Jump to content


Developers seem to think 1.0 was a great update, but what do a lot of players truly experience?

1.0 laggs bad

  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

NL_Jens #21 Posted 29 April 2018 - 04:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33344 battles
  • 45
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    03-14-2014

View PostEnforcer1975, on 29 April 2018 - 03:44 PM, said:

 

Link doesn't work. 

 

does it now? https://imgur.com/a/qnyZ07C
 

View PostYaccay, on 29 April 2018 - 03:56 PM, said:

The game got prettier.

Nevertheless I was able to play improved graphics in the past over or around 60 fps.

Now improved graphics means lower fps, often hitting 30 fps, which is not acceptable for me.

This is not in line with WG's promise. i.e: The client fps will not decrease.

I really do not like unfulfilled promises.

 

Yes, and players scoring 30 fps in the past instead of your 60, are now experiencing too much lagg unless they make an insane step back in graphics. Way worse than they played on before 1.0
 

vixu #22 Posted 29 April 2018 - 04:08 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 41310 battles
  • 2,912
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

I think it is a step int he right direction.

- Graphics did became better in my books even if I don't use best settings, but it did allow some new capabilities when creating maps. 

- Maps were redesigned, which is good. 

- However, it feels that old maps were way more balanced then the new ones. At least, in many maps the game play has totally changed due to major changes in possible cover.

 

Overall, they should fix the bugs work on maps more, but it is a decent update.


 



Enforcer1975 #23 Posted 29 April 2018 - 04:12 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 18943 battles
  • 9,989
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostNL_Jens, on 29 April 2018 - 04:01 PM, said:

 

does it now? https://imgur.com/a/qnyZ07C

 

Well....it's a max. 2.8GHz dual core with integrated graphics....that is even worse than potato. 

 



xtram3x #24 Posted 29 April 2018 - 04:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31095 battles
  • 1,305
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013

View PostNL_Jens, on 29 April 2018 - 03:01 PM, said:

 

does it now? https://imgur.com/a/qnyZ07C

 

 

Complains potato can't run updated game with full settings... Blames the game.

 

Good job



apaleytos #25 Posted 29 April 2018 - 05:33 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15166 battles
  • 195
  • Member since:
    06-26-2012

Graphics are really nice,everything else crap....

 

From camping maps ,shitty MM,broken tanks yolowagons etc.But it is up to us how to make our gameplay experience more fun.For example i go arty hunting from the beginning or yolo scout with my super pershing ( prokhorovka forest im coming :trollface:).

 

Since the developers dont show any sign wanting to balance / improve things and dedicating resources into soon dead gamemodes,we have to either quit or make it enjoyable.Join a friendly clan,platoon,play broken tanks like types,yolowagons,obj430U.If you can handle eating and playing,sniping with arty all these broken tanks is fun experience also.


Edited by apaleytos, 29 April 2018 - 05:35 PM.


Bordhaw #26 Posted 29 April 2018 - 06:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9850 battles
  • 1,456
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostMr_Burrows, on 29 April 2018 - 12:24 PM, said:

Yeah, like getting hit for 430 HP from behind, and the only indication you get is that you HP bar drops. Amazingly bad not having such an easy thing sorted. Just for example. 

 

Well it took 8 years to get out of "beta" phase

wsatnutter #27 Posted 29 April 2018 - 06:52 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24080 battles
  • 7,084
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
make sure you Pc is cool and its optimized and don't give it negative waves





Also tagged with 1.0, laggs, bad

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users