Jump to content


Are there any rebalancing actions taking in 1.0.1? OR whatever the next major patch is called


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

HundeWurst #1 Posted 13 April 2018 - 02:55 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 69735 battles
  • 4,337
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

Hey,

 

I just saw the announcement on the portal. What I was missing are balancing adjustments. Are there really non?

 

If that is true.... O M E G A L U L How pathetic can a company be?



leggasiini #2 Posted 13 April 2018 - 02:56 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14130 battles
  • 6,191
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Yeah, absolutely no balance adjustments whatsoever.

 

Obj 268 v4 dynasty continues :^)



TheOddRogue #3 Posted 13 April 2018 - 03:08 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9988 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    08-08-2012

It's totally balanced comrede. Just flank it comrede. 

 

Edit: The page is now "error 404: page not found", even their own website disagrees with them :)


Edited by TheOddRogue, 13 April 2018 - 03:10 PM.


clanmcwood #4 Posted 13 April 2018 - 03:19 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22107 battles
  • 1,295
  • [-VIC-] -VIC-
  • Member since:
    02-29-2012
no no get your tin foil hats out the trolls will say like pathetic little fan boy gangster wanna bes  No this company couldn't give a toss about teh player base whop want the game to get better they only care about profits and being power *edit on the forum, they purposefully stifle and quash any thread of any real value and ANY comments they say they are not great, thats why they let the trolls get away with all the crap they do (awaiting my ban to prove me right)

Edited by Jbnn, 16 April 2018 - 08:09 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Simeon85 #5 Posted 13 April 2018 - 03:20 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,997
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013
Nope, not enough people have free XP'd to the 268v4 yet, WG will claim they are still gathering data and the playerbase hasn't adapted to the tank yet. 

Geno1isme #6 Posted 13 April 2018 - 03:23 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42587 battles
  • 7,808
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
268v4 has only been out for like 3 months. Nerfing OP tanks takes at least a year (see E5).

NoobySkooby #7 Posted 13 April 2018 - 04:21 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 12964 battles
  • 2,758
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostGeno1isme, on 13 April 2018 - 03:23 PM, said:

268v4 has only been out for like 3 months. Nerfing OP tanks takes at least a year (see E5).

 

Can we have a super OP powerful up armoured medium tank then that would smash the Defender to bits upon mere sight of it, then there would be no need for the Defender not to come back in the shop:trollface:

Rati_Festa #8 Posted 13 April 2018 - 06:22 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42780 battles
  • 1,372
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012

View Postkaptainkrunch, on 13 April 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

 

Can we have a super OP powerful up armoured medium tank then that would smash the Defender to bits upon mere sight of it, then there would be no need for the Defender not to come back in the shop:trollface:

 

We got that its called the obj 430u



ihateclowns #9 Posted 13 April 2018 - 06:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31147 battles
  • 238
  • [TROP] TROP
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
Obj 268v 4 is not that hard to take down. Really easy weakpoint on the top to hit. Type 5 heavy is wayyyyy more op and should be nerfed, so is super conquerer and badger in right position. loads of other tanks that need a nerf before the 268v4

D4wiD3K #10 Posted 13 April 2018 - 06:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 659 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2012

No, didn't you know that the balancing of high tiers is basically completed? :)

 

View Postihateclowns, on 13 April 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:

Obj 268v 4 is not that hard to take down. Really easy weakpoint on the top to hit. Type 5 heavy is wayyyyy more op and should be nerfed, so is super conquerer and badger in right position. loads of other tanks that need a nerf before the 268v4

 

Who'd have guessed that 268 v4 is by far your best performer at tier 10? :great:


Edited by D4wiD3K, 13 April 2018 - 06:38 PM.


Balc0ra #11 Posted 13 April 2018 - 06:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66256 battles
  • 16,237
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostGeno1isme, on 13 April 2018 - 03:23 PM, said:

268v4 has only been out for like 3 months. Nerfing OP tanks takes at least a year (see E5).

 

To be fair, it still needs nerfs. Like a mobility nerf and a cupola nerf for starters at least. Issue is tho that it's still the lowest tier X populated tank, and it has hardly gone up since it came. And it's mostly only driven by good players atm. Tomatoes are still grinding the tier 8 as that has exploded in population since the line change. So if they nerf it to much, the tomatoes will start to drag the WR on it down, and screaming about buffing it again.

 

Tho WG did say the balance focus would come back after 1.0. And that the KV-5 to name one was planned for the first patches then. But they did not say when that focus would come back. As in 1.0.1 or after it. But I suspect the Italian tree is in focus this patch anyway. So I did not expect much in terms of buffs or nerfs now either.

 

View Postihateclowns, on 13 April 2018 - 06:32 PM, said:

Obj 268v 4 is not that hard to take down. Really easy weakpoint on the top to hit.

 

It has.. but not all tier 8's, or even tier 9's can reliably pen it with gold even. As it is 250mm. Nor is it an easy target to hit at range. And yeah it don't have a turret and you can track bully it if you have mobility in the open. But it still has rather good mobility for a TD with that armor. So with a good repair crew on it. It's still not that easy.


Edited by Balc0ra, 13 April 2018 - 06:39 PM.


D4wiD3K #12 Posted 13 April 2018 - 06:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 659 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2012

View PostBalc0ra, on 13 April 2018 - 05:36 PM, said:

It has.. but not all tier 8's, or even tier 9's can reliably pen it with gold even. As it is 250mm. Nor is it an easy target to hit at range. And yeah it don't have a turret and you can track bully it if you have mobility in the open. But it still has rather good mobility for a TD with that armor. So with a good repair crew on it. It's still not that easy.

 

He has 57% win rate with it. His 2nd best tier 10 tank(he has 15) has 52%. It also deals 500+ more damage than his other tier 10 tanks, barring Object 430U that he has only a few battles on. Clearly he doesn't see any problem with the tank.


Edited by D4wiD3K, 13 April 2018 - 06:44 PM.


HundeWurst #13 Posted 13 April 2018 - 07:51 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 69735 battles
  • 4,337
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostD4wiD3K, on 13 April 2018 - 06:43 PM, said:

 

He has 57% win rate with it. His 2nd best tier 10 tank(he has 15) has 52%. It also deals 500+ more damage than his other tier 10 tanks, barring Object 430U that he has only a few battles on. Clearly he doesn't see any problem with the tank.

 

Picking overall winrate as a balancing factor is one of the worst things you can do.

The Overall winrate vs tank winrate is MUCH MUCH MUCH better, the overall winrate can basically be ignored.

 

And have a look at the statistics yourself. The tanks is ridiculous OP. For once Wargamings "sledgehammer" balancing would actually make sense. Nerf that thing hard. REALLY HARD. If it wants to keep its armor it should not go faster than the JPE100, heck is should be slower since it got better armor.

Or nerf the armor into oblivion.



Enforcer1975 #14 Posted 13 April 2018 - 07:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,857
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
IS-7 will get a buff soon because we could pen their side armor in one game and all 3 IS-7 did a whopping 70 damage combined. Sorry for that guys. 
 

View PostWunderWurst, on 13 April 2018 - 07:51 PM, said:

 

Picking overall winrate as a balancing factor is one of the worst things you can do.

The Overall winrate vs tank winrate is MUCH MUCH MUCH better, the overall winrate can basically be ignored.

 

And have a look at the statistics yourself. The tanks is ridiculous OP. For once Wargamings "sledgehammer" balancing would actually make sense. Nerf that thing hard. REALLY HARD. If it wants to keep its armor it should not go faster than the JPE100, heck is should be slower since it got better armor.

Or nerf the armor into oblivion.

 

Nah they should implement a system that rates every aspect of a tank and returns a number which we can call "combat value" instead of winrate and average damage. 

 

 


 

Edited by Jbnn, 16 April 2018 - 08:10 AM.


Hardass #15 Posted 13 April 2018 - 08:00 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 32965 battles
  • 1,189
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010
They are re balancing gold ammo by making it credit purchase only so you cant buy it with gold any more (who the F buy gold ammo with gold any how)

LordMuffin #16 Posted 13 April 2018 - 08:06 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48094 battles
  • 11,105
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostWunderWurst, on 13 April 2018 - 02:55 PM, said:

Hey,

 

I just saw the announcement on the portal. What I was missing are balancing adjustments. Are there really non?

 

If that is true.... O M E G A L U L How pathetic can a company be?

No nerf but did you read this?

 

Province has grown from the compact size of 600x600 meters to 850x850 meters, and thanks to this change, the map now welcomes vehicles all the way up to Tier X. 



Sfinski #17 Posted 13 April 2018 - 08:07 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31689 battles
  • 2,610
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
*edit

Edited by Jbnn, 16 April 2018 - 08:15 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


DaddysLittlePrincess #18 Posted 13 April 2018 - 08:10 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24670 battles
  • 213
  • Member since:
    08-14-2012
Campaign reward tanks got buffed. 

HundeWurst #19 Posted 13 April 2018 - 08:46 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 69735 battles
  • 4,337
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostDaddysLittlePrincess, on 13 April 2018 - 08:10 PM, said:

Campaign reward tanks got buffed. 

 

Yeah because that was the biggest concern balancing wise there is and was....

 

I mot saying that I dont want them buffed but in the end like really?



D4wiD3K #20 Posted 13 April 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 659 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2012

View PostWunderWurst, on 13 April 2018 - 06:51 PM, said:

 

Picking overall winrate as a balancing factor is one of the worst things you can do.

The Overall winrate vs tank winrate is MUCH MUCH MUCH better, the overall winrate can basically be ignored.

 

And have a look at the statistics yourself. The tanks is ridiculous OP. For once Wargamings "sledgehammer" balancing would actually make sense. Nerf that thing hard. REALLY HARD. If it wants to keep its armor it should not go faster than the JPE100, heck is should be slower since it got better armor.

Or nerf the armor into oblivion.

 

I think you completely misunderstood me. I was telling that guy that his opinion about 268 v4 "not needing a nerf" is a little bit funny. I mean just have a look at his tier 10 tanks.

 

 

Not quite sure how you understood my post but based on your reply I get the feeling you got some part wrong. To clarify I am very much in favor of battering the 268 v4(and quite a lot of other tanks) with the nerf bat.


Edited by D4wiD3K, 13 April 2018 - 08:51 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users