Jump to content


OBJ 726 incoming (Supertest) "4 tracks and OBJ 907 side armor"


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

ValkyrionX #1 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 46411 battles
  • 1,182
  • [5FPS] 5FPS
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

 

 

Personal Missions 2.0 tier X reward tank??? Or another broken tank in ussr tech tree?

 

TANK PICTURES

 

 

chica blyat

 


Edited by ValkyrionX, 30 May 2018 - 04:13 PM.


Sfinski #2 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:15 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32283 battles
  • 2,754
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

Doesn't look at all broken. /s

 

Like they could ever balance that properly...



Suurpolskija #3 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18698 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016
Sup with the premium shells and aim time & accuracy with these new rasha thingses? First 277 and now this.

SovietBias #4 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37407 battles
  • 1,336
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013
Come Here Little Fellas 

PrinzPilsje #5 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:31 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 68883 battles
  • 287
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011
Bot-gaming

Balc0ra #6 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:33 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67404 battles
  • 17,133
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostSuurpolskija, on 30 May 2018 - 04:17 PM, said:

Sup with the premium shells and aim time & accuracy with these new rasha thingses? First 277 and now this.

 

Considering the buffs the CW tanks got. I suspect 340 to 350 will be the new tier X "meta". Tho 277 had a bit to much since it was APCR and not HEAT, along with an insane shell speed. 

 

View PostValkyrionX, on 30 May 2018 - 04:05 PM, said:

Personal Missions 2.0 tier X reward tank??? Or another broken tank in ussr tech tree?

 

Not unlikely considering there even is a tier 5 prem in testing atm. And a new set of PM was promised to come later this year. 



vasilinhorulezz #7 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
200mm frontal armor with this kind of angling probably shouts "HEAT-magnet", but the side armor with 150mm thickness would be quite trollish.

suvicze #8 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 19297 battles
  • 662
  • [CS-TB] CS-TB
  • Member since:
    08-07-2010

Premium shells are fine. It is the same as other M62 122mm guns on high tier russian heavies like is-4, T-10 etc. It is just that premium ammo on tanks like IS7 suck and should be buffed as it is simply lacking in the current state of the game. It was fine 3-4 years ago but these days it is simply not enough against some enemies especially with bad acc and aim time.

What seems more problematic to me are the other gun stats. 2s aim time is better or similar to majority of medium tanks with 105mm and less caliber guns...It also has around 2700dpm and if the info is to be believed its soft stats will be really good as well. Why not give is7 extra shot per minute, bring the aim time down to 2,3 and increase the apcr pen to 320+. With how these new russian heavies look it would be perfectly ok...

Also "Actually, the gun on this tank is so good, we can’t wait to nerf it!" yeah right...as long as russian noob supertester will like it it wont be nerfed until few months after official release at best like with 268v4 and it will not be nearly enough.



AllTheChildren #9 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:50 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 36367 battles
  • 169
  • [MOBS] MOBS
  • Member since:
    07-09-2014

View PostSfinski, on 30 May 2018 - 03:15 PM, said:

Doesn't look at all broken. /s

 

Like they could ever balance that properly...

 

Just that the tracks in the middle protect the whole lower plate against heat.

Will also probably provide some additional cover against normal shells.

 

But they also said that they already know that it needs some nerfs.



peekakilla #10 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:52 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11501 battles
  • 395
  • Member since:
    05-16-2016

View PostAllTheChildren, on 30 May 2018 - 04:50 PM, said:

 

Just that the tracks in the middle protect the whole lower plate against heat.

Will also probably provide some additional cover against normal shells.

 

But they also said that they already know that it needs some nerfs.

 

a nerf? this thing need and exorcist :ohmy:

_Sensation_ #11 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7849 battles
  • 598
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

Omg who would've thought :ohmy:

 

It's russian :trollface:



Dr_Oolen #12 Posted 30 May 2018 - 04:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22345 battles
  • 1,639
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012
A russian heavy tank? Finally!

panzer_war #13 Posted 30 May 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6724 battles
  • 43
  • [-NIB-] -NIB-
  • Member since:
    06-24-2011

this needs a meme


Edited by panzer_war, 30 May 2018 - 05:03 PM.


panzer_war #14 Posted 30 May 2018 - 05:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6724 battles
  • 43
  • [-NIB-] -NIB-
  • Member since:
    06-24-2011
Needed

Attached Files

  • Attached File   negrone.jpg   52.66K

Edited by panzer_war, 30 May 2018 - 05:03 PM.


Ziurawka #15 Posted 30 May 2018 - 05:18 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22387 battles
  • 443
  • [NLUFA] NLUFA
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015

And someone still wonders why people still prefer to play PMM tanks even with their current stats?

I'd prefer to play IS-6 to any tier VIII that will have to see this. 



ares354 #16 Posted 30 May 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73975 battles
  • 3,294
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View PostZiurawka, on 30 May 2018 - 05:18 PM, said:

And someone still wonders why people still prefer to play PMM tanks even with their current stats?

I'd prefer to play IS-6 to any tier VIII that will have to see this. 

 

Yes, because when you see Type 4 with IS 6 on Paris you life will be better at that point in time. 

Tinbawx #17 Posted 30 May 2018 - 05:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14747 battles
  • 1,252
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011
The question is, can you track it and deal damage at same time, from the front, or does it simply have no lfp?

Ziurawka #18 Posted 30 May 2018 - 06:01 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22387 battles
  • 443
  • [NLUFA] NLUFA
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015

View Postares354, on 30 May 2018 - 05:22 PM, said:

 

Yes, because when you see Type 4 with IS 6 on Paris you life will be better at that point in time. 

 

Yes sure Type 4 is kinda broken, but just how many tanks like it are impenetrable from the front at tier IX?

And it's also a bad example cause it doesn't really move.

Nothing they released so far comes close to this, just look at this monstrosity :D



ares354 #19 Posted 30 May 2018 - 06:07 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73975 battles
  • 3,294
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View PostZiurawka, on 30 May 2018 - 06:01 PM, said:

 

Yes sure Type 4 is kinda broken, but just how many tanks like it are impenetrable from the front at tier IX?

And it's also a bad example cause it doesn't really move.

Nothing they released so far comes close to this, just look at this monstrosity :D

 

For IS 6 > ? Vk auf B, ST 1, a few more. 

Beltalowda #20 Posted 30 May 2018 - 06:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 63492 battles
  • 882
  • Member since:
    03-02-2011
Wallet closed since December, ain't gonna open it again anytime soon.

Keep your OP Soviet tonks, I am not interested WG.

Almost everyone on my friend list have stopped playing WoT for various reasons, but the main reason is You introducing one OP shajt after the other. Deliberately ruining the game experience for everyone who has supported you since the very beginning.

Soon it will be my tine to go, I guess I should thank you for that.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users