Jump to content


Why are the Types still a thing?


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

fanta_freake #1 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:33 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30541 battles
  • 75
  • [OVODK] OVODK
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011
title...

Enforcer1975 #2 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:34 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20973 battles
  • 10,935
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Which Type do you mean....?

Pansenmann #3 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:36 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34542 battles
  • 12,800
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View PostEnforcer1975, on 14 April 2018 - 10:34 AM, said:

Which Type do you mean....?

 

that is a reasonable question, I was about to ask myself.

 

My guess: Type 59



leggasiini #4 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:40 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 15209 battles
  • 6,237
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

bEcAuSe ThEy ArE uNiQuE aNd DiFfErEnT

 

The actual reason why they are the way they are now is because WG's current balance department is completely clueless with some decisions; Type 5 in especial being a great example. They should completely rework the armor layout, remove/nerf/rework the derp gun, and buff the 14cm AP gun, but no, that would make the tank too balanced, non-cancerous and non-p2w, so lets not do that.

 

I can't see them doing anything to the Types in foreseeable future. Lets at least hope they nerf the 268 V4; at least there is a some kind of chance of that happening.

 

EDIT: I assume the fact the OP means the Type 4/5, because he used term "Types" (so can't be the Type 59)


Edited by leggasiini, 14 April 2018 - 10:41 AM.


Hedgehog1963 #5 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:52 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51619 battles
  • 7,629
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

Because they make you dab the 2 key, which in the medium term makes WG more money.

 

Why is it necessary to point this out?


Edited by Hedgehog1963, 14 April 2018 - 10:52 AM.


CircleOfSorrow #6 Posted 14 April 2018 - 11:30 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29236 battles
  • 2,136
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012
I hope I get to at least experience the Type 5 before WG nerfs it into another dead-end that I didn't want when I started grinding the line.

Nethraniel #7 Posted 14 April 2018 - 11:48 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13535 battles
  • 2,234
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012
Type T-34 and Type 58 are not bad at all, still like the original russkies better. :trollface:

MaxxyNL #8 Posted 14 April 2018 - 11:53 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 980
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

View Postfanta_freake, on 14 April 2018 - 10:33 AM, said:

title...

 

Best topic ever. :facepalm:

malachi6 #9 Posted 14 April 2018 - 03:55 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 50462 battles
  • 3,704
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
I am not the type to normally ask what type you mean. But given you type to ask the type and type could be the class or the tier and type is a tank. The type of question lacks a type of focus. I am forced type which type do you mean?  Please type in response the type of type you intend.

Edited by malachi6, 14 April 2018 - 03:56 PM.


Strappster #10 Posted 14 April 2018 - 04:00 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25659 battles
  • 10,009
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015
I agree. The Type 61 should be buffed, preferably before I finish grinding the STA-1.

Jigabachi #11 Posted 14 April 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,594
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postfanta_freake, on 14 April 2018 - 10:33 AM, said:

title...

The title of your thread is "Why are the Types still a thing?"

You are supposed to type in the content of your thread there.

I hope that was helpful.



Thuis001 #12 Posted 14 April 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5981 battles
  • 466
  • [-SBN-] -SBN-
  • Member since:
    05-29-2015

View Postmalachi6, on 14 April 2018 - 03:55 PM, said:

I am not the type to normally ask what type you mean. But given you type to ask the type and type could be the class or the tier and type is a tank. The type of question lacks a type of focus. I am forced type which type do you mean?  Please type in response the type of type you intend.

 

type

Strappster #13 Posted 14 April 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25659 battles
  • 10,009
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015
Reply.

Lycopersicon #14 Posted 14 April 2018 - 07:21 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 10610 battles
  • 3,570
  • Member since:
    07-30-2014
Reminds me that I should play my Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai more often.

spuriousmonkey #15 Posted 14 April 2018 - 07:37 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 44728 battles
  • 3,362
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011

View PostLycopersicon, on 14 April 2018 - 08:21 PM, said:

Reminds me that I should play my Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai more often.

 

That thing ruins tier V gameplay.

MeetriX #16 Posted 14 April 2018 - 08:20 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 20973 battles
  • 2,859
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View Postleggasiini, on 14 April 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

 

EDIT: I assume the fact the OP means the Type 4/5, because he used term "Types" (so can't be the Type 59)

 

Japs have two types of 59s. 

 

This whole topic is silly type.



PervyPastryPuffer #17 Posted 14 April 2018 - 09:45 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 31605 battles
  • 2,400
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013
They're not my type... :sceptic:

lnfernaI #18 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:04 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 29220 battles
  • 3,700
  • [ALLGE] ALLGE
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012


theSwedishTankDriver #19 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24730 battles
  • 952
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    03-04-2013
russian pubbies

sgtYester #20 Posted 14 April 2018 - 10:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54758 battles
  • 1,686
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

WHY IS ARTY STILL A THING!!!

 

 

WITH HE BUFF ARTY IS ALMOST BACK TO OLD DAMAGE BUT WITH IMPROVED ACCURACY, FAST RELOAD, MORE CRITS (E.G. 2 CREW DEAD WITH 1 SHELL) BIGGER SPLASH (= ALWAYS DAMAGE)  AND STUN

 

HOW PPL COMPLAIN ABOUT TYPES AND OBJ 268-4 WHILE THIS CLASS AS A WHOLE IS CLEARLY OP AND BROKEN IS BEYOND ME






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users