Jump to content


when is deliberate team damage and reports going to be taken seriously?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
13 replies to this topic

F2PEXP #1 Posted 25 April 2018 - 05:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3683 battles
  • 142
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018

*edit

 

thanks isu 152, gg

 

and he is a clan recruitment officer?

 

*edit

 

 


Edited by Jbnn, 26 April 2018 - 08:37 AM.


breeeze #2 Posted 25 April 2018 - 06:17 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30091 battles
  • 522
  • [S4] S4
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014
never.

TheJumpMaster #3 Posted 25 April 2018 - 06:27 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 47601 battles
  • 4,552
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
About the same time that as.... hmmm....... When peace breaks out in the Middle-East

Flavortown #4 Posted 25 April 2018 - 06:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16158 battles
  • 801
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    02-15-2015
Top tip, cover the names in paint or something to avoid locked topics

Laukaus #5 Posted 25 April 2018 - 06:42 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8551 battles
  • 120
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

There is an automatic friendly fire punishment system so reports are not needed. 

I think that this has been quite a clear rule for some years now. 

We should be glad that there is even one rule made by WG which WG itself follows. 



F2PEXP #6 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:44 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3683 battles
  • 142
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018

View PostLaukaus, on 25 April 2018 - 06:42 PM, said:

There is an automatic friendly fire punishment system so reports are not needed. 

I think that this has been quite a clear rule for some years now. 

We should be glad that there is even one rule made by WG which WG itself follows. 

 

and when does that ever do anything?

 

 

View PostFlavortown, on 25 April 2018 - 06:42 PM, said:

Top tip, cover the names in paint or something to avoid locked topics

 

​I am naming and shaming Wg
 

Indy_Bones #7 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:50 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29873 battles
  • 1,525
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    06-06-2011

View PostLaukaus, on 25 April 2018 - 05:42 PM, said:

There is an automatic friendly fire punishment system so reports are not needed. 

I think that this has been quite a clear rule for some years now. 

We should be glad that there is even one rule made by WG which WG itself follows. 

 

Except that if you know how to play the system, you can regularly shoot allies if you so choose.

 

Also laughable that I could theoretically do 6k damage to allies with an FV183 before I turn blue, whereas if I took the same 3 shots with a 907 it's only 900-1k damage before the same penalty...



F2PEXP #8 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3683 battles
  • 142
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018

View PostIndy_Bones, on 25 April 2018 - 07:50 PM, said:

 

Except that if you know how to play the system, you can regularly shoot allies if you so choose.

 

Also laughable that I could theoretically do 6k damage to allies with an FV183 before I turn blue, whereas if I took the same 3 shots with a 907 it's only 900-1k damage before the same penalty...

 

you know what, I am going to find out what it takes to get a 1 hour ban if I play smart and don't shoot 3 times in one game

kokek #9 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:58 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 20958 battles
  • 58
  • [SP_SQ] SP_SQ
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011
Nobody from WG reads EU forums btw

jack_timber #10 Posted 25 April 2018 - 08:05 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 33432 battles
  • 2,076
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014
152 is rather inaccurate... Remember a whiles ago aimed at a tank, fully aimed, missed but took out an unspotted tank beside him, maybe it was down to inaccurate shot or mebbe not didn't watch replay.

Balc0ra #11 Posted 25 April 2018 - 08:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66286 battles
  • 16,291
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

So what? You want them to take action and ban anyone for 1 shot? Or give them harder penalization? The 2nd one might work for deliberate action, but compensation is crap as is for the one that got it. But the system is still made for repeat offenders. Not 1 hit wonders. If they took action against the 1 hit wonders all the time. I suspect not many on this forum would not be around anymore.

 

Heck even I did 1K team damage today. A light flanked my target after I fired with my SU-152. And he took the HE shell up the rear plate for 1K. My fault? Not really, as the LT asked for support fire and did a 180 to double back around vs going around the corner like we thought he did. Arty even stunned him. As HE shells takes a few seconds to get there for us to "react".


Edited by Balc0ra, 25 April 2018 - 08:48 PM.


BravelyRanAway #12 Posted 25 April 2018 - 09:11 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22591 battles
  • 9,343
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostF2PEXP, on 25 April 2018 - 06:44 PM, said:

 

and when does that ever do anything?

 

Why don't you try it and see.;)



TheComfyChair #13 Posted 26 April 2018 - 02:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7612 battles
  • 748
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-20-2017

View PostTheJumpMaster, on 25 April 2018 - 06:27 PM, said:

About the same time that as.... hmmm....... When peace breaks out in the Middle-East

 

Wise words... I think it's always going to be a case of relying on karma :B

Jbnn #14 Posted 26 April 2018 - 08:42 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 9662 battles
  • 649
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    05-23-2017

View PostFlavortown, on 25 April 2018 - 05:42 PM, said:

Top tip, cover the names in paint or something to avoid locked topics

 

This.

Please, avoid posting screenshots of replays, naming and shaming other players in the forums. For unsportsmanlike conducts in game, you can send replay to customer support, and those players might get sanctioned for it. 

Thread closed and have a nice day.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users