Jump to content


Bring back the WT auf E100


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

Poll: Should they bring back the WT auf e100? (164 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should WG bring back the WT auf E100?

  1. Yes (66 votes [40.24%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.24%

  2. No (98 votes [59.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 59.76%

Vote Hide poll

yeezusk #1 Posted 11 April 2018 - 09:27 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3164 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    07-09-2017

With the current meta I think WG should bring back the old wunder waffle. Type 5 heavy? No problem, you can clip it, before they bring it back I think they should just buff it ;) maybe a 170mm autoloader? with 4 shots and 1 second between each shot with a 30 second reload time. To make up for the fast firing 170mm , give it arty aim time and accuracy, and make the velocity like 3000m/s so the eney doesnt even know what hit them and to stop the haters hating on this tank. Oh and give it 200pen so it has to use gold ammo. Sounds balanced right? Now we dont have to worry about the obj 268 v4 anymore.

 

 

this is a joke btw lol



hasnainrakha57 #2 Posted 11 April 2018 - 09:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14786 battles
  • 670
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
Lol!i wanted to post the same thing and u did it.
Wt auf e100 p is in kong zhong server its balaced one version of wt auf e100.That tank was true gem of german tech tree untill wg removed it.They should bring it back.If russian can have obj 268v4,obj430u defender,obj 257.Japanese type 5.British ducks with sq and fv4005.They are op remove them as u did with auf e100.If no then bring back auf e100 in game.With current meta and op tanks auf e100 will be totally balanced.

Edited by hasnainrakha57, 11 April 2018 - 09:41 PM.


CircleOfSorrow #3 Posted 11 April 2018 - 09:41 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29236 battles
  • 2,136
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012
I know you are only joking, but I do wish they would rework the line.  I hate my Grille 15 :/

hasnainrakha57 #4 Posted 11 April 2018 - 09:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14786 battles
  • 670
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostCircleOfSorrow, on 11 April 2018 - 08:41 PM, said:

I know you are only joking, but I do wish they would rework the line. I hate my Grille 15 :/

We are not joking.When someone speak about German tank he dont joke.



WE DEMAND AUF E100 P IN GAME.
 

Edited by xxTANK_Uxx, 18 June 2018 - 12:53 PM.


CircleOfSorrow #5 Posted 11 April 2018 - 09:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29236 battles
  • 2,136
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 11 April 2018 - 08:41 PM, said:

We are not joking.When someone speak about German tank he dont joke.

 

The last line of the OP states that he isn't being serious.  I note that you are.



Search_Warrant #6 Posted 11 April 2018 - 09:55 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27736 battles
  • 6,435
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
All im hearing is

SnowRelic #7 Posted 11 April 2018 - 10:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23356 battles
  • 589
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
The art of listening requires some subtlety. And I didn't know you use a screenreader.

LordMuffin #8 Posted 11 April 2018 - 10:50 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48529 battles
  • 11,268
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011
With T10 currently getting filled up with retarded and broken T10 tanks, then why not add another retarded broken T10 tank to that useless pit.

Mr_Beefy #9 Posted 12 April 2018 - 02:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23824 battles
  • 654
  • [OZ77] OZ77
  • Member since:
    09-13-2015

Personally, I think that the WTe100 should stay just where it is.

A platoon of 3 WTe100's could simply rofl'stomp a flank.  While there are several vehicles that are in fact standing out.  (no, not the 907, since the 907 is 99.99% owned by skilled players only and that is the reason why it stands out statistically), there is no need for a tank that can take down 5 tanks  (or a kolobanovs) with 560+- 25% HP within 9-12 seconds.  Or 4 750+- 25% HP tanks within 12 seconds, or worse yet, in it's original form, a top gun in 12-14 seconds with 6 560+- 25% HP tanks.

Truly a sick vehicle.  WG was 100% right in removing it, and 100% wrong for even introducing it in the 1st place.  (think how much money WG made of FXP conversion just on that line)



TheOddRogue #10 Posted 12 April 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10104 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012
The amount of Yes says a lot about the wot playerbase. 

djuro900 #11 Posted 12 April 2018 - 02:45 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16829 battles
  • 304
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View PostTheOddRogue, on 12 April 2018 - 01:43 PM, said:

The amount of Yes says a lot about the wot playerbase. 

 

Saw your comment and voted yes :) you do realise that most of people voted yes for crapand giggles



Shaade_Silentpaw #12 Posted 12 April 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23448 battles
  • 452
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

Honestly it would be very satisfying to use a WT E100 against a 268 v4 or Type 5 - but I'd prefer they just fix those tanks rather than add more broken ones.

 

Still voted yes for the lulz though - not like it matters~ :rolleyes:



Mr_Beefy #13 Posted 12 April 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23824 battles
  • 654
  • [OZ77] OZ77
  • Member since:
    09-13-2015

I heard a rumor about a Tier 8 Premium version of it with standard MM, using the gun from the Tiger 1.

It would be an instant hit in T8 CW/SH/Team battles.

 

View PostShaade_Silentpaw, on 12 April 2018 - 03:47 PM, said:

Honestly it would be very satisfying to use a WT E100 against a 268 v4 or Type 5 - but I'd prefer they just fix those tanks rather than add more broken ones.

 

Still voted yes for the lulz though - not like it matters~ :rolleyes:

 

In current meta, the derp would be loaded with full HEAT, giving 4 E100 Shells to rip a Type 5 to shreds from full in 12 seconds.

Obj268v4 would be rebalanced quickly as well.

 

But still, no, nein, niet, la, lo, HELL NO!!!


 

mortalsatsuma #14 Posted 12 April 2018 - 03:15 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13559 battles
  • 1,674
  • Member since:
    06-13-2014
The main reason WG won't bring back the WT Auf E100 is because in the current meta of utterly broken tier 10 tanks, it would actually be under-powered. :trollface:

Shaade_Silentpaw #15 Posted 12 April 2018 - 03:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23448 battles
  • 452
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View Postmortalsatsuma, on 12 April 2018 - 02:15 PM, said:

The main reason WG won't bring back the WT Auf E100 is because in the current meta of utterly broken tier 10 tanks, it would actually be under-powered. :trollface:

 

Yeah, paint it in Soviet colours, slap on some red stars and rename it to the Object E100 - it'll be in the game next week. :trollface:

Lord_Edge #16 Posted 12 April 2018 - 03:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5991 battles
  • 834
  • Member since:
    11-26-2016
I'd be fine with it returning, but it is highly comical that power creep has gotten to the point where it would be fine to reinstate a tank removed for being so OP, because it wouldn't be that op in the current meta XD

Cobra6 #17 Posted 12 April 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16345 battles
  • 16,055
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

So your solution to a problem (Type5 heavy) is to implement an even bigger problem (Waffel E-100)?

 

You could work for Wargaming dude, they also think that a problem (premium ammo penning heavy armour) can be fixed by adding an even bigger problem (increasing armour values so much that standard ammo can no longer penetrate) instead of addressing the actual problem (premium ammo).

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 12 April 2018 - 03:47 PM.


soul3ater #18 Posted 12 April 2018 - 03:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18854 battles
  • 635
  • [OMNIA] OMNIA
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012
It wouldn't make any difference anyway, too many retd proof tanks in the game already.

PervyPastryPuffer #19 Posted 12 April 2018 - 08:21 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 31645 battles
  • 2,410
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

They could bring it back for like, a week, in a special event involving some kind of shooting minigame...

 

Oh, here's a thought. :trollface:

 

ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE HALLOWEEN EVENT   sounds cheesy...doesn't it? :unsure:

 

It might work in some sense: the WTF E100's turret is poorly armored, and you know zombies want brains... so its "brains" are easy to get to...

 

Something along those lines. Needs more thought.



HaZardeur #20 Posted 12 April 2018 - 08:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 34664 battles
  • 1,291
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010
I guess all the no voters are super heavy jockeys ?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users