Jump to content


Just Another OP Soviet Vehicle(obj 277)


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

engin_warrior_1 #1 Posted 27 May 2018 - 04:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12222 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    03-20-2016
i'm not surprised, wg again puts another *edited* OP soviet vehicle in game. Okay WG all we know you're russian company but what about the other nations ?? ? ? 
What's the point of playing other nations now ? Russian tech tree has almost all powerful tanks with  armor, DPM, speed etc. 
WG should delete all tech trees except Soviet tree i think, that's how all players will have to play only Soviet tech tree like WG wants!!!
sometimes İ really can't understand what WG tries to do. How cant they see that they're losing players because of those unfair behaviors.

Edited by NickMustaine, 28 May 2018 - 11:14 AM.
Inappropriate remarks


ThebaldEagle #2 Posted 27 May 2018 - 04:04 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 760 battles
  • 378
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Who is stopping you from buying that tank yourself ?????

Dava_117 #3 Posted 27 May 2018 - 04:28 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19424 battles
  • 3,285
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postengin_warrior_1, on 27 May 2018 - 04:02 PM, said:

i'm not surprised, wg again puts another *edited* OP soviet vehicle in game. Okay WG all we know you're russian company but what about the other nations ?? ? ? 
What's the point of playing other nations now ? Russian tech tree has almost all powerful tanks with  armor, DPM, speed etc. 
WG should delete all tech trees except Soviet tree i think, that's how all players will have to play only Soviet tech tree like WG wants!!!
sometimes İ really can't understand what WG tries to do. How cant they see that they're losing players because of those unfair behaviors.

 

Have to remember you Type5, SConqueror, the old E5, Maus, VK100.01P and so on?

The problem is not a nation having OP tanks, the problem are OP tanks in general! :facepalm:



engin_warrior_1 #4 Posted 27 May 2018 - 04:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12222 battles
  • 578
  • Member since:
    03-20-2016

View PostThebaldEagle, on 27 May 2018 - 04:04 PM, said:

Who is stopping you from buying that tank yourself ?????

Hmmm...so logical answer....how couldnt think that.....

So you say this is normal, i mean all soviet new comer vehicles are OP and you think it is well.....you have nothing to say about that unfair situation ?

 

View PostDava_117, on 27 May 2018 - 04:28 PM, said:

 

Have to remember you Type5, SConqueror, the old E5, Maus, VK100.01P and so on?

The problem is not a nation having OP tanks, the problem are OP tanks in general! :facepalm:

 

you are right actually, WG never balances the game. Maybe it is intentional i dont know.

But now, most of the OP vehicles are soviet like they used to be. There are always OP soviets in the game, thats what im angry.


 

Edited by NickMustaine, 28 May 2018 - 11:15 AM.


hasnainrakha57 #5 Posted 27 May 2018 - 04:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13832 battles
  • 583
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
Yup!

Dava_117 #6 Posted 27 May 2018 - 04:56 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19424 battles
  • 3,285
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View Postengin_warrior_1, on 27 May 2018 - 04:43 PM, said:

 

you are right actually, WG never balances the game. Maybe it is intentional i dont know.

But now, most of the OP vehicles are soviet like they used to be. There are always OP soviets in the game, thats what im angry.

 

Now, this may be a bit cynical, but I think that in the last years this OP tanks introduction has became intentional. People free exp to quickly get to them, spending money on the game.

The fact that the most recent are soviet, it's probably because it's the tech tree they're working on atm. At least this is my opinion.

 

But, as I said, this does not justify them for introducing more OP tanks in other tech tree. Instead they should nerf the abominions while are just few...



etody77 #7 Posted 27 May 2018 - 05:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 62862 battles
  • 945
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
it_s still test server, i remember that another obj. was nerfed after first test

hasnainrakha57 #8 Posted 27 May 2018 - 05:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13832 battles
  • 583
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View Postetody77, on 27 May 2018 - 04:00 PM, said:

it_s still test server, i remember that another obj. was nerfed after first test

obj 268v4 was also in test server but they put in game so ppl free xp now they nerfed it coz they earned enough money from it!



etody77 #9 Posted 27 May 2018 - 05:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 62862 battles
  • 945
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

yes, i know, but before that was 1 a little nerfed

they will nerf this because russia has already a good tier 10 HT-IS7

bobject....russians want to have best tanks on tier 10, and they sucked at Td class



Balc0ra #10 Posted 27 May 2018 - 05:31 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66256 battles
  • 16,243
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

You are saying it's OP because others say so. Or because you have tested it yourself? As like even the T29. It's strong hull down, or on a ridge line. In the open, like the T-10 it gets auto penned by most tier X guns, or even tier 9 HT guns. It's strong and tough to counter if he has a strong position. Like most tanks in the game. But in the open or if you force him out, he is not hard to counter.

 

But on CT 90% of the targets you face is the the K-91 or the 277, or FV4005. It's not easy to get a good feel for what it actually is tbh. As ppl said the same thing about the Foch B. As we saw 5 topics a day about while CT was up... 2 days after it appeared on live, no one said a thing about it. As it only did seem OP on CT, facing the same 4 targets everyone was testing.


Edited by Balc0ra, 27 May 2018 - 05:32 PM.


AXIS_OF_RESISTANCE #11 Posted 28 May 2018 - 12:10 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 273 battles
  • 198
  • Member since:
    12-21-2017

Is every one deliberately forgetting the op af WZ-5A it has better aim time and dpm ,same speed, honestly like halllo are you even playing the game ????


Edited by AXIS_OF_RESISTANCE, 28 May 2018 - 12:11 AM.


PauI #12 Posted 28 May 2018 - 05:11 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25608 battles
  • 396
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011

View Postengin_warrior_1, on 27 May 2018 - 03:02 PM, said:

i'm not surprised, wg again puts another *edited* OP soviet vehicle in game. Okay WG all we know you're russian company but what about the other nations ?? ? ? 
What's the point of playing other nations now ? Russian tech tree has almost all powerful tanks with  armor, DPM, speed etc. 
WG should delete all tech trees except Soviet tree i think, that's how all players will have to play only Soviet tech tree like WG wants!!!
sometimes İ really can't understand what WG tries to do. How cant they see that they're losing players because of those unfair behaviors.

It is enough to play clan battles and you will see 2/3 of thw tanks being rasha.

Regarding your ideea to delete everything except rasha....i have a better one...put rasha on a server by itslef, there you can create more nations....staliinskaya....leninskaya...putinskaya....



TankkiPoju #13 Posted 28 May 2018 - 10:26 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20308 battles
  • 6,196
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
Doesn't seem OP to me, but a logical successor to T-10.

zero_fox_given #14 Posted 28 May 2018 - 10:36 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3752 battles
  • 99
  • Member since:
    03-23-2018

View PostThebaldEagle, on 27 May 2018 - 04:04 PM, said:

Who is stopping you from buying that tank yourself ?????

this is exact mentality of opportunistic pussy and there is lot of these also on this forum

 

not balanced game, just buy it is it is OP and use it to kill others....... fair-play?



Warzey #15 Posted 28 May 2018 - 11:16 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57073 battles
  • 949
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Postengin_warrior_1, on 27 May 2018 - 03:02 PM, said:

i'm not surprised, wg again puts another *edited* OP soviet vehicle in game. Okay WG all we know you're russian company but what about the other nations ?? ? ? 
What's the point of playing other nations now ? Russian tech tree has almost all powerful tanks with  armor, DPM, speed etc. 
WG should delete all tech trees except Soviet tree i think, that's how all players will have to play only Soviet tech tree like WG wants!!!
sometimes İ really can't understand what WG tries to do. How cant they see that they're losing players because of those unfair behaviors.

 

Why do you think that Obj 277 is so much better than WZ-111 5A?

NoobySkooby #16 Posted 28 May 2018 - 11:19 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 12969 battles
  • 2,770
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011
Are there any Brit OP tanks, or is that justa joke?

Comrade_Renamon #17 Posted 28 May 2018 - 11:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9835 battles
  • 859
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View PostAXIS_OF_RESISTANCE, on 27 May 2018 - 11:10 PM, said:

Is every one deliberately forgetting the op af WZ-5A it has better aim time and dpm ,same speed, honestly like halllo are you even playing the game ????

 

Better DPM yes (0,29 sec faster reload), the Obj 277 has better gun handling (same aim time, better bloom stats, better accuracy).

WZ has the advantage in mobility and positioning due to the 7 degree gun depression, Obj 277 has the better gun handling, speed and better armour profile. Both tanks outshine other tanks in that department (113)



ares354 #18 Posted 28 May 2018 - 01:52 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73803 battles
  • 3,222
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View Postetody77, on 27 May 2018 - 05:00 PM, said:

it_s still test server, i remember that another obj. was nerfed after first test

 

Was 268 4 nered in his test server ? 
 

View PostWarzey, on 28 May 2018 - 11:16 AM, said:

 

Why do you think that Obj 277 is so much better than WZ-111 5A?

 

Gun handling for 490 alpha say all. AND sick premium ammo and AP that crapon all 120 mm guns. 
 

BlackKnight095 #19 Posted 01 June 2018 - 06:36 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11518 battles
  • 48
  • [D1SCO] D1SCO
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013
Please stop it, T-10 has penetration 340mm with gold and nobody tells anything aboht it, Obj. 277 is better for 10mm, and it is logical because it is higher tier. T-10 is fast vehicle so obj has to be slightly faster, and obj 277 has pretty bad armor.

Tinbawx #20 Posted 01 June 2018 - 06:50 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14747 battles
  • 1,251
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View PostBlackKnight095, on 01 June 2018 - 06:36 AM, said:

Please stop it, T-10 has penetration 340mm with gold and nobody tells anything aboht it, Obj. 277 is better for 10mm, and it is logical because it is higher tier. T-10 is fast vehicle so obj has to be slightly faster, and obj 277 has pretty bad armor.

 

340mm HEAT pen is fairly standard. Lots of T9 and 10 tanks accross multiple nations (USSR, USA, China) have it.

350 APCR pen on non TDs on the other hand is unheard of. Pushing the envelope with premium ammo is bad, mkay.

 

Putting the highest pen of all HTs (VK 72.01 K has same but on a slow a f HEAT round) on the fastest shell in the game and slapping that on your newest blyat mobile is not "logical", it´s power creep.


Edited by Tinbawx, 01 June 2018 - 07:05 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users