Jump to content


Using Bonds to complete Campaign missions

Bonds Campaign

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

slitth #1 Posted 23 May 2018 - 07:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12132 battles
  • 1,045
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011

Good old Campaign missions.

Some say they are the reason why some players play artillery.

Or force players to play other classes they do not like.

 

We could change that with Bonds.

 

Let's say that you can complete a mission for 200 Bonds, but if you want to complete it with honours you still have to play.

That way you could complete a tank class for the cost of 3000 Bonds.

 

Yes, I know that will turn the reward tanks into something you can get with Bonds.

But that will cost 15.000 Bonds per tank. That a lot of Bonds.

 

But at least it will give players a another way to grind Campaign missions, by grinding Bonds.

 

 

 

 



Suurpolskija #2 Posted 23 May 2018 - 07:35 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18698 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016
I accept the challenge and the rng of personal missions. I don't want them to be completed by simple bond grinding.

NUKLEAR_SLUG #3 Posted 23 May 2018 - 07:38 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 30589 battles
  • 2,584
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
It would be an option for those that do want to trade bonds that way tho, I see no harm in it.

BSHDBCG #4 Posted 23 May 2018 - 07:48 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5647 battles
  • 459
  • Member since:
    04-20-2015
Do you then get the bonds back if you later complete it with honours? :P

250swb #5 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:19 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 23160 battles
  • 5,276
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
They aren't compulsory so why bother doing missions at all if you don't want to accept the challenge? Yes OK you and others don't like playing arty, but with the constant whine about what arty do wrong you'd think being forced to play arty would be an opportunity for the average know-all to show how arty should be played? 

Edited by 250swb, 23 May 2018 - 08:20 AM.


HundeWurst #6 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:21 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 70668 battles
  • 4,388
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

Do whatever you want at this point. Its not like it was super duper hard to ever get the tanks. It was more or less only down to RNG.

Now they lowered the RNG and made things even easier to get.

These tanks are hardly "rewards tanks" these days, they are to bad and to easy to get. So why not just throw them out there for every hardcore grinder to get their hands on one?

 

 



Geno1isme #7 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:25 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 44131 battles
  • 8,579
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
We already have orders for that, no need to add a second currency into the mix.

kaneloon #8 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:38 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28753 battles
  • 1,964
  • [OBLIC] OBLIC
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

View PostHundeWurst, on 23 May 2018 - 07:21 AM, said:

Do whatever you want at this point. Its not like it was super duper hard to ever get the tanks. It was more or less only down to RNG.

Now they lowered the RNG and made things even easier to get.

These tanks are hardly "rewards tanks" these days, they are to bad and to easy to get. So why not just throw them out there for every hardcore grinder to get their hands on one?

 

 

 

no hard though but easy is a relative concept ;)

 

Plus it was another arty whine thread.

 

Btw OP I play arty because I like to play arty, and it is those missions I finish first :P



Igor_BL #9 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41332 battles
  • 1,480
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015

View PostHundeWurst, on 23 May 2018 - 08:21 AM, said:

Do whatever you want at this point. Its not like it was super duper hard to ever get the tanks. It was more or less only down to RNG.

Now they lowered the RNG and made things even easier to get.

These tanks are hardly "rewards tanks" these days, they are to bad and to easy to get. So why not just throw them out there for every hardcore grinder to get their hands on one?

 

 

 

agree... we might add lottery every weekend.

 

about 2nd season of personal missions we discussed several times. I had a thought few days ago... probably the main reason they dont introduce season 2 for years, is it would cause infestation of credits among the older/experienced players. We have optimal tanks for variety of missions, full garage of those.
and the current missions are plain easy (at least first 3 sets), the good player wouldnt need a lot of time to earn tens of milions of credits.
and also, season 2 would help new players a lot, who still struggle with season 1 missions (as they declared after season2 is ON, season 1 missions will still be available).

 

so, probably, all this season2 story isnt about their incompetence to make 300 missions and choose rewards for those... nobody needs years for that.

it is probably economic decision... less credits, more premium time and tanks needed...


Edited by Igor_BL, 23 May 2018 - 08:41 AM.


Ceeb #10 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:40 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31008 battles
  • 5,458
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View Postslitth, on 23 May 2018 - 06:24 AM, said:

Good old Campaign missions.

Some say they are the reason why some players play artillery.

Or force players to play other classes they do not like.

 

We could change that with Bonds.

 

Let's say that you can complete a mission for 200 Bonds, but if you want to complete it with honours you still have to play.

That way you could complete a tank class for the cost of 3000 Bonds.

 

Yes, I know that will turn the reward tanks into something you can get with Bonds.

But that will cost 15.000 Bonds per tank. That a lot of Bonds.

 

But at least it will give players a another way to grind Campaign missions, by grinding Bonds.

 

 

 

 

 

​I see no issues, 15000 bonds per tank is still a hell of a grind with less RNG than the personal missions.

 

 



slitth #11 Posted 23 May 2018 - 08:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12132 battles
  • 1,045
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011

Sorry to disappoint but there is no artillery whine here.

I play artillery and don't mind its presence in the game.

 

But not all players feel the same.

Other may have problem with the light tanks missions.

 

This is just a way to help people complete the missions.

There might even be the possibility that you complete some the the missions while grinding the Bonds.

 

And no you do not get the bonds back if you complete the mission.

You complete the mission one way or the other, you just get to choose how.



NoobySkooby #12 Posted 23 May 2018 - 10:42 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 15177 battles
  • 3,840
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View Post250swb, on 23 May 2018 - 08:19 AM, said:

They aren't compulsory so why bother doing missions at all if you don't want to accept the challenge? Yes OK you and others don't like playing arty, but with the constant whine about what arty do wrong you'd think being forced to play arty would be an opportunity for the average know-all to show how arty should be played? 

 

I find the challenge the light tanks on lvl15 of the stug 4 totally impossible, that said I prefer heavies and TD's to lights.

TheR3dBaron #13 Posted 23 May 2018 - 10:56 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 34761 battles
  • 3,020
  • [REMY] REMY
  • Member since:
    01-22-2013

View PostNoobySkooby, on 23 May 2018 - 10:42 AM, said:

 

I find the challenge the light tanks on lvl15 of the stug 4 totally impossible, that said I prefer heavies and TD's to lights.

 

The light tanks mission is the only one I have completed for the Object 260, but it does require a good crew to complete.

 

Judging by your statistics, you are however struggling with some of the basic game concepts. You have an extraordinary amount of premium tanks and high-level ones for that matter. 148 battles in the FV4202 with an avearge damage of 124 and a WN8 of 0 is a bit of a problem.

 

Having said that, you seem to clearly enjoy the game, but I'd try to pick up on a few tutorials first. You don't have to stick at tier 1 - 2, but given the fact you fail to get out of black WN8 for 85% of your tanks, I suggest reading up a lot.



Somnorila #14 Posted 23 May 2018 - 11:05 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 56023 battles
  • 2,043
  • [4-YOU] 4-YOU
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

View PostTheR3dBaron, on 23 May 2018 - 10:56 AM, said:

 

The light tanks mission is the only one I have completed for the Object 260, but it does require a good crew to complete.

 

Judging by your statistics, you are however struggling with some of the basic game concepts. You have an extraordinary amount of premium tanks and high-level ones for that matter. 148 battles in the FV4202 with an avearge damage of 124 and a WN8 of 0 is a bit of a problem.

 

Having said that, you seem to clearly enjoy the game, but I'd try to pick up on a few tutorials first. You don't have to stick at tier 1 - 2, but given the fact you fail to get out of black WN8 for 85% of your tanks, I suggest reading up a lot.

 

The missions are doable but are too random o get. At obj260 i'm at 15 for LT and SPG and like 10-12 for the rest. I would have enough to buy 3 but i still need 2 to make. At this stage i kind of lost hope and will probably reach 15 with all until i make the LT and SPG. Not like i haven't been able to make them, as i almost made them several times but either didn't paid attention and didn't race for a few hundred assist or damage or in the case of SPG placed second by xp.

It would had been much more fair and easy if missions would had not been required to activate. And whenever you would had check the requirements you would had accomplished whatever missions out there. This way you could make even several on one match and not just one.



etody77 #15 Posted 23 May 2018 - 11:47 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 64765 battles
  • 946
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

it's not a bad idea, to have the choice to finish some missions with bonds, but...

for every campaign only five mssions, 1 per class, with no bonds as reward 

just an option to buy an order with bonds

 



Balc0ra #16 Posted 23 May 2018 - 11:49 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67496 battles
  • 17,182
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Yeah, lets make it even easier and more pointless to have anyone of them.

 

And 200? For real? Considering how easy it is atm to farm them playing tier X with all the equal tier games there. It should be 1500 at the least IMO. Considering how hard and rare it is to get orders to skip then, bonds should not be easier.



Ceeb #17 Posted 23 May 2018 - 11:54 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31008 battles
  • 5,458
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

View PostNoobySkooby, on 23 May 2018 - 09:42 AM, said:

 

I find the challenge the light tanks on lvl15 of the stug 4 totally impossible, that said I prefer heavies and TD's to lights.

 

​Found the lights easy. need LT 15 for the 260.

 

Lights used. WZ 131, M41 Bulldog, Type 64 (for a lot of them), T-100-LT and WZ 132A for the higher missions.

 

Heavies (don't play) Mediums ,(struggle with at high tiers) 

 

Arty... Will never ever ever ever again as long as my rear points downwards play this awesome class that So well implemented.

 

So, end result is I will never get the 260.

 

 



Igor_BL #18 Posted 23 May 2018 - 11:57 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41332 battles
  • 1,480
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015
lets just giveaway obj260 to everyone. why would people even bother playing just to do some stupid missions.,





Also tagged with Bonds, Campaign

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users