Jump to content


New Encore Engine Requirements @1920x1080 Resolution


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

smokeytheband1t #1 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8454 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    12-05-2016

Building a new mid range rig as my old system is really just done for.. wondering if this system will run the new engine smoothly and what detail settings would be it's limit.. will be playing at 1920x1080 resolution

 

new system specs :

 

AMD Ryzen 5 2400g Quadcore @3.6 Ghz

MSI A320M Grenade Mobo

8 GB DDR4 2133 MHZ

GTX1050Ti 4B

 

 

 



Coopsjc21 #2 Posted 16 May 2018 - 10:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8826 battles
  • 729
  • Member since:
    07-14-2015
Arent 2nd gen Ryzens either out or out soon, maybe worth holding out on a build?

MaxxyNL #3 Posted 16 May 2018 - 10:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 980
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

View Postsmokeytheband1t, on 16 May 2018 - 10:59 PM, said:

Building a new mid range rig as my old system is really just done for.. wondering if this system will run the new engine smoothly and what detail settings would be it's limit.. will be playing at 1920x1080 resolution

 

new system specs :

 

AMD Ryzen 5 2400g Quadcore @3.6 Ghz

MSI A320M Grenade Mobo

8 GB DDR4 2133 MHZ

GTX1050Ti 4B

 

 

 

 

You should be able to play it on High/Ultra without any problems. :honoring:

 

I would only improve your RAM. Ryzen likes fast ram.



smokeytheband1t #4 Posted 16 May 2018 - 11:23 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8454 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    12-05-2016

View PostMaxxyNL, on 16 May 2018 - 10:25 PM, said:

 

You should be able to play it on High/Ultra without any problems. :honoring:

 

I would only improve your RAM. Ryzen likes fast ram.

 

Yes i will at some point.. but for now it will suffice..thanks for the feedback :p

jack_timber #5 Posted 17 May 2018 - 07:03 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 33893 battles
  • 2,140
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

As a comparison....

Having recently built a new system, Ryzen 5 (6 core) and a 1060 GPU I can now run every setting on max and get 110 FPS @ 1920 X 1080.

I know it's more expense but adding an SSD would help with loading times into battle for WoT, I fitted a 120gb big enough for Windows and WoT.

Using HDD used to load in 0 to 15 seconds after battle had started now, using SSD, awaiting countdown clock to start.

 



rsanders5 #6 Posted 17 May 2018 - 09:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26339 battles
  • 505
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

This setup runs on ultra at 70+ fps

Operating System
    Windows 10 Home 64-bit
CPU
    Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4.00GHz  
    Haswell 22nm Technology
RAM
    16.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
    MSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916) (SOCKET 0)   
Graphics
    G2460 (1920x1080@60Hz)
    2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (MSI)  
    2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (MSI)   
    ForceWare version: 397.64
    SLI Enabled



VonKafe #7 Posted 17 May 2018 - 11:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20411 battles
  • 249
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011
Don't buy Ryzen 2400G, get a 1600X/2600 instead. Why would you pay for a decent iGPU when you will use the 1050Ti. You should consider getting a 1060 3GB or 6GB, 1050Ti ins't bad but it's basically gaming low end.

Warzey #8 Posted 18 May 2018 - 12:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57168 battles
  • 953
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostVonKafe, on 17 May 2018 - 10:08 PM, said:

Don't buy Ryzen 2400G, get a 1600X/2600 instead. Why would you pay for a decent iGPU when you will use the 1050Ti. You should consider getting a 1060 3GB or 6GB, 1050Ti ins't bad but it's basically gaming low end.

 

You would be surprised what kind of performance you can get out of "low end" cards these days. 

Besides GTX 1060s and RX 570/580 are quite a bit more expensive than 1050ti at least in Serbia.


Edited by Warzey, 18 May 2018 - 12:53 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users