Jump to content


Arms Race Campaign is a total failure (complaint & anger)


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

ValkyrionX #1 Posted 03 June 2018 - 11:59 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44706 battles
  • 1,061
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

not even the type 5 or the maus overbuffed were so ridiculous, not even the t110e3 or the badger are so hard... you have to stop inserting tanks since most likely you (devs) do not even play Wot on live servers but only in your stupid closed beta.
Playing this campaign and seeing an average of 6 or more obj268-4 per team has frankly brought this game to exasperation and to the monotony of seeing only camper teams or violent attacks by these totally nonsense tanks, it does not take a genius or be a developer to understand that you have failed yet again to make your Russian playerbase happy..here we are in Europe and we do not break the brain of vodka and we do not smoke car tires for fun, if you like to add these retarded tanks add them only on the server of russian drunkards, here we want a game that is different, varied and balanced and enjoyable


Your balancing department has failed all the way because the marketing has clearly won, the maps, some tanks in the game, the nosense "gold" spam and those (tanks*) in the current closed beta, you have made this game foolproof and do nothing that can really innovate the game ..
the only good thing that in recent years, we talk about years, you have done .. was the frontline mode .. for the rest only trash ..


*and to add more crap to this game why not insert other stupid rusky tanks that are obviously too strong for this game?  who cares, no? we are wargaming ,blyat !

 

 

 

 

 

for readers

 

 

 


Edited by ValkyrionX, 04 June 2018 - 12:21 AM.


majogl #2 Posted 04 June 2018 - 01:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22959 battles
  • 1,376
  • Member since:
    09-26-2011

Knowing WG, this will be their response...

 

<russianAccent>

"Da, comrade, right you are my friend. We hear you and understand you. Our community is very important to us. The UFO tanks are not balanced across the nations, so we will start adding UFO tanks for other nations... How would you like the USA's Chrysler TV-8 to be a brand new premium T9 amphibious Medium Tank, for the low price of 20.000 gold?"

</russianAccent>


Edited by majogl, 04 June 2018 - 01:27 AM.


etody77 #3 Posted 04 June 2018 - 01:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 62862 battles
  • 945
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

View Postmajogl, on 04 June 2018 - 01:25 AM, said:

 How would you like the USA's Chrysler TV-8 to be a brand new premium T9 amphibious Medium Tank, for the low price of 20.000 gold?"

</russianAccent>

yes...I want to see one of this exploding in the middle of his team  (nuclear propulsion tank)



Sfinski #4 Posted 04 June 2018 - 05:07 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31689 battles
  • 2,610
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
That 279 isn't coming to the game luckily. 

Radu_Korne #5 Posted 04 June 2018 - 05:59 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27982 battles
  • 1,412
  • [WEBAN] WEBAN
  • Member since:
    08-16-2013

Arms Race = hordes of 268 v4s relentlessly trying to pen each other with HEAT... wow, the skill involved. I played one night, still on position 10500 after 4 days now? So much interest!



ValkyrionX #6 Posted 04 June 2018 - 09:22 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44706 battles
  • 1,061
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View PostSfinski, on 04 June 2018 - 05:07 AM, said:

That 279 isn't coming to the game luckily. 

 

i will not so sure about that...on the forums there are fragmentary news of personal missions 2.0, I believe that after the summer we will see these new set of missions in the game, and the relative prize tanks, and I believe that at least one of these Russian tier X will be included as a prize ... making the poor and underestimated obj260 obsolete...:sceptic:

 

View PostRadu_Korne, on 04 June 2018 - 05:59 AM, said:

Arms Race = hordes of 268 v4s relentlessly trying to pen each other with HEAT... wow, the skill involved. I played one night, still on position 10500 after 4 days now? So much interest!

 

im in the first 2k players, but  this is not the question..the problem here is the infestation of bobjekt268 v4 in every team..the game experience its really horrible imo

the heavy tanks can not compete in terms of armor with this ridiculous tank, it also has more dpm than an is7 (and the apcr of the is7 are not enough to always penetrate it frontally)
this game is becoming ridiculous , often the heat ammunition of wz 5a, 113 or obj260 do not go to the frontal weakspots that are really small and very hard and shoot in frontal on the move during a rush is very difficult in some maps/situations.. Imagine new players or people playing for the first time a campaign on the global map ... obvious that it would lose interest ...

also the type 5 and the maus have become useless, the same is true for badger, t110e3 and jpe100

this tank have monopolized the advances, the tier X skirmishes ,every single clan war/global map battle and tier X tournaments

I really like Russian tanks in general, but this obj268-4 is too much for this game ..

 

 

#howdisgusting

 

 

 

 

Edited by ValkyrionX, 04 June 2018 - 09:35 AM.


Cannes76 #7 Posted 04 June 2018 - 10:00 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 66479 battles
  • 1,721
  • [ORIGN] ORIGN
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
The russian players are complaining as much about the bobject as everyone else.

Homer_J #8 Posted 04 June 2018 - 10:06 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,991
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostSfinski, on 04 June 2018 - 05:07 AM, said:

That 279 isn't coming to the game luckily. 

 

You would have to be very naive to believe that.

 

Maybe someone would like to start a list of tanks which were never coming to the game?

 

WZ-111-5 for instance.

The whole Chinese TD line which were CN exclusive.



ValkyrionX #9 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:16 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44706 battles
  • 1,061
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View PostCannes76, on 04 June 2018 - 10:00 AM, said:

The russian players are complaining as much about the bobject as everyone else.

 

thx for the info

KillingJoker #10 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:57 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33316 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

In my opinion the best option to counter the 268 v4 is by using deadstars, i understand that most you must obey your field commander, but still...

 

i have seen it, deadstars are quite effective taking down 268 v4s, they can overmatch the armor on the hull top or in the top of hte tank wich is also angled towards front and that its more or less like just pen the top of the roof and they simply evaporate...

 



Cobra6 #11 Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:00 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,760
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

These tanks will come to the game, it's a sliding scale with Wargaming and it always was. I still remember them claiming the new German heavy line would not come (VK.100.01P etc.) because it was bad for the game......a year later they introduced them.

 

Tanks like the Defender would have never been released 5 years ago because they are broken, but nowadays they get implemented because they bring in money and who cares about proper balancing anymore anyway a part from players who remember better times.

Despite it's flaws WoT was a much better balanced game 5 years ago then it is now.

 

Cobra 6



NoobySkooby #12 Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:39 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 12964 battles
  • 2,758
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostValkyrionX, on 03 June 2018 - 11:59 PM, said:

not even the type 5 or the maus overbuffed were so ridiculous, not even the t110e3 or the badger are so hard... you have to stop inserting tanks since most likely you (devs) do not even play Wot on live servers but only in your stupid closed beta.
Playing this campaign and seeing an average of 6 or more obj268-4 per team has frankly brought this game to exasperation and to the monotony of seeing only camper teams or violent attacks by these totally nonsense tanks, it does not take a genius or be a developer to understand that you have failed yet again to make your Russian playerbase happy..here we are in Europe and we do not break the brain of vodka and we do not smoke car tires for fun, if you like to add these retarded tanks add them only on the server of russian drunkards, here we want a game that is different, varied and balanced and enjoyable


Your balancing department has failed all the way because the marketing has clearly won, the maps, some tanks in the game, the nosense "gold" spam and those (tanks*) in the current closed beta, you have made this game foolproof and do nothing that can really innovate the game ..
the only good thing that in recent years, we talk about years, you have done .. was the frontline mode .. for the rest only trash ..


*and to add more crap to this game why not insert other stupid rusky tanks that are obviously too strong for this game?  who cares, no? we are wargaming ,blyat !

 

 

 

 

 

for readers

 

 

 

 

I liked that just for the dumb music, lol

suvicze #13 Posted 05 June 2018 - 03:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 19297 battles
  • 662
  • [CS-TB] CS-TB
  • Member since:
    08-07-2010

I wonder who designed that obj 279 lol :D Pretty much its only downside is low gun depression...That armor is pretty much impenetrable from the front and side considering the shape, hell even from the back you will probably be bouncing a lot. 130mm gun with medium tank level of dpm and accuracy and with aim time so low pretty much every medium tank can only stare with envy. To top it off, standard round with more penetration than is7 apcr...This tank is the most OP bs even at this time with all the crap in the game like type5, maus, and obj268v4 and apparently it was made quite some time ago. I would also not be surprised if the two thingies holding tracks werent really part of the dmg model so the only thing that would happen when you shoot it would be 0 dmg crit :D

Well not that surprising that they created a monstrosity like this if they planned stuff like T-72...



ValkyrionX #14 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44706 battles
  • 1,061
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015


fryster_12 #15 Posted 07 June 2018 - 12:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43044 battles
  • 821
  • [U-L] U-L
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012
Operation Gambit clearly was better

deivio82 #16 Posted 07 June 2018 - 01:47 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 48124 battles
  • 146
  • [LDTO] LDTO
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012
CW rewards geting same players same clans every year !  congratz to them ... 

Sfinski #17 Posted 07 June 2018 - 03:36 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31689 battles
  • 2,610
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View Postdeivio82, on 07 June 2018 - 02:47 PM, said:

CW rewards geting same players same clans every year !  congratz to them ... 

 

So instead of rewarding the best, what would be your suggestion?

OIias_of_Sunhillow #18 Posted 07 June 2018 - 03:40 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 24521 battles
  • 2,543
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011
I'm not listening to anyone with bumfluff on their chin and an ALF picture on the wall.

HeidenSieker #19 Posted 07 June 2018 - 08:39 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 10046 battles
  • 4,650
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

"Arms Race - share your thoughts!"

 

http://forum.worldof...1#entry15840491

 

Pile in....


Edited by HeidenSieker, 07 June 2018 - 08:39 PM.


Bordhaw #20 Posted 07 June 2018 - 09:21 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11536 battles
  • 2,464
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostValkyrionX, on 03 June 2018 - 10:59 PM, said:

not even the type 5 or the maus overbuffed were so ridiculous, not even the t110e3 or the badger are so hard... you have to stop inserting tanks since most likely you (devs) do not even play Wot on live servers but only in your stupid closed beta.
Playing this campaign and seeing an average of 6 or more obj268-4 per team has frankly brought this game to exasperation and to the monotony of seeing only camper teams or violent attacks by these totally nonsense tanks, it does not take a genius or be a developer to understand that you have failed yet again to make your Russian playerbase happy..here we are in Europe and we do not break the brain of vodka and we do not smoke car tires for fun, if you like to add these retarded tanks add them only on the server of russian drunkards, here we want a game that is different, varied and balanced and enjoyable


Your balancing department has failed all the way because the marketing has clearly won, the maps, some tanks in the game, the nosense "gold" spam and those (tanks*) in the current closed beta, you have made this game foolproof and do nothing that can really innovate the game ..
the only good thing that in recent years, we talk about years, you have done .. was the frontline mode .. for the rest only trash ..


*and to add more crap to this game why not insert other stupid rusky tanks that are obviously too strong for this game?  who cares, no? we are wargaming ,blyat !

 

 

 

 

for readers

 

 

 

You have reached your quota of positive votes for the day




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users