Jump to content


K91&Obj277 available on Test Server


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

Penzijon3r_2017 #1 Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:24 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5926 battles
  • 234
  • Member since:
    07-19-2017
Playing now with them two... K91 is ugly as f*ck :D

Sfinski #2 Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:34 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31728 battles
  • 2,638
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

K-91 seems to suck quite a bit, 277 is nice and 268-4 hasn't been nerfed enough, not even close. 

 

Edit// 277s 350mm prem ammo is too much...


Edited by Sfinski, 25 May 2018 - 03:39 PM.


_Sensation_ #3 Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7266 battles
  • 582
  • [TRTD] TRTD
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017
Obj 277 new meta, better than 5A?

Hiisi #4 Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:40 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14993 battles
  • 266
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    03-21-2011

K-91 doesn´t have any strenghts exept fast shell speed and a bit pen. It sucks. Not as much as leopard 1, but its bad.

 

obj-277 seems very strong



Sfinski #5 Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:41 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31728 battles
  • 2,638
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View Post_Sensation_, on 25 May 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

Obj 277 new meta, better than 5A?

 

Like comparing their t9 counterparts. 

Spurtung #6 Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:53 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63763 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

I was about to start a thread on this, so I'll just leave this for anyone wanting to know what they should be grinding:

 



Sfinski #7 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31728 battles
  • 2,638
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Forget K-91, it sucks. To make it work you'd need to make it more like 430 II is now, with armour.

Cobra6 #8 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,770
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Obj.277: It's a new top tier tank from Wargaming so of course it's at least very strong but more preferably overpowered as to be an incentive for the maximum amount of players to convert free-XP to unlock it.

 

Really not surprising or even special anymore.

 

Cobra 6



Hiisi #9 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14993 battles
  • 266
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    03-21-2011

Heavies are faster thand mediums...

 

obj277 is as fast as k-91... 

 

how the hell you should play sniping medium with no armor+back turret (not fully rotating)+5 deg depression.

 

also when you traverse your hull your gun makes back and forth movement...

 

plus the model is afull...


Edited by Hiisi, 25 May 2018 - 04:10 PM.


ares354 #10 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:27 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73803 battles
  • 3,224
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010
Why you would play IS 7, IS 4 over Obj 277 > ? He have same alpha as IS 7 and more pen IS 4.. .balance 

Edited by ares354, 25 May 2018 - 04:27 PM.


_Sensation_ #11 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7266 battles
  • 582
  • [TRTD] TRTD
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

View PostCobra6, on 25 May 2018 - 04:05 PM, said:

Obj.277: It's a new top tier tank from Wargaming so of course it's at least very strong but more preferably overpowered as to be an incentive for the maximum amount of players to convert free-XP to unlock it.

 

Really not surprising or even special anymore.

 

Cobra 6

 

And it will get nerfed 2 months later

Strizi #12 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37017 battles
  • 611
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
Why does 277 have aim time like 5a but accuracy and gun depression better than 113 and probably better armor too and 350 premium pen? [edited]this powercreep crap typical WG [edited]this company never learns from mistakes.

Edited by Strizi, 25 May 2018 - 04:32 PM.


ares354 #13 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:35 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73803 battles
  • 3,224
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View PostStrizi, on 25 May 2018 - 04:32 PM, said:

Why does 277 have aim time like 5a but accuracy and gun depression better than 113 and probably better armor too and 350 premium pen? [edited]this powercreep crap typical WG [edited]this company never learns from mistakes.

 

Because soviet russia had best HT in history, was most powerfull nation in their closed minds. Do you get it ? 

New soviet tank have IS 7 alpha, AMX M4 54 Ap pen, WA 5a rof. He get from all those tanks something usefull. And ofc MT mobility and soft stats

NEW 268 4 coming. 

Sfinski #14 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:42 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31728 battles
  • 2,638
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

Comparison without crew and equipment.



Element6 #15 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29305 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
K91 will be the first I'll get. Feels good to be a weirdo...

leggasiini #16 Posted 25 May 2018 - 04:56 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14273 battles
  • 6,194
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

277 is very comfortable to play, but IMO it has a bit too much armor for the gun and mobility it has. Like, it's among best in class when it comes to mobility (it has higher top speed than 113/5A and reaches it easier than the IS-7), and the gun might as well be the best HT gun in the game. I don't know why it needs hull armor; the T-10 doesn't really have any meaningful hull armor, anyway (unless you're fighting tier 7s and some tier 8s). They should make the hull armor weak enough that it wont bounce tier 10s much at all from front. It would still have the turret armor. The gun is so amazing that the tank would still be good if it had completely useless hull armor, as long as if it still has the mobility and turret armor. I also think that the 350 APCR is kinda silly; just change it to HEAT and you're good to go.

 

K-91 is kinda weak, though


Edited by leggasiini, 25 May 2018 - 05:05 PM.


xx984 #17 Posted 25 May 2018 - 05:08 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55038 battles
  • 2,520
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
just give 277 IS-3/T-10 levels of armour tier for tier would be best thing to do.

Jumping_TurtIe #18 Posted 25 May 2018 - 05:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6246 battles
  • 957
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2015

View PostSpurtung, on 25 May 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

I was about to start a thread on this, so I'll just leave this for anyone wanting to know what they should be grinding:

 

 

251k XP for 91 and 224k XP for 777 is that correct?

Spurtung #19 Posted 25 May 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63763 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostJumping_TurtIe, on 25 May 2018 - 06:10 PM, said:

View PostSpurtung, on 25 May 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

I was about to start a thread on this, so I'll just leave this for anyone wanting to know what they should be grinding:

 

 

251k XP for 91 and 224k XP for 777 is that correct?

Errrr...no?

252.7 for 91 and 220.8 for 7277.


Edited by Spurtung, 25 May 2018 - 05:32 PM.


Jumping_TurtIe #20 Posted 25 May 2018 - 05:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6246 battles
  • 957
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2015

View PostSpurtung, on 25 May 2018 - 05:22 PM, said:

Errrr...no?

252.7 for 91 and 220.8 for 777.

 

Close enough ;)

 

So need 120k for 91 and 60 for 77... Not that bad.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users