Jump to content


CW tank buff!


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

hasnainrakha57 #1 Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13851 battles
  • 585
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

Are they insane?.Giving them 350mm of penetration for gold ammo many tanks in game which angle their armor to reach 330mm Effective armor will be useless when 350mm will melt through their armor.I am ok with other buffs but that 350mm of gold pen are they tds?.Where is this game going,towards death?

 

 

 

Edit:

1)Super stucture sloped one for 263 is 334mm effective thanks to 350mm pen its now weak spot.

2)T110e3 mini turret the lower part of it is 330mm effective now its weak spot.

3)E100 turret angle is useless.

 

And we know the cw tank player is unicum and the amount of gold ammo they fire is 100%


Edited by hasnainrakha57, 06 April 2018 - 05:24 PM.


Dava_117 #2 Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:17 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19497 battles
  • 3,309
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 06 April 2018 - 05:13 PM, said:

Are they insane?.Giving them 350mm of penetration for gold ammo many tanks in game which angle their armor to reach 330mm Effective armor will be useless when 350mm will melt through their armor.I am ok with other buffs but that 350mm of gold pen are they tds?.Where is this game going,towards death?

 

Have to agree with you this time! ;)

Buff HEAT pen to 350 is probably a way to increase P2W in this game. But WG also announced a premium shell rebalance project, so there is a low chance that this will be part of this rebalance, who know! :)



Spurtung #3 Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63775 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

The tragedy.

The horror.

 

Think of the children.



Y_O_L_0 #4 Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19802 battles
  • 906
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012
While I am happy for the buffs, I don't think the HEAT penetration buff is needed.

I would happily change the 350 mm pen for extra DPM. I probably shoot 1 HEAT shell per battle on average. 330 pen is enough against Type 5 Heavy and Maus.

hasnainrakha57 #5 Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13851 battles
  • 585
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostY_O_L_0, on 06 April 2018 - 04:22 PM, said:

While I am happy for the buffs, I don't think the HEAT penetration buff is needed.

I would happily change the 350 mm pen for extra DPM. I probably shoot 1 HEAT shell per battle on average. 330 pen is enough against Type 5 Heavy and Maus.

I am not against buff i am only against 350mm penetration buff.



LordMuffin #6 Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:30 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48172 battles
  • 11,115
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

Yes, it is a completely retarded buff.

 

As for you moderators sending reports.

That is about as constructive as it is possible to be about this.

The idea put forward to buff premium ammo is just stupid beyond imagination.


Edited by LordMuffin, 06 April 2018 - 05:43 PM.


Cobra6 #7 Posted 06 April 2018 - 06:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,770
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 06 April 2018 - 04:13 PM, said:

And we know the cw tank player is unicum and the amount of gold ammo they fire is 100%

 

Must hurt right, being dropped on your head so often?

 

Unicums fire premium ammo when the engagement dictates it, not all the time. People who fire gold all the time are called Re-/Fail Rolls and/or sealclubbers.

 

That being said, I agree with you that buffing premium ammo is a terrible idea at tier 10, it would be more useful to buff the standard ammo penetration instead.

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 06 April 2018 - 06:06 PM.


vasilinhorulezz #8 Posted 06 April 2018 - 07:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
So if your 268v4 gets shot by a Jageru's 420mm HEAT is OK, but the problem is the CW tanks premium pen buff?

hasnainrakha57 #9 Posted 06 April 2018 - 07:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13851 battles
  • 585
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 06 April 2018 - 06:15 PM, said:

So if your 268v4 gets shot by a Jageru's 420mm HEAT is OK, but the problem is the CW tanks premium pen buff?

Jagero is TD obj 268 gets 395mm.

Cw tanks are heavy and medium that get 350mm of pen.which is unfair.


Edited by hasnainrakha57, 06 April 2018 - 07:51 PM.


vasilinhorulezz #10 Posted 06 April 2018 - 11:24 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 06 April 2018 - 07:50 PM, said:

Jagero is TD obj 268 gets 395mm.

Cw tanks are heavy and medium that get 350mm of pen.which is unfair.

Why?



Spurtung #11 Posted 06 April 2018 - 11:36 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63775 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 07 April 2018 - 12:24 AM, said:

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 06 April 2018 - 07:50 PM, said:

Jagero is TD obj 268 gets 395mm.

Cw tanks are heavy and medium that get 350mm of pen.which is unfair.

Why?

"Because I don't own one!!!1!!!!!1"



Balc0ra #12 Posted 06 April 2018 - 11:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66298 battles
  • 16,316
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Most of them have 340 or 330 now. So vs your E100's 250 turret armor. It will still pen it like butter head on just like always. But those values have been changed 3 times since that first leak. As it's super test. So far from final.

 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 06 April 2018 - 11:42 PM.


LordMuffin #13 Posted 06 April 2018 - 11:45 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48172 battles
  • 11,115
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostSpurtung, on 06 April 2018 - 11:36 PM, said:

"Because I don't own one!!!1!!!!!1"

It is stupid, because premium ammo should not ever be buffed.

It just increases the benefit of prem ammo, increase the pay to play aspect further.

 

Terrible is that, and the p2w argument on lying gets stronger with this.



vasilinhorulezz #14 Posted 06 April 2018 - 11:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

I really enjoy how people think,

they drive a tank (268v4) that is completely invulnerable to normal rounds, and if people load the gold, they still expect to not get penned.

That is, people the reason Murazor is head of the balancing team, because he's not the hero we want, but he the hero we deserve.


Edited by vasilinhorulezz, 06 April 2018 - 11:51 PM.


AliceUnchained #15 Posted 07 April 2018 - 12:44 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 38414 battles
  • 8,928
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostLordMuffin, on 06 April 2018 - 11:45 PM, said:

It is stupid, because premium ammo should not ever be buffed.

 

True, but that's about the only point our dear OP has with any merit. Most of what it has written here is far, far more stupid. 



Simeon85 #16 Posted 07 April 2018 - 10:25 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 3,022
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

T57 heavy, 113, 5A, 121, 430U, IS4, E5 etc. all have 340 HEAT pen anyway so it's not any real difference to what is going to get penned and not.

 

Plus 350 HEAT pen is only 5.7% higher than 330 HEAT pen that most of the other meds already have.

 

Whilst I don't agree with the change, it's impact is going to be minimal, it's basically a handful of tanks that have slightly more RNG proof premium rounds and to be honest against 268v4s, Maus, Type 5 etc, tanks like the 121b and M60 need all the help they can get.

 

Would still prefer they buffed the standard pen by 20mm, that seems a more unique solution to me to give these vehicles a buff that is a bit different. 

 

Neither the M60 or 121b are going to challenge the meta after these buffs, they are bad tanks now and will still be average at best afterwards. 



German_Dunc #17 Posted 07 April 2018 - 12:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37773 battles
  • 1,906
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Well, they actually nerfed the E6 - it's absolutely dreadful now, instead of just terrible. 8 second reload with BIA and rammer, dispersion all over the place, and features auto-bounce seeking rounds. Meh turret armour with massive autopen tumour on the top. Meh mobility with crap hull armour.

 

In fact, it's so bad I've taken all the equipment, consumables, and shells out of it to stop myself playing it. The only other premium tank, of the ninety nine in garage, I've done that with is the KJpz. 

 

 


Edited by German_Dunc, 07 April 2018 - 12:24 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users