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostIRAMTANKS, on 05 April 2018 - 05:34 PM, said:

Give us veto option against arty. So we can play without arty noobs.

 

I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you were a new player, but then my "troll" alarm went off. 

 

So tell us. Why do you want to play without arty? What is it you dislike about it? 

 

Or are you just a troll?



Bexleyheath #10 Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:58 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5815 battles
  • 354
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    01-07-2018

They should have arty in exlusive matchup games with only arty. That way they can be artied while they arty! :D

 


Edited by Bexleyheath, 05 April 2018 - 06:01 PM.


m1x_angelico #11 Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23119 battles
  • 873
  • [-VETO] -VETO
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015

I don't understand why people have issues with arty (especially arty with weak damage and "stun" that can be cured).

 

By aside that, your suggestion is not practical. You ask for no arty, I can ask for no TD, someone else will ask no meds, etc. 



vcristi #12 Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:01 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 68013 battles
  • 487
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011

View PostMaxxyNL, on 05 April 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

And after that you are starting to whine (open a new topic), that the battle queue takes to long.... :facepalm::harp:

 

Actually the queue to enter a battle would be the same as now for everyone, except 'arty players'...

Not going to happen since everyone would choose to not play with arty and the arty cash cows players would quit the game. And we all know WG likes to have many cash cows players...



Long_Range_Sniper #13 Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:01 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 33393 battles
  • 9,152
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011

View PostIRAMTANKS, on 05 April 2018 - 04:34 PM, said:

Give us veto option against arty. So we can play without arty noobs.

 

I'm not buying this! I smell Raspad's new account.



Bexleyheath #14 Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5815 battles
  • 354
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    01-07-2018

View Postm1x_angelico, on 05 April 2018 - 06:00 PM, said:

I don't understand why people have issues with arty (especially arty with weak damage and "stun" that can be cured).

 

From a game design point of view, it's one of the biggest failiures of the game. You have this class which is there to discourage/counteract camping behaviour, but campers usually stay hidden and unspotted. So they go after the targets they can see instead;  heavies and mediums battling eachother, forcing those guys to stay in cover and thus slowing down the gameplay for everyone. So in an ironic twist, arty actually causes camping and hiding instead of "making the game dynamic"

 

 

also, it's reeeally  annoying that they can take free potshots at you all day long, and you cant shoot back...



TheOddRogue #15 Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10081 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

Agreed.

Every new patch you should have the choice of playing the patch with or without arty until the next patch where a new vote begins.


Edited by TheOddRogue, 05 April 2018 - 06:48 PM.


Element6 #16 Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:56 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29798 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

Why do people use the word "veto"? The correct term would be "disable", just as we disable or enable Assault, Encounter and Grand Battles.

 

 



HundeWurst #17 Posted 05 April 2018 - 07:09 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 70107 battles
  • 4,377
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View Postmpf1959, on 05 April 2018 - 05:52 PM, said:

I want a veto on people that veto! And so does my wife!

 

I want to veto your wife... Oh wait :winkyface:

Palybilo #18 Posted 05 April 2018 - 07:10 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12686 battles
  • 63
  • [LVTFR] LVTFR
  • Member since:
    06-05-2012

View PostBexleyheath, on 05 April 2018 - 04:58 PM, said:

They should have arty in exlusive matchup games with only arty. That way they can be artied while they arty! :D

 

 

Oh Scorched Earth ♥ 

Best game ever. The old DOS version



Sirebellus #19 Posted 05 April 2018 - 07:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19726 battles
  • 573
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016

View PostBexleyheath, on 05 April 2018 - 06:42 PM, said:

 

From a game design point of view, it's one of the biggest failiures of the game.


I'm interested to know - from a game design point of view, obviously - how it is decided what is a failure ? and who makes that decision ?



FluffyRedFox #20 Posted 05 April 2018 - 07:54 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 23848 battles
  • 8,694
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View PostLong_Range_Sniper, on 05 April 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:

 

I'm not buying this! I smell Raspad's new account.

no, this was a different guy. I think same guy also did the "rot away the hands of those who nerf me" spam threads







Also tagged with arty

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users