Jump to content


on this warhammer scandal


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

ilosz #1 Posted 19 May 2018 - 10:22 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14315 battles
  • 1,421
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

I simply don't understand why they didn't put these two tanks in the game instead of releasing a skin for something that no one uses and a tank which offers not so much benefits over the version that's already in the game.

 



Balc0ra #2 Posted 19 May 2018 - 10:50 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66533 battles
  • 16,573
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Could be cus they were more broken then the valkyria chronicles tanks. I mean, one is more or less just a wandering spaced armor plate. Heat will have -2000 pen before they reach the armor on the other side with that gap.

ilosz #3 Posted 19 May 2018 - 11:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14315 battles
  • 1,421
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 19 May 2018 - 10:50 PM, said:

Could be cus they were more broken then the valkyria chronicles tanks. I mean, one is more or less just a wandering spaced armor plate. Heat will have -2000 pen before they reach the armor on the other side with that gap.

 

That is quite possible, but business wise it would have been a better decision as it would have opened the game to a different target audience. 

Edited by ilosz, 19 May 2018 - 11:01 PM.


K_A #4 Posted 20 May 2018 - 08:41 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13643 battles
  • 4,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View Postilosz, on 19 May 2018 - 10:01 PM, said:

 

That is quite possible, but business wise it would have been a better decision as it would have opened the game to a different target audience. 

 

A "better decision" that would have also alienated a vast amount of older, already continuously paying player base. EU players in particular has always been very openly vocal against unhistorical designs and clown tanks. The outcry over something THAT stupidly unrealistic would be huge.

Nethraniel #5 Posted 20 May 2018 - 09:11 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13505 battles
  • 2,127
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

The KV-2 skin can be turned off by individual players in the settings.

These two tanks would be permanent.



ilosz #6 Posted 20 May 2018 - 10:29 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14315 battles
  • 1,421
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostK_A, on 20 May 2018 - 08:41 AM, said:

 

A "better decision" that would have also alienated a vast amount of older, already continuously paying player base. EU players in particular has always been very openly vocal against unhistorical designs and clown tanks. The outcry over something THAT stupidly unrealistic would be huge.

 

View PostNethraniel, on 20 May 2018 - 09:11 AM, said:

The KV-2 skin can be turned off by individual players in the settings.

These two tanks would be permanent.

 

Fair points, in this sense KV-2 was a more sensible choice for the three wargaming owned pc servers.

Jigabachi #7 Posted 20 May 2018 - 11:16 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17946 battles
  • 19,296
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
It should be VERY easy to understand why they didn't put those into the game. Blitz is a shitty mobile game that nobody takes any serious. If they would introduce them here, hell would break loose even further, for obvious reasons.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users