Jump to content


Kirovets-1

Pre tank

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

V4LKYRIE #1 Posted 09 April 2018 - 03:24 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21044 battles
  • 19
  • [JSTCE] JSTCE
  • Member since:
    10-19-2016
 İ wanna this tank in EU servers. İf u dont wanna bring defender again, bring this tank to game. İts already  exists in Xbox console. İ got bored crappre tank of 8 tier. They all have low roll gun. Like liberte,löwe, t26e5 etc.Kirovets-1 gameplay is similar as defender, high roll gun, good penetre,  speed and frontal armor. Totaly looks like good tank.  Get  kirovets-1 on website as soon as possible WG !

Sirebellus #2 Posted 09 April 2018 - 03:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016

Can I have a tank that has inpenetrable armour and a gun that will go through the front armour of a Maus or Type 5 please ?
Oh and that goes at 45kmh cos I don't like slow tanks and fires at least 8.2 shots per minute

 



250swb #3 Posted 09 April 2018 - 03:44 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22631 battles
  • 5,059
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Play the IS-3 with the stock turret and you are part way there.

V4LKYRIE #4 Posted 09 April 2018 - 04:30 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21044 battles
  • 19
  • [JSTCE] JSTCE
  • Member since:
    10-19-2016

View Post250swb, on 09 April 2018 - 03:44 PM, said:

Play the IS-3 with the stock turret and you are part way there.

 

​İ said about pre tank, u saying me ıs3 :trollface:​  

V4LKYRIE #5 Posted 09 April 2018 - 04:31 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21044 battles
  • 19
  • [JSTCE] JSTCE
  • Member since:
    10-19-2016

View PostSirebellus, on 09 April 2018 - 03:40 PM, said:

Can I have a tank that has inpenetrable armour and a gun that will go through the front armour of a Maus or Type 5 please ?
Oh and that goes at 45kmh cos I don't like slow tanks and fires at least 8.2 shots per minute

 

 

​Kiddo stop kidding,  idc u

PoIestar #6 Posted 09 April 2018 - 04:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31707 battles
  • 4,078
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View PostV4LKYRIE, on 09 April 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

İts already  exists in Xbox console.

 

Buy an Xbox then? It has no chat, all of the tanks that are 'cool' and EU doesn't get, and the graphics were 1.0 quality before it was cool.

 

It's actually perfect there.



arthurwellsley #7 Posted 09 April 2018 - 04:47 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 51761 battles
  • 3,022
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

No Thanks.

  • Matchmaking: Plays up to Tier 10
  • 50% Silver Bonus Earn
  • 15% XP Bonus Earn
  • Hit Points: 1550
  • Engine Power: 720 hp
  • Power/Weight Ratio: 15.16 hp/ton
  • Speed Limit: 42 km/h
  • Hull Traverse Speed: 26 deg/sec
  • Hull Armor: 140/100/60
  • Turret Armor: 195/120/100
  • Turret Traverse Speed: 24 deg/sec
  • Penetration: 221/270/61
  • Damage: 390/390/530
  • Aim Time: 3.1 sec
  • Accuracy: 0.45
  • Gun Caliber: 122 mm
  • Rate of Fire: 4.62 rounds/min
  • Max Ammo Capacity: 30 rounds
  • View Range: 360 m
  • Signal Range: 730 m


Browarszky #8 Posted 09 April 2018 - 04:51 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,734
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View Postarthurwellsley, on 09 April 2018 - 03:47 PM, said:

No Thanks.

  • Matchmaking: Plays up to Tier 10
  • 50% Silver Bonus Earn
  • 15% XP Bonus Earn
  • Hit Points: 1550
  • Engine Power: 720 hp
  • Power/Weight Ratio: 15.16 hp/ton
  • Speed Limit: 42 km/h
  • Hull Traverse Speed: 26 deg/sec
  • Hull Armor: 140/100/60
  • Turret Armor: 195/120/100
  • Turret Traverse Speed: 24 deg/sec
  • Penetration: 221/270/61
  • Damage: 390/390/530
  • Aim Time: 3.1 sec
  • Accuracy: 0.45
  • Gun Caliber: 122 mm
  • Rate of Fire: 4.62 rounds/min
  • Max Ammo Capacity: 30 rounds
  • View Range: 360 m
  • Signal Range: 730 m

 

So.. essentially a non-pike nose version of the IS-3A with an inferior turret... no solution to the Defender fever, then.

leggasiini #9 Posted 09 April 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14187 battles
  • 6,194
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostBrowarszky, on 09 April 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:

 

So.. essentially a non-pike nose version of the IS-3A with an inferior turret... no solution to the Defender fever, then.

 

It has better mobility, armor, gun handling, view range and while turret is worse, it has no roof weakspot so its actually arguably better, cus its still pretty strong.

 

It's basically IS-3A but flat out better. Then again, the IS-3A is quite bad, so yea...



LordMuffin #10 Posted 09 April 2018 - 05:09 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48136 battles
  • 11,108
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View Postleggasiini, on 09 April 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:

 

It has better mobility, armor, gun handling, view range and while turret is worse, it has no roof weakspot so its actually arguably better, cus its still pretty strong.

 

It's basically IS-3A but flat out better. Then again, the IS-3A is quite bad, so yea...

Still whole UFP is pretty weak, and lfp is very weak.

Armour wise, this tank is not to good for T8.



leggasiini #11 Posted 09 April 2018 - 05:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14187 battles
  • 6,194
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostLordMuffin, on 09 April 2018 - 06:09 PM, said:

Still whole UFP is pretty weak, and lfp is very weak.

Armour wise, this tank is not to good for T8.

 

I dont know, the UFP is around 230-240 mm effective against AP without any angling, and it can angle it a bit. It can also sidescrape because the lower side armor is not too weak, although the frontal turret can be annoying. The gun seems to be similar potato as IS-3A's gun, though, with bit better handling but worse DPM. 

 

It doesn't seem to particularly interesting, but I can imagine this being an IS-6 "replacement", or something.



LordMuffin #12 Posted 09 April 2018 - 06:35 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48136 battles
  • 11,108
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View Postleggasiini, on 09 April 2018 - 05:15 PM, said:

 

I dont know, the UFP is around 230-240 mm effective against AP without any angling, and it can angle it a bit. It can also sidescrape because the lower side armor is not too weak, although the frontal turret can be annoying. The gun seems to be similar potato as IS-3A's gun, though, with bit better handling but worse DPM. 

 

It doesn't seem to particularly interesting, but I can imagine this being an IS-6 "replacement", or something.

230-240 is not super good, it works against same tier, which is good. And with a weak lfp, it will require some skill to make it work.



250swb #13 Posted 09 April 2018 - 06:47 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22631 battles
  • 5,059
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Don't think we'll see the OP again on this one.....

Enforcer1975 #14 Posted 09 April 2018 - 06:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,862
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View Postleggasiini, on 09 April 2018 - 05:01 PM, said:

 

It has better mobility, armor, gun handling, view range and while turret is worse, it has no roof weakspot so its actually arguably better, cus its still pretty strong.

 

It's basically IS-3A but flat out better. Then again, the IS-3A is quite bad, so yea...

 

Yeah funny how they buffed / removed a post stamp sized weakspot on the IS-3 but not on the US T-tanks

Browarszky #15 Posted 09 April 2018 - 09:49 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,734
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostEnforcer1975, on 09 April 2018 - 05:54 PM, said:

 

Yeah funny how they buffed / removed a post stamp sized weakspot on the IS-3 but not on the US T-tanks

 

Must have been on innocent oversight on their part. :trollface:

Balc0ra #16 Posted 09 April 2018 - 11:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66275 battles
  • 16,274
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostV4LKYRIE, on 09 April 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

 İ wanna this tank in EU servers. İf u dont wanna bring defender again, bring this tank to game. İts already  exists in Xbox console. İ got bored crappre tank of 8 tier. They all have low roll gun. Like liberte,löwe, t26e5 etc.Kirovets-1 gameplay is similar as defender, high roll gun, good penetre,  speed and frontal armor. Totaly looks like good tank.  Get  kirovets-1 on website as soon as possible WG !

 

I would still take the Lowe over that. As it has more pen, laser sight gun even when you shoot from the hip, that you won't get from a 122mm gun. Plus a troll mantle vs even tier X guns.  Alpha and mobility is not everything. It if was more would even play the IS-6.

 

Then again console is run differently, and by different ppl. They take tanks they find on the WG dev server and sell them or add them to the game as they want. Thus why they still have the WT auf E100 and we don't. As they even sell tier 8/7 CW reward tanks or even the campaign tanks as normal premiums in the store. As console don't have the campaign to name one, so they sell them instead. So for all we know. It might be set as one of the next campaign rewards vs to be sold. Or even as a future CW tank. That or it's to badly balanced to be sold based on past experiences. And if it's one of those 3 vs planned for normal sale. Don't expect to see it soon.

 

View PostEnforcer1975, on 09 April 2018 - 06:54 PM, said:

 

Yeah funny how they buffed / removed a post stamp sized weakspot on the IS-3 but not on the US T-tanks

 

Mostly because it was the worst tier 8 tank in terms of WR on RU, unlike the US tanks. It had 43% server average at some point. Thus all the weird buffs to it over the years. Inc the magical side armor buff.

 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 09 April 2018 - 11:05 PM.


Browarszky #17 Posted 09 April 2018 - 11:09 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16096 battles
  • 3,734
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 09 April 2018 - 10:04 PM, said:

 

Mostly because it was the worst tier 8 tank in terms of WR on RU, unlike the US tanks. It had 43% server average at some point. Thus all the weird buffs to it over the years. Inc the magical side armor buff.

 

 

 

That highlights one of the major issues I have with WoT. In this case, was the prebuffed version the one more based on reality, or the one equipped with the magical side armor? Does this mean that instead of dealing with the reality of failed, obsolete or inferior designs WG summons an army of fairies to sprinkle magic pixel dust on whichever tank is most in need of it?





Also tagged with Pre tank

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users