Jump to content


So who is delusional

game is free to play

  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

Cuck0osNest #1 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7430 battles
  • 803
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

You firing gold at tanks. Players of those tanks are not expecting to be attacked by expensive rounds, whats why they brawl to participate in something. You use WN8 and damage done as a thing after that. You are delusional unless you call it "pay-to-wn8", not just "wn8" as a skill evaluation thing.

 

Just because you found a game where developers sell victories for additional credits, you continue buying victories in it and thinking what you know something about competitive gaming- that's why you are delusional and will be until every player in WOT will be in equal conditions. You are delusional unless you aren't naming things by proper names like "buying victories", "paying for things". You don't even understand how you are delusional, it is a lot more to explain. You are not using RR as a skill evaluation either, you are delusional about any its metrics in game. 

 

Yes, there is an association of those who crapon ppl for additional credits, there are always place for them, no one but those who want to make the game better is against it. Just remember, no one who has a healthy idea about fair play will care about that, those really competitive players with crystal clear vision and those who consciously pay for results will call things by their proper names. 


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM.


evilchaosmonkey #2 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16630 battles
  • 1,752
  • [EIGHT] EIGHT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

It's a tank game.

It is not real life and truly it does not matter if people pay to win or not.



Homer_J #3 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:19 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
Cuck, you have a 58% win rate and talk about game being pay to win.  I guess you paid a lot then.

Jethro_Grey #4 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4284 battles
  • 534
  • [KAIN] KAIN
  • Member since:
    08-01-2015

WG is selling victories for additional credits?? 

When did that happen? 

 

 

Oh wait, you mean they are selling shells for additional credits so people can contest overpowered and broken tanks from the front, which in the corridor maps is a necessity. 

 

So, you got raped by someone using premium silver rounds and now you whine? Pls take your meds, your post sounds like some delusional guy posted nonsense. :trollface:



Cuck0osNest #5 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:24 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7430 battles
  • 803
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View Postevilchaosmonkey, on 03 June 2018 - 03:14 PM, said:

It's a tank game.

It is not real life and truly it does not matter if people pay to win or not.

So here is why you play with premium. So it matters somehow...

View PostHomer_J, on 03 June 2018 - 03:19 PM, said:

Cuck, you have a 58% win rate and talk about game being pay to win.  I guess you paid a lot then.

With 600 avg exp you call it paying? Or you still think WG is not selling average experience to ingame statistics? Probably you just dont know...noone judges you for not knowing things, i am here to share not to judge.


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 03 June 2018 - 03:26 PM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #6 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:26 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27589 battles
  • 1,980
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
Out of interest what's the going rate for a 58% win rate then?

Cuck0osNest #7 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7430 battles
  • 803
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 03 June 2018 - 03:26 PM, said:

Out of interest what's the going rate for a 58% win rate then?

 

Winrate is not the only thing.

unhappy_bunny #8 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:30 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17926 battles
  • 2,470
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

Guys, you are missing the point.

 

Everyone still talks about W/R and WN8. No one is using Cuckoo's beloved RR. Drop your current favorite stats system and embrace the Cuckoo. 



Dava_117 #9 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18578 battles
  • 2,764
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

I play mostly HTs. I learned a long time ago to expect gold to be fired at me. I learned to angle to bounce gold and to evaluate distance between covers vs damage I can get to reach the next one. HP is a resource that should be used to gain advantage, so I don't care if I got hit by a couple of gold round to reach a position where I can bounce the next 10 premium shell incoming.

Anyone driving an HT or another well armoured tank not expecting gold or to lose some HP in the open, should really learn to use those tanks, IMO. 

Allways expect the worst case!



Homer_J #10 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:33 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostCuck0osNest, on 03 June 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

 

With 600 avg exp you call it paying? 

You are winning way more than average.  I just want to know how much more I need to pay because so far it's not working for me.

View PostCuck0osNest, on 03 June 2018 - 03:29 PM, said:

 

Winrate is not the only thing.

But if I'm paying to win then I expect to win.



NUKLEAR_SLUG #11 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27589 battles
  • 1,980
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View PostCuck0osNest, on 03 June 2018 - 03:29 PM, said:

 

Winrate is not the only thing.

 

It's not, but if the server average is approx. 48%WR and you are "buying victoryes" I'm just wondering how much you personally paid for your extra 10%WR over the server average?

 

So how much was it?


Edited by NUKLEAR_SLUG, 03 June 2018 - 03:35 PM.


Cuck0osNest #12 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7430 battles
  • 803
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostDava_117, on 03 June 2018 - 03:32 PM, said:

Allways expect the worst case!

"And never try to find ways of making WOT better game"

View PostHomer_J, on 03 June 2018 - 03:33 PM, said:

You are winning way more than average.  I just want to know how much more I need to pay because so far it's not working for me.

But if I'm paying to win then I expect to win.

You cant buy efforts and game knowledge, sorry. But you can buy comforts, thats why your WR is a bit higher additionally.


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 03 June 2018 - 03:40 PM.


sgtYester #13 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:39 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53470 battles
  • 1,521
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

View Postevilchaosmonkey, on 03 June 2018 - 03:14 PM, said:

It's a tank game.

It is not real life and truly it does not matter if people pay to win or not.

 

does not matter if ppl p2w......  ehh.......:facepalm::facepalm::amazed:

Aikl #14 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 03 June 2018 - 02:07 PM, said:

(...) You are delusional (...)

 

 

Arguably relevant:

 

 

 



NUKLEAR_SLUG #15 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:47 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27589 battles
  • 1,980
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View PostCuck0osNest, on 03 June 2018 - 03:36 PM, said:

You cant buy efforts and game knowledge, sorry. But you can buy comforts, thats why your WR is a bit higher additionally.

 

Ah, so you got your 58% WR by buying comforts? How many did you need to buy and how much did you have to pay for them? I'm only on 55% see so I'm just wondering how much extra I'd need to spend.

Cuck0osNest #16 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7430 battles
  • 803
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 03 June 2018 - 03:47 PM, said:

 

How many did you need to buy and how much did you have to pay for them?

As much as you think WG deserves

View PostAikl, on 03 June 2018 - 03:46 PM, said:

Arguably relevant:

 

You RR  is now 2 times lower than your beloved's Bumbar, are you glad now? Yes, it becomes more perfect.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 03 June 2018 - 04:01 PM.


ThinGun #17 Posted 03 June 2018 - 03:54 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34088 battles
  • 1,076
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014
I want a link to this pay-to-win portal.  Mum's credit card is begging to be used ....

Aikl #18 Posted 03 June 2018 - 04:06 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 03 June 2018 - 02:52 PM, said:

(...)

You RR  is now 2 times lower than your beloved Bumbar's, are you glad now? Yes, it becomes more perfect.

 

At least your memory's decent. It's been, what, about two months since I, rightfully, made fun of your RR®™ for that very reason. I'm happy for you - and I'd be beyond happy if I actually cared about statistics.

 

As mentioned before, I still think there's some merit to RR®™.

Too bad RR®™ as we know it comes bundled with a truckload of exclusively bovine-sourced organic fertilizer. Better known as [edited] .


Edited by Aikl, 03 June 2018 - 04:06 PM.


Cuck0osNest #19 Posted 03 June 2018 - 04:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7430 battles
  • 803
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostAikl, on 03 June 2018 - 04:06 PM, said:

 

Too bad RR®™ as we know it comes bundled with a truckload of exclusively bovine-sourced organic fertilizer. Better known as [edited] .

 

Whats why you will never have friends, only delusional  [edited] on your side.

Edited by Cuck0osNest, 03 June 2018 - 04:14 PM.


mpf1959 #20 Posted 03 June 2018 - 04:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13618 battles
  • 634
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-29-2017

So who is delusional

 

Me, and so's my wife!  :B






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users