Jump to content


how? deliberate team sabotage?


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

_Anarchistic_ #1 Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:09 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38502 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015
is this  just a general indication of how bad WOT is getting or is this a player deliberately sabotaging his teams as I can imagine being an afk bot every game would have a better WR%

Attached Files

  • Attached File   Screenshot (7)_LI.jpg   242.16K

Edited by _Anarchistic_, 05 June 2018 - 09:30 AM.


TungstenHitman #2 Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:10 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22112 battles
  • 4,044
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016
Stop showing my stats please, I have feelings too!

PervyPastryPuffer #3 Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:14 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31004 battles
  • 1,829
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013
Even having an incredibly low winrate requires skill...

Balc0ra #4 Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:17 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66256 battles
  • 16,239
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
616 average damage with that WR? I suspect he simply only plays tiers past his skill level. As in high tiers. Nothing to see here. 

_Anarchistic_ #5 Posted 05 June 2018 - 12:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38502 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

View PostBalc0ra, on 05 June 2018 - 12:17 AM, said:

616 average damage with that WR? I suspect he simply only plays tiers past his skill level. As in high tiers. Nothing to see here. 

 

I get where you are coming from but, whilst I have seen plenty of low 40% plyers I have never seen below 40% wr with anyone over a few thousand games

 

anyone seen lower with this many games?



Wheelofsun #6 Posted 05 June 2018 - 05:58 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24450 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012
Check out legendary finntrolls SaunaSeppo and KylpyKalle.

Enforcer1975 #7 Posted 05 June 2018 - 07:20 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,857
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
No. He hits too many shots for that.

PowJay #8 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:32 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 35446 battles
  • 4,192
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012
It is probably a case of playing too many tier X (or IX). When you are top tier all the time and are totally inept, then I have seen individual tank win rates as low as 36%

NoobySkooby #9 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:38 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 12964 battles
  • 2,770
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View Post_Anarchistic_, on 05 June 2018 - 12:09 AM, said:

is this  just a general indication of how bad WOT is getting or is this a player deliberately sabotaging his teams as I can imagine how being an afk bot every game would have a lower WR%

 

Seriously, I get called out about my abysmally poor stats in game, yet this guy is even worse, and with a tier 9 tank. When see hit points like that I automatically think aimbot, apparently they are a bad thing to have, maybe I need one, lol.

 

Mine are on th a small increase hugely helped by some helpful advice from some very  nice non judgemental people, although with this guys stats, I will not feel more confident in taking my tier nines out now, and in fact why should I, I ground them up so I will damn well play them.



Jigabachi #10 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:39 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,017
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
As the others said, check his stats. The general ones don't provide too much information.
You can also check wotreplays.com for some replays that he happens to be in.

And yes, there are many players that play worse than bots. Get used to it.

Slyspy #11 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:40 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14202 battles
  • 16,687
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011
High accuracy but low damage suggests HE spam. 

NoobySkooby #12 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:43 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 12964 battles
  • 2,770
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostSlyspy, on 05 June 2018 - 08:40 AM, said:

High accuracy but low damage suggests HE spam. 

 

Is HE spam any worse than premium ammo spam?

Edited by NoobySkooby, 05 June 2018 - 08:44 AM.


Solstad1069 #13 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:47 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 41019 battles
  • 3,208
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013

View PostNoobySkooby, on 05 June 2018 - 08:38 AM, said:

 

Seriously, I get called out about my abysmally poor stats in game, yet this guy is even worse, and with a tier 9 tank. When see hit points like that I automatically think aimbot, apparently they are a bad thing to have, maybe I need one, lol.

 

Mine are on th a small increase hugely helped by some helpful advice from some very  nice non judgemental people, although with this guys stats, I will not feel more confident in taking my tier nines out now, and in fact why should I, I ground them up so I will damn well play them.

 

If you just rest your premium tanks and start grinding from tier 1 you will be over 50% winrate before 15K battles.
 

View PostNoobySkooby, on 05 June 2018 - 08:43 AM, said:

 

Is HE spam any worse than premium ammo spam?

 

If you want to win, yes.
 

NoobySkooby #14 Posted 05 June 2018 - 08:58 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 12964 battles
  • 2,770
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostSolstad1069, on 05 June 2018 - 08:47 AM, said:

 

If you just rest your premium tanks and start grinding from tier 1 you will be over 50% winrate before 15K battles.

 

Well I ground up the russian heavy line all the way to tier 10 so how dos that sound?

 

Thinking I will take my Comets and KV13's out today, no dastardly premiums, just use my elite tanks instead:trollface:

 

 

 

 



Merton15 #15 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:19 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13859 battles
  • 464
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

I want to see a replay of the game they got Top Gun. What must the other players have been like?



jabster #16 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:25 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12537 battles
  • 23,384
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010
I think the worst stats I’ve seen were about 41% which could probably be accounted for by the way the played and also that they were platooned with a player that had only marginally better stats. Carry on doing that and the only way is down.

KillingJoker #17 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:33 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33316 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015
if you dont hide the name of the player in the image, you will get warning points for violating the forum rules... just saying

Nethraniel #18 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:35 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13193 battles
  • 2,010
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostKillingJoker, on 05 June 2018 - 09:33 AM, said:

if you dont hide the name of the player in the image, you will get warning points for violating the forum rules... just saying

 

He did. He does not need to hide his own account name, only the name of the guy with the horrible WR.

KillingJoker #19 Posted 05 June 2018 - 09:42 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33316 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

View PostNethraniel, on 05 June 2018 - 09:35 AM, said:

 

He did. He does not need to hide his own account name, only the name of the guy with the horrible WR.

 

i was kidding, i tought this were his own account stats xD (since wg portal is down i couldnt check it out)

malachi6 #20 Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:03 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49881 battles
  • 3,448
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

Lots of reasons a person can have bad stats.  A buddy of mine lost a limb in Afghanistan  he plays and obviously, not as well as most people.  I do wish people could consider other reasons for being sub-par.  Rather than simply botting. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users