Jump to content


Badge for killing enemies through map physics.

badge medal

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

Poll: New badge idea. (17 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Physics kill badge is:

  1. a good addition to the collection. (5 votes [29.41%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 29.41%

  2. no less meaningless than the other badges, but go ahead. (8 votes [47.06%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 47.06%

  3. as meaningless as the other badges, so forget it. (3 votes [17.65%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 17.65%

  4. a truly bad idea that should be forgotten. (1 vote [5.88%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

Vote Hide poll

BP_OMowe #1 Posted 30 April 2018 - 04:47 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24757 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

Since there are badges for killing enemies through fires, ammo-rack explosions and ramming (higher tiers), it would be nice to have some badge for when you are credited a kill through drowning/falling simply because they are so rarely occurring events.

 

[Sidenote, how many extra threads of this one were created?!]


Edited by BP_OMowe, 30 April 2018 - 10:16 PM.


Homer_J #2 Posted 30 April 2018 - 05:15 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27085 battles
  • 27,736
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

I'll take a mix of option 2 and 3.

 

It would be as meaningless as the other badges so why not.

 

Everyone likes getting shiny things at random.



Condono #3 Posted 30 April 2018 - 05:25 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10022 battles
  • 422
  • [13KIL] 13KIL
  • Member since:
    11-05-2011
What happened to this guy? Spamming?

Pansenmann #4 Posted 30 April 2018 - 05:28 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33273 battles
  • 12,043
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

looks like some browser hickup.

I think we should keep this thread.



jack_timber #5 Posted 30 April 2018 - 06:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31194 battles
  • 1,606
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014
I think we should keep all 3:)

Capus #6 Posted 30 April 2018 - 06:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012

Yes, instead of fixing balance, maps etc WG should devote time into making a full proof detection system for some completely useless pixel badges.

 

Also, spamming the forum with the same thread over and over won't get you any sympathy here, instead of looking like someone with a genuine question it makes you look more like a toddler in the shop tugging your pants over and over asking if he can have some candy.


Edited by Capus, 30 April 2018 - 06:45 PM.


250swb #7 Posted 30 April 2018 - 06:49 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20795 battles
  • 4,590
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Falling is ramming, but drowning could be an option.

BP_OMowe #8 Posted 30 April 2018 - 09:36 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24757 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

View PostCapus, on 30 April 2018 - 06:43 PM, said:

Yes, instead of fixing balance, maps etc WG should devote time into making a full proof detection system for some completely useless pixel badges.

 

Also, spamming the forum with the same thread over and over won't get you any sympathy here, instead of looking like someone with a genuine question it makes you look more like a toddler in the shop tugging your pants over and over asking if he can have some candy.

 

Since you appear to lack even the simplest deduction skills, I'll just inform you that threads starting with things like  "1;WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:1'--"  instead of the written OP tends to be a sign of malfunction and not an indication of spam.

 

Further refuting your ill-informed opinion, there is already a detection system in place, as the tool-tip on the Battle result screen already informs you how the enemy died. All needed is linking such an already detected event to a badge, which might detract a whole 15 man-minutes of effort.

 

View PostCondono, on 30 April 2018 - 05:25 PM, said:

What happened to this guy? Spamming?

View PostPansenmann, on 30 April 2018 - 05:28 PM, said:

looks like some browser hickup.

I think we should keep this thread.

View Postjack_timber, on 30 April 2018 - 06:12 PM, said:

I think we should keep all 3:)

 

Looks more like a server-side malfunction. I've reported the other three threads to be deleted.

 

View PostHomer_J, on 30 April 2018 - 05:15 PM, said:

I'll take a mix of option 2 and 3.

 

It would be as meaningless as the other badges so why not.

 

Everyone likes getting shiny things at random.

 

Something like that was my line of reasoning as well.

 

View Post250swb, on 30 April 2018 - 06:49 PM, said:

Falling is ramming, but drowning could be an option.

 

It is? I really need to have a closer look at the battle results.

Edited by BP_OMowe, 01 May 2018 - 01:15 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Bordhaw #9 Posted 30 April 2018 - 10:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9581 battles
  • 1,214
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostCapus, on 30 April 2018 - 05:43 PM, said:

Yes, instead of fixing balance, maps etc WG should devote time into making a full proof detection system for some completely useless pixel badges.

 

Also, spamming the forum with the same thread over and over won't get you any sympathy here, instead of looking like someone with a genuine question it makes you look more like a toddler in the shop tugging your pants over and over asking if he can have some candy.

 

:)

Aikl #10 Posted 30 April 2018 - 11:09 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,029
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

I don't see any reason why you can't post it straight in the suggestions thread. Shiny medals are fun. I rather enjoy "collecting" Kamikaze medals, for instance - they also massively boost my Rush/Raubtier/Righteousness Rating.

 

The only real argument against them would be people messing up a game because they want a badge - which is kind of unlikely when you consider some of the other 'weird' tokens we have. 'Invader', 'Raider' and the survival strikes.



Capus #11 Posted 01 May 2018 - 02:18 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012

View PostBP_OMowe, on 30 April 2018 - 08:36 PM, said:

 

Since you are a fully *edit with lack of even the simplest deduction skills

 

At least I'm a polite and civilised person. It's not my fault that they dropped me at birth, what's your excuse?

BP_OMowe #12 Posted 01 May 2018 - 04:10 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24757 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

View PostCapus, on 01 May 2018 - 02:18 AM, said:

At least I'm a polite and civilised person. It's not my fault that they dropped me at birth, what's your excuse?

 

A gentleman does not need an excuse to be polite.

BP_OMowe #13 Posted 01 May 2018 - 01:27 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24757 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

View Post250swb, on 30 April 2018 - 06:49 PM, said:

Falling is ramming, but drowning could be an option.

 

Right, I took a screenshot of the Battle Result tool-tip, and here is what it says:

Enemy destroyed

Counted:

* Destruction by a shot

* Destruction by fire

* Destruction by ramming

* Destruction by drowning

* Destruction by pushing the enemy vehicle off an obstacle

* Destruction by overturning

 

Enemy vehicle destroyed by [specified]

 

 



BP_OMowe #14 Posted 03 May 2018 - 10:27 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24757 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013
Well, least all the extra threads are now gone,





Also tagged with badge, medal

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users