Jump to content


Reinstate the previous score system to the forum


  • Please log in to reply
88 replies to this topic

Poll: Reinstate the previous score system to the forum (79 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should a voting system similar to that used on Reddit be used on our forum?

  1. Yes (50 votes [63.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 63.29%

  2. No (29 votes [36.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.71%

Vote Hide poll

CircleOfSorrow #1 Posted 16 April 2018 - 08:19 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28819 battles
  • 1,986
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012
I think that the previous score system should be reinstated, and that the score of the OP in a thread determines its position by rank on the forum (like reddit).  This would lead to only the most useful and entertaining threads being on the first page, and for the numerous sh%tposts to sink naturally.  Do you agree?

VeryRisky #2 Posted 16 April 2018 - 08:38 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 17129 battles
  • 8,529
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012
I miss the score just because I like to troll that you get a free M60 at +2000 (or some number safely above mine).

Corruption_Clan #3 Posted 16 April 2018 - 08:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45430 battles
  • 713
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

Or you could just go post on reddit

 

 



unhappy_bunny #4 Posted 17 April 2018 - 02:09 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17926 battles
  • 2,463
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012
No. The "qpranger likes" is the only valid rating system. 

Spurtung #5 Posted 17 April 2018 - 02:28 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61592 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 17 April 2018 - 03:09 AM, said:

No. The "qpranger likes" is the only valid rating system. 

 

There, I fixed the rating, it lacked the "downvote".

Strappster #6 Posted 17 April 2018 - 02:48 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,926
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

No because I don't see why someone should be down-voted simply for having a contrary opinion. If they fail to make a valid case for that opinion then by all means but certain children can't help but immediately spam the thumbs-down the moment they see something that's not part of their groupthink, then use that as "evidence" that the poster's opinion isn't valid.



Ceeb #7 Posted 17 April 2018 - 04:44 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30079 battles
  • 5,172
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 17 April 2018 - 01:09 AM, said:

No. The "qpranger likes" is the only valid rating system. 

 

​Liked my a troll account "qpranger_does_not"

 

Cute... real cute

 



unhappy_bunny #8 Posted 17 April 2018 - 05:26 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17926 battles
  • 2,463
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012
touché

shishx_who_is_rosa #9 Posted 17 April 2018 - 06:49 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 637 battles
  • 57
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    03-20-2018
It's like this so special snowflakes don't get offended when they get a huge pile of red, down pointing arrows attached to their imbecile posts. Welcome to the new era of safe zones for everyone, everywhere!

DA_ZOHAN #10 Posted 17 April 2018 - 07:17 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54043 battles
  • 1,578
  • [OZ77] OZ77
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

One of the main reasons why there are no more neg reps is the abuse of a bunch of fanny slapping dingers.

The ratings of each and every one of said dingers and ex dingers is fake news.  All of them simply pos rep each other, and neg rep any who disagree with one of them, and then gang up like a band of scavengers on those who dare post something that they don't like.

As if the forums belong to them, and not WG, and the entire player base.

 

*edit

 


Edited by Jbnn, 17 April 2018 - 09:37 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


SABAOTH #11 Posted 17 April 2018 - 07:20 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 36437 battles
  • 2,914
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 17 April 2018 - 02:09 AM, said:

No. The "qpranger likes" is the only valid rating system. 

 

I agree.

 

Best rating system in forums ever :medal:



HQ65 #12 Posted 17 April 2018 - 07:50 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28641 battles
  • 591
  • [CMERC] CMERC
  • Member since:
    01-16-2012

View PostCircleOfSorrow, on 16 April 2018 - 08:19 PM, said:

I think that the previous score system should be reinstated, and that the score of the OP in a thread determines its position by rank on the forum (like reddit).  This would lead to only the most useful and entertaining threads being on the first page, and for the numerous sh%tposts to sink naturally.  Do you agree?

 

But what if I like the numerous sh%t posts? That's what forums are for. Reading stupid posts and then making stupid comments,

 

(Please don't bash me, i am being ironic)



Strappster #13 Posted 17 April 2018 - 07:58 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,926
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostDA_ZOHAN, on 17 April 2018 - 06:54 AM, said:

here we go again.

The type of person I am.

 

I think you're an *edit, if that helps. It's got nothing to do with your nationality, beliefs, religion, whereabouts and how actively reserved you are. You seem to be a complete [edited]with zero self-awareness.

 

HTH :great:


Edited by Jbnn, 17 April 2018 - 09:30 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


DA_ZOHAN #14 Posted 17 April 2018 - 08:04 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54043 battles
  • 1,578
  • [OZ77] OZ77
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

View PostStrappster, on 17 April 2018 - 08:58 AM, said:

I think you're an *edit, if that helps. It's got nothing to do with your nationality, beliefs, religion, whereabouts and how actively reserved you are. You seem to be a complete [edited]with zero self-awareness.

 

HTH :great:

 

I don't really care.

 

OP starts a thread about re-instating the old ways, with neg reps and whatnot.  I answer.  Of course, this is against the hive of those that want to be able to dangle their mass neg repping and trolling of others as proof of them being right, and then you guys gang up again.

I didn't need proof, but here it is again.

I am certain that all of you reported me.  And rest assured that I have reported jabster and now you for personal attacks.

 

Just like the old days.

 

View Postjabster, on 17 April 2018 - 08:56 AM, said:

 

And there we go with your normal attitude.

 

And what is yours?

*edit


 

Edited by Jbnn, 19 April 2018 - 07:27 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Strappster #15 Posted 17 April 2018 - 08:13 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,926
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostDA_ZOHAN, on 17 April 2018 - 07:04 AM, said:

I am certain that all of you reported me.

 

For what? You haven't said anything I've found offensive or out of place, you've shared your thoughts and I've done likewise. I haven't reported you because it's not going to make you any less of an *edit.

 

View PostDA_ZOHAN, on 17 April 2018 - 07:04 AM, said:

And rest assured that I have reported jabster and now you for personal attacks.

 

Jolly good. Whatever helps you cope, princess.


Edited by Jbnn, 17 April 2018 - 09:43 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


DA_ZOHAN #16 Posted 17 April 2018 - 08:15 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54043 battles
  • 1,578
  • [OZ77] OZ77
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

View PostStrappster, on 17 April 2018 - 09:13 AM, said:

 

For what? You haven't said anything I've found offensive or out of place, you've shared your thoughts and I've done likewise. I haven't reported you because it's not going to make you any less of an *edit.

 

 

Jolly good. Whatever helps you cope, princess.

 

X2.  care to go for a X3 or X4?

Strappster #17 Posted 17 April 2018 - 08:18 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,926
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostDA_ZOHAN, on 17 April 2018 - 07:15 AM, said:

X2.  care to go for a X3 or X4?

 

No, I think those are a wrong direction for BMW. They should stick to rear-drive cars with great balance, not some soft-roader Chelsea tractor that only the criminally tasteless would consider driving.

 

Although kudos for you trying to threaten me through reports to the mods. You're going all out to confirm that *edit thing, aren't you. :great:


Edited by Jbnn, 17 April 2018 - 09:45 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Bora_BOOM #18 Posted 17 April 2018 - 09:50 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 21498 battles
  • 2,705
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

A wanted to continue highlighting important parts couple of more times, but I could not find any. It all became gibberish.



DA_ZOHAN #19 Posted 17 April 2018 - 09:56 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54043 battles
  • 1,578
  • [OZ77] OZ77
  • Member since:
    07-28-2013

View Postunhappy_bunny, on 17 April 2018 - 10:48 AM, said:

 

This thread was progressing quite nicely, people having a bit of fun, some semi-serious comments, some not so serious, but nothing offensive or insulting, until one person comes along and posts the above message.

Of course those insulted reply, at which point the writer of that message claims he is the victim and that everyone else started the fight.

 

What a Rodney.

 

​Years of experience.  It has nothing to do with claiming victimhood, I call it like it is.  It is a fact.  



Jbnn #20 Posted 17 April 2018 - 09:57 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 9225 battles
  • 617
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    05-23-2017
This thread has derailed completely. Please try to stick to main topic or I will have to close it.

PD: Nobody is using racial or religious hating in this thread so far, so please do not mention it. It might explode, as those are really dangerous topics that are against forum rules. 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users