Jump to content


Action X turret

turret pen armour 1.0

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

lumberjack500 #1 Posted 12 April 2018 - 12:56 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21982 battles
  • 54
  • [U-L] U-L
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013
The action X is now a shitty M48 thanks to the M48 buff The top of the turret and the cheeks of the turret are way to weak. I have discovered whilst attempting to 3 mark it the fact this tank is now only better than the leo 1 and is worse than even the E50M and 121 shows that even with the 9.20 buff it wasn't enough. (I've had more than enough experience as you can see here i was at one point at 93.55% MOE https://imgur.com/a/kyNT7)

K_A #2 Posted 12 April 2018 - 02:02 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13626 battles
  • 4,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

Now don't get this the wrong way, but all I'm basically seeing is "waa waa look at me I'm so close to 3 marks but pls buff this tank so I can get the third mark!" Everyone is playing the same tank, everyone is struggling with the turret having the flat bits, it's up to you to be better than the others to get the 3 marks. Doesn't matter if the tank sucks or not, if it sucks it'll suck for everyone.



hasnainrakha57 #3 Posted 12 April 2018 - 06:43 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13784 battles
  • 583
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

Now please decide which tonk got better turret and which one has worse and acctually need buff.

 

Attached Files

  • Attached File   Screenshot_20180412-084102.png   347.69K
  • Attached File   Screenshot_20180412-084045.png   384K


Simeon85 #4 Posted 12 April 2018 - 08:56 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,764
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 12 April 2018 - 06:43 AM, said:

Now please decide which tonk got better turret and which one has worse and acctually need buff.

 

 

Neither need a buff. 

 

Tanks like the M48 Patton, IS7, Super Conq, 430U etc. need a nerf.

 

They buffed the Patton turret twice which was a mistake, they should have given it the new smaller cupola and left it as it is, it has great gun handling and high DPM, it doesn't need an amazing turret as well.



OCaptainMyCaptain #5 Posted 12 April 2018 - 09:08 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12249 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013
All tanks should have Type 5 Heavy armor and LT-100 mobility! :facepalm::trollface:

Ze_HOFF_fverhoef #6 Posted 12 April 2018 - 10:37 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 15159 battles
  • 3,136
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012

View PostOCaptainMyCaptain, on 12 April 2018 - 08:08 AM, said:

All tanks should have Type 5 Heavy armor and LT-100 mobility! :facepalm::trollface:

 

With an autoloader Type 5 derp gun with some laser precision perhaps?

tumppi776 #7 Posted 12 April 2018 - 10:47 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 42470 battles
  • 2,303
  • Member since:
    01-27-2014
yet everytime I spam gold (T110E4 375mm APCR) at AX turret - it bounces.

Edited by tumppi776, 12 April 2018 - 10:47 AM.


Simeon85 #8 Posted 12 April 2018 - 11:02 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,764
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Posttumppi776, on 12 April 2018 - 10:47 AM, said:

yet everytime I spam gold (T110E4 375mm APCR) at AX turret - it bounces.

 

The APCR basically makes not much difference, the AP has enough pen to go through the flatter parts of the Cent AX turret (it's like 80% chance to pen), so APCR on the E4 will only increase that by a little bit and if you hit the sloped parts then when using it's gun depression half the turret is auto-bounce for AP and APCR. 

Mimos_A #9 Posted 12 April 2018 - 11:04 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23409 battles
  • 1,949
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015

It's fine, especially if you use your gun depression you're going to bounce a damn lot.

 

And while the m48 has better alround armour, it's also a lot slower. The Cent AX is a lot better at getting to key positions fast or bailing out when a situation looks to be going south.


Overall the m48 might be a bit better, but it's definitely a close run.



Dava_117 #10 Posted 12 April 2018 - 11:10 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19058 battles
  • 3,112
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
With 258 pen gun, you can't reliably pen it, and if AX use all the gun depression, you need HEAT to pen the sloped part of the turret, because AP(CR) bounce on it. Quite a good turret I would say...

Rock_n_Rollie #11 Posted 16 April 2018 - 08:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11401 battles
  • 565
  • Member since:
    10-11-2017

View PostZe_HOFF_fverhoef, on 12 April 2018 - 10:37 AM, said:

 

With an autoloader Type 5 derp gun with some laser precision perhaps?

 

And overhead drones to spot for you...

 

 



Hiisi #12 Posted 19 April 2018 - 05:21 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14713 battles
  • 261
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    03-21-2011
Ithink that they are well balanced. CAX is better at hulldown and sniping. Patton is better at level ground and brawling. 

Gardar7 #13 Posted 19 April 2018 - 08:08 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22852 battles
  • 1,645
  • [VKG-] VKG-
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

View PostSimeon85, on 12 April 2018 - 05:56 AM, said:

 

Neither need a buff. 

 

Tanks like the M48 Patton, IS7, Super Conq, 430U etc. need a nerf.

 

They buffed the Patton turret twice which was a mistake, they should have given it the new smaller cupola and left it as it is, it has great gun handling and high DPM, it doesn't need an amazing turret as well.

 

No, only the STB-1 needs a nurfff, it is too stronk tenk. 





Also tagged with turret, pen, armour, 1.0

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users