Jump to content


Resurrected from the Archives: Polish Tanks


  • Please log in to reply
90 replies to this topic

RagingJedi #41 Posted 26 April 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16286 battles
  • 105
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
For everyone crying this tank is going to be weak, It's WG we're talking about here, I'd say it's going to get buffed before release :trollface:
what we need is a little side armour, engine and aim time buff.
Spoiler

Edited by RagingJedi, 26 April 2018 - 02:33 PM.


8126Jakobsson #42 Posted 26 April 2018 - 03:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 85454 battles
  • 6,310
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostWindSplitter1, on 25 April 2018 - 08:20 PM, said:

Great. Another premium heavy tank. Just what we needed to make Steve happy.

 

​Nonono. This is for Nowak. NowakPL. 

vuque #43 Posted 26 April 2018 - 04:15 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 19297 battles
  • 4,217
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010

View PostSharp1903, on 25 April 2018 - 10:29 PM, said:

Wall-E? :unsure:

 

 

Is this a name suggestion for the tank? :trollface:

Sharp1903 #44 Posted 26 April 2018 - 04:19 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 40821 battles
  • 2,654
  • [KAZMA] KAZMA
  • Member since:
    01-10-2014

View Postvuque, on 26 April 2018 - 06:15 PM, said:

 

Is this a name suggestion for the tank? :trollface:

 

Why not :) 

Dr_Ak #45 Posted 26 April 2018 - 05:40 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16496 battles
  • 11
  • [PRAHA] PRAHA
  • Member since:
    05-07-2017

I am sorry, but this is nonsense. There were no Polish tanks, like there were no Czechoslovakian ones after occupation in 1939. This game moves to Unreal one.

Any feature may have existed only in blueprints. Who will trust you now ? And what will you call "collector's gem" now ? Prototype which existed only in blueprints ? Why you have spent effort in designing more realistic noise of engines etc. ? Imaginery tanks may produce imaginary noise...

 

Why you don't introduce to the game the real current tank designs, if you want the community to grind more ? Let's simulate Korean war, Israel wars, Iraq-Iran war, Desert Storm war, Jugoslavian war or Syria war 2014 !

 



8126Jakobsson #46 Posted 26 April 2018 - 05:59 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 85454 battles
  • 6,310
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostSharp1903, on 26 April 2018 - 04:19 PM, said:

 

Why not :) 

 

Already taken by ELC EVEN, duh :P

KaisersNatron #47 Posted 26 April 2018 - 07:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13280 battles
  • 37
  • [D-K_M] D-K_M
  • Member since:
    03-28-2016

"Pulled out of our Arses: Polish Tanks"

 

I think this would be a much more appropriate title for this topic,espec especially when it comes to the "stage III" vehicles!

 

Can't imagine that any future tech tree will bother me even less than some totally fictional fantasy-heavies from the oh-so-proud tank-building nation of Poland...

 

Well... A comparably fictional clicker-techtree from - let's say new guinea?!?


Edited by OpaKnobbi, 26 April 2018 - 07:52 PM.


XEPOJ_CAKAH #48 Posted 26 April 2018 - 08:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11926 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011
Anything new is good, even if is blueprint tank. We all play make-believe Jap heavy's, right! So I give :great:​ for new tech tree.What I really was intrigued is mentioning of European tech tree. Anyone have any info about that? Any link?

King_of_Terrors #49 Posted 26 April 2018 - 10:45 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40198 battles
  • 160
  • [SITH-] SITH-
  • Member since:
    01-26-2015
Blueprints tanks why not? Wg made dreams of all engineers alive...in the past, they did not have the resources or the time to build these tanks...all players of the world of tanks need to feel how blessed they are ... we have free testing over the game all about which the engineers once dreamed a long time ago...

Personaly i cant wait for this tank to come on sale
 

soul3ater #50 Posted 27 April 2018 - 12:34 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21227 battles
  • 641
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

I will LOL if this tank is as broken as the defender.

 

the looks of all those who cried about the defender being sold in the last sale, that would be priceless lmao.



Zhu_Bajie #51 Posted 27 April 2018 - 02:48 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20142 battles
  • 113
  • [RSTY] RSTY
  • Member since:
    03-24-2013

not only would the combination of that upper hull armor, turret armor and gun depression be far too good, it also looks physically impossible that the gun breach would lift through the turret roof...

i know it is still only super test, but one can only worry at the thought of something monstrously op getting released again creeping the power even more past the older inferior tanks.



Midnightsun1912 #52 Posted 27 April 2018 - 07:34 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27249 battles
  • 299
  • [_RDA_] _RDA_
  • Member since:
    12-04-2013

View PostDr_Ak, on 26 April 2018 - 04:40 PM, said:

I am sorry, but this is nonsense. There were no Polish tanks, like there were no Czechoslovakian ones after occupation in 1939. This game moves to Unreal one.

Any feature may have existed only in blueprints. Who will trust you now ? And what will you call "collector's gem" now ? Prototype which existed only in blueprints ? Why you have spent effort in designing more realistic noise of engines etc. ? Imaginery tanks may produce imaginary noise...

 

Why you don't introduce to the game the real current tank designs, if you want the community to grind more ? Let's simulate Korean war, Israel wars, Iraq-Iran war, Desert Storm war, Jugoslavian war or Syria war 2014 !

 

 

The problem is that reality  conflicts with ideas and "blueprints". The real tank needs to work and has to be funded .Shortcuts must be made, unexpected  problems be sovled or entire concepts fail. There are "blueprints" out there for faster than light spaceships, or interstellar colonie ships  rather detailed even. Problem is that these are just detailed ideas. Worse even if weget another round of "new" "unreal" tanks from the 50ths competing with real tasnk designs.  I am asking myslef  if WG really ever used the wording "historically " in their decision in the past ....

_Sentinel_ #53 Posted 27 April 2018 - 10:09 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20165 battles
  • 403
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011

Great, just what we need! More overpowered fantasy tanks and broken tier 8 premiums that are stronger than the standard tanks.

 

View Postwolfsrain, on 27 April 2018 - 06:09 AM, said:

And they did more than okay.

 

None of the allies did more than okay. Don't let your national pride cloud your judgement.

 

View PostXEPOJ_CAKAH, on 26 April 2018 - 07:07 PM, said:

Anything new is good, even if is blueprint tank. We all play make-believe Jap heavy's, right!

 

No, we don't. You do "we" don't...

 

Would have been fine if we had a unified European tech tree with a few projects and real tanks from several European countries, but I guess WG figured out they want to milk several times more money by completely watering down the content of their game.


Edited by _Sentinel_, 27 April 2018 - 10:16 AM.


Iron_Snake #54 Posted 27 April 2018 - 10:24 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42850 battles
  • 801
  • [EFE-S] EFE-S
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
One day WG will remove all blueprinted, non-existed vehicles from the game or that historical mod will be on again. Trying to figure out, I love real things, kids love fantasy, why we are waiting for?

Sizaki #55 Posted 27 April 2018 - 10:47 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12925 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostGardar7, on 26 April 2018 - 12:54 PM, said:

 

I would say more like June-July.

 

I thought of the polish tech tree as a whole. Not the premium one. That'll be released around july I think.

Clearways #56 Posted 27 April 2018 - 11:42 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40084 battles
  • 258
  • Member since:
    08-31-2012

View PostWeak_man, on 25 April 2018 - 04:56 PM, said:

Any chance for romanian line in the future ?

 

​It depends: did any 12 year old Romanians  draw imaginary tanks on their school books?

 

View PostXEPOJ_CAKAH, on 26 April 2018 - 07:07 PM, said:

Anything new is good, even if is blueprint tank. We all play make-believe Jap heavy's, right! So I give :great:​ for new tech tree.What I really was intrigued is mentioning of European tech tree. Anyone have any info about that? Any link?

 

​All the Super heavies are make-believe, and they are all very bad for the game, and, no, we don't all play them, many of us detest them and will never even try them.
 

Thrael7 #57 Posted 27 April 2018 - 11:58 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24898 battles
  • 2,000
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-17-2012

View PostClearways, on 27 April 2018 - 12:42 PM, said:

It depends: did any 12 year old Romanians  draw imaginary tanks on their school books?

I 'm sure WG can find an old paper napkin with some obscure crayon drawing on it.



kaneloon #58 Posted 27 April 2018 - 02:13 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33183 battles
  • 4,695
  • [CROWD] CROWD
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

View PostIron_Snake, on 27 April 2018 - 09:24 AM, said:

One day WG will remove all blueprinted, non-existed vehicles from the game or that historical mod will be on again. Trying to figure out, I love real things, kids love fantasy, why we are waiting for?

 

If my memory is correct the "historical" mode was a big fail.

 

I certainly do not care about historical truth, it would be difficult to have balanced tanks.

 

But I don't feel right that they don t push new maps after a juicy chrismas and v1 problems instead of selling n€w £ank$ ...



WoT_RU_Doing #59 Posted 27 April 2018 - 05:09 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 62767 battles
  • 3,543
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

Personally I'm  not too impressed by this line. I dislike the inclusion of blueprint-only tanks in the game, and digging out someone's thesis is even further from reality. On the other hand, I look forward to the tech tree for Andorra or Luxemburg.

 

Seriously though, for all the excitement that a forthcoming line should generate, the fact that we are only on page 4 in this thread suggests that others aren't impressed enough to comment either.



LCpl_Jones #60 Posted 27 April 2018 - 06:31 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14559 battles
  • 1,458
  • Member since:
    06-17-2017

View PostPejovic72, on 27 April 2018 - 03:01 AM, said:

...This is INSULT for all of people,who read history.....

 

 

what history have you read ?

 

you're an embarrassment to yourself 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users