Jump to content


SUGGESTION BALANCE TIER 10


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

Hunt3r_Supr3m0 #1 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40213 battles
  • 190
  • [NARCO] NARCO
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

If WG doesnt want to nerf the most OP tanks like 268 v4, 907 or type.. to not make angry owners why dont buf the others? i was thinking about it and i have some suggestions.

There the list for each tank:

for the ligths tanks should increase view range only.

 

MEDS:

e50m: increase reload time gun

121: increase to -7 depresion gun and hull armour 

amx 30B: make more stronger turret or smaller like patton

bat chat: buff dispersion gun in movement and increase pen in gold.

leopard: increase camo and only frontal turret armour

m60, 121B  and t95e6 buff with new stats of supertest

stb1: only increase horsepower/ weigth

t62a: increase frontal hull armour

t22 med, buff reload time gun

pattonm48 obj140 , obj430U, 907  tvp  keep it, no changes

 

Heavies:

Amx 50B, increase only turret armour like kravagn.

amx m4, buff GOLD pen of big gun

E100, increase frontal turret armour

Maus: increase ROF gun

fv215:  give same turret like S.conqueror

is4: increase armour turret only

kravagn, buff reload time between shots

obj260, buff hull armour

PZVII and vk7201: buff side armours so we can do sidecraping:

t110e5: increase reverse speed and make smaller cupola like m48patton:

t57 heavy, increase reverse speed

is7, spconqueror, 113, wz111 5a, type 5, 705A    keep them, no changes

 

TDS:

Grille 15, increase reverse speed and maybe 180º  arc gun like t110e4

JZe100: buff ROF gun, reload time to 18-20 sec and increase reverse speed.

obj268 increase reverse speed

T110E3 AND T110E4: INCREASE REVERSE SPEED, OMG

The rest, both amx, fv, badger, obj268 V4, strv 103 keep them, NO changes.

 

ARTIES:

i will no comment here... there are a lot of threads of arties.

That is alls, what do you think?, your opinion? and pls no OFF TOPIC.

Balance departament, should pay me to do their job.


Edited by Hunt3r_Supr3m0, 02 May 2018 - 12:50 PM.


Enforcer1975 #2 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:34 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20646 battles
  • 10,559
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Yes please.....make it literally impossible for tier tier 8 tanks to even think of engaging a tier 10 when they are cornered...

ripfactory #3 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 251 battles
  • 137
  • Member since:
    07-12-2017
go away with your countless armor buff suggestions you utter clown

Balc0ra #4 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:41 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64400 battles
  • 15,436
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
I stopped reading at the T-22 reverse nerf. Cus having all tanks like the new Obj helps right? It's like fighting fire with fire, no one can pen each other.

Edited by Balc0ra, 02 May 2018 - 12:42 PM.


Laukaus #5 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8309 battles
  • 120
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostHunt3r_Supr3m0, on 02 May 2018 - 11:31 AM, said:

If WG doesnt want to nerf the most OP tanks like 268 v4, 907 or type.. to not make angry owners why dont buf the others? 

NO, NO, NO, NO and NO!!!

 

Assigning OP tanks against non-OP is one of WG's methods to make sure that "games" are short. 



Nishi_Kinuyo #6 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:54 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 7478 battles
  • 3,906
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View PostHunt3r_Supr3m0, on 02 May 2018 - 12:31 PM, said:

If WG doesnt want to nerf the most OP tanks like 268 v4, 907 or type.. to not make angry owners why dont buf the others? i was thinking about it and i have some suggestions.

There the list for each tank:

for the ligths tanks should increase view range only.

 

MEDS:

stb1: only increase horsepower/ weigth

u wot m8?

 

Seriously though, the buff that the STB-1 needs most is one in gun handling and maybe aimtime to keep it consistent with the rest of the line.

Tier 3-8 Japanese mediums have some of the best gun handlings for medium tanks of their tier, and they lose that at tier 9 and 10 for whatever reason.



HeidenSieker #7 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 10046 battles
  • 4,648
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View PostHunt3r_Supr3m0, on 02 May 2018 - 12:31 PM, said:

If WG doesnt want to nerf the most OP tanks

 

How are they OP? Surely with team tactics (and the use of SPGs) it is possible to deal with them efficiently?

Hunt3r_Supr3m0 #8 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:57 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40213 battles
  • 190
  • [NARCO] NARCO
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 02 May 2018 - 12:54 PM, said:

u wot m8?

 

Seriously though, the buff that the STB-1 needs most is one in gun handling and maybe aimtime to keep it consistent with the rest of the line.

Tier 3-8 Japanese mediums have some of the best gun handlings for medium tanks of their tier, and they lose that at tier 9 and 10 for whatever reason.

Maybe, i am not sure about stb1 i dont have it, but i saw that its guns miss a lot maybe buff aim time.



lonigus #9 Posted 02 May 2018 - 12:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 32631 battles
  • 7,996
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

"Amx 50B, increase only turret armour like kravagn"

 

LOL. Among many other suggestions, this got me laughing the most! :D 

 

A "French" Kranvagn with a much better penetration, speed and gun handling. Sign me in! :D

 


Edited by lonigus, 02 May 2018 - 12:59 PM.


Hunt3r_Supr3m0 #10 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:00 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40213 battles
  • 190
  • [NARCO] NARCO
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostHeidenSieker, on 02 May 2018 - 12:57 PM, said:

 

How are they OP? Surely with team tactics (and the use of SPGs) it is possible to deal with them efficiently?

Man, i dont say if they are OP or not, DONT BLAME ME,

MAYBE you should stop cry and learn to play and aim... you can pen all them tanks.

I dont care about if they are op or not , i know how to deal with them...

However there are a lot of new cry post all days from kids.



Hunt3r_Supr3m0 #11 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:02 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40213 battles
  • 190
  • [NARCO] NARCO
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View Postlonigus, on 02 May 2018 - 12:58 PM, said:

"Amx 50B, increase only turret armour like kravagn"

 

LOL. Among many other suggestions, this got me laughing the most! :D 

 

A "French" Kranvagn with a much better penetration, speed and gun handling. Sign me in! :D

 

 

But not too much armour buff, only a bit. like 200-250 armour.



lonigus #12 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:08 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 32631 battles
  • 7,996
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View PostHunt3r_Supr3m0, on 02 May 2018 - 01:02 PM, said:

 

But not too much armour buff, only a bit. like 200-250 armour.

 

What would be the balancing factor in return? You are suggesting a 100% - 150% buff to the turret armor. :unsure:

 

I dont think the buffs to armor is a good balancing idea. :hiding:


Edited by lonigus, 02 May 2018 - 01:09 PM.


Y_O_L_0 #13 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19186 battles
  • 906
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012
Only premium tanks have that "no nerf" policy, so CW reward tanks could be nerfed without problem. Now, if it comes to the 907, it probably won't be nerfed cause it is Russian. But if the T95E6 would be overpowered, WG would nerf it instantly cause you know, it's not Russian.

Enforcer1975 #14 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:09 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20646 battles
  • 10,559
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View Postlonigus, on 02 May 2018 - 01:08 PM, said:

 

What would be the balancing factor in return? You are suggesting a 100% - 150% buff to the turret armor. :unsure:

 

I dont think the buffs to armor is a good balancing idea. :hiding:

 

Omg i see a rare specimen...

Thejagdpanther #15 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:11 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 34099 battles
  • 4,339
  • [TKBS] TKBS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2012
Thank god wg don't come on forums to take "advices".

lonigus #16 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:12 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 32631 battles
  • 7,996
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

View PostEnforcer1975, on 02 May 2018 - 01:09 PM, said:

 

Omg i see a rare specimen...

 

Bored at work :hiding:

Voja_DaRealMVP #17 Posted 02 May 2018 - 01:30 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 38905 battles
  • 51
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    04-15-2012
This 45%er just want's more op tanks so that he can compensate for his lack of braincells. Seriously i doubt that even a 45%er could have came up with suggestions as dumb as these.

Cannes76 #18 Posted 02 May 2018 - 03:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 64526 battles
  • 1,616
  • [3V] 3V
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

Pretty bad suggestions all around. A few tanks could use a buff, but not like you suggest!

Leopard should receive a gun handling buff, not an armor buff just to name one.



leggasiini #19 Posted 02 May 2018 - 03:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12400 battles
  • 6,072
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Hahahahahah.

 

No.

 

Sorry, but most of these suggestions are just terrible.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users