Jump to content


Autoaim suggestion


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

Argedeava #1 Posted 08 June 2018 - 04:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28873 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013
Add in the OPTIONS menu at Recticle the option to set the vertical height +/- at which aiming points aims whe locking to a targhet. I want to be able to set it just a little lower than the center.

wremise #2 Posted 08 June 2018 - 04:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 47596 battles
  • 846
  • [P4NTA] P4NTA
  • Member since:
    09-29-2011
nope, autoaim is as good as it is. autoaim should has it flaws

Jigabachi #3 Posted 08 June 2018 - 04:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,534
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
What about we remove it all together instead?

Edited by Jigabachi, 08 June 2018 - 04:22 PM.


etody77 #4 Posted 08 June 2018 - 04:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 61666 battles
  • 943
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

No need

The curent autoaim point help you to do most criticall damage, if you shoot from the side, but prevent you to pen from the front, using standard ammo



Argedeava #5 Posted 08 June 2018 - 04:33 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28873 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View Postwremise, on 08 June 2018 - 04:11 PM, said:

nope, autoaim is as good as it is. autoaim should has it flaws

 

Of cource it needs to have flaws. We don`t want to upset other businesses.

That` why i didn`t said to also add the option to automatically compensate for a moving target.



250swb #6 Posted 09 June 2018 - 08:27 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 21712 battles
  • 4,865
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Pressing 'auto aim' should really be, and remain, the dumbest thing you can do. Add options to auto aim and it makes a mockery of game balancing features like weak spots, not because auto aim will hit the weak spots, but weak spots rely on players aiming at them, not trying to discover the ideal auto aim setting to give them the easiest life. WOT should be a game of skill, not 'garage warriors' who try to win the game off the battlefield.

Baldrickk #7 Posted 09 June 2018 - 08:32 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29530 battles
  • 13,762
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013
Auto aim is for lobbing shots at the enemy while running for your life.
Which is probably 90% of all shots I fire.

When you're relying on RNG to hit in the first place, it doesn't really matter where on the tank it hits.

OP shoukd be glad they changed it a few years ago - AA used to consistently aim for gun mantlets

Bigtime_Alarm #8 Posted 09 June 2018 - 08:50 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17724 battles
  • 339
  • Member since:
    05-14-2013

Maybe it should lock on to a chosen module. Then it should lock onto that module even if the tank is in cover. Oh and it could fire the instant the tank became visible.

 

Definitely should have something like that, oh wait.........



Dorander #9 Posted 09 June 2018 - 09:52 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17854 battles
  • 2,297
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012

View Post250swb, on 09 June 2018 - 07:27 AM, said:

Pressing 'auto aim' should really be, and remain, the dumbest thing you can do. Add options to auto aim and it makes a mockery of game balancing features like weak spots, not because auto aim will hit the weak spots, but weak spots rely on players aiming at them, not trying to discover the ideal auto aim setting to give them the easiest life. WOT should be a game of skill, not 'garage warriors' who try to win the game off the battlefield.

 

There are a few perfectly legit reasons to autoaim where it isn't dumb at all. My hand-eye coordination isn't amazing, autoaim is way better than I am at hitting a target I'm driving past at 60+ km/h that I'm nearly guaranteed to pen, especially if I also have to look out for the rocks ahead as well.

 

It's also great for keeping your aim at a target when you're not in a position to go into sniper modeyet  because of safety (not in cover, tank overexposed). Autoaim, adjust tank, sniper mode, unlock autoaim, finish aim in manual mode, can shave a few tenths of a second off your aimtime.



Argedeava #10 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28873 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostBigtime_Alarm, on 09 June 2018 - 08:50 AM, said:

Maybe it should lock on to a chosen module. Then it should lock onto that module even if the tank is in cover. Oh and it could fire the instant the tank became visible.

 

Definitely should have something like that, oh wait.........

 

I already said i don`t want to interfere with other businesses.

I haven`t specified none of the above.

I haven`t specified to automatically adjust targhet based on shell velocity, distance to targhet, targhet speed.

I also haven`t specified to prioritise module targeting.

Oh, and there`s nothing new here.

 

View Post250swb, on 09 June 2018 - 08:27 AM, said:

Pressing 'auto aim' should really be, and remain, the dumbest thing you can do. Add options to auto aim and it makes a mockery of game balancing features like weak spots, not because auto aim will hit the weak spots, but weak spots rely on players aiming at them, not trying to discover the ideal auto aim setting to give them the easiest life. WOT should be a game of skill, not 'garage warriors' who try to win the game off the battlefield.

 

Why do i get the feeling that you see manual aming as the absolute peak of brain developement?

Edited by Argedeava, 09 June 2018 - 11:42 AM.


RamRaid90 #11 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:41 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20586 battles
  • 6,285
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Soyou want a coded in aimbot? Because you suck?

 

*edited* LOL!

 

Armour Suggestion:

 

Can my tank automatically angle itself to bounce an incoming shell please? Because I suck.


Edited by NickMustaine, 10 June 2018 - 09:35 AM.
Inappropriate remarks


Argedeava #12 Posted 09 June 2018 - 12:01 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28873 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostRamRaid90, on 09 June 2018 - 11:41 AM, said:

Soyou want a coded in aimbot? Because you suck?

 

*edited* LOL!

 

Armour Suggestion:

 

Can my tank automatically angle itself to bounce an incoming shell please? Because I suck.

 

You actually have a point. Let me raise the bar though with an even better suggestion:

Can there be a tank that doesn`t need to automatically angle to bounce, but instead bounce any shoot automatically aimed from any angle? Assuming of cource both shooter and targhet ar aproximately at the same height.

 



spidre #13 Posted 09 June 2018 - 04:16 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26864 battles
  • 324
  • Member since:
    10-16-2013

I was advised by my FC to use auto aim when firing at a fully exposed enemy. He assured us that more penetrations would result. He was right and this has stood me in good stead since. Of course it helps if you have a fully equipped tank and a well trained crew. No, I don't use an aimbot mod.

 



250swb #14 Posted 09 June 2018 - 04:23 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 21712 battles
  • 4,865
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View PostArgedeava, on 09 June 2018 - 10:38 AM, said:

 

Why do i get the feeling that you see manual aming as the absolute peak of brain developement?

 

It's a signpost along the way.........if you can read the signpost



panter22 #15 Posted 09 June 2018 - 04:31 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14981 battles
  • 381
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 08 June 2018 - 03:22 PM, said:

What about we remove it all together instead?

 

if the remove the aimbot WG will go bankrupt :(

 



HassenderZerhacker #16 Posted 09 June 2018 - 07:53 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 25567 battles
  • 2,255
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View Postwremise, on 08 June 2018 - 04:11 PM, said:

nope, autoaim is as good as it is. autoaim should has it flaws

 

these aren't flaws, many russian tanks have intentional autoaim defense. it's quite unfair

Argedeava #17 Posted 10 June 2018 - 04:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28873 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostHassenderZerhacker, on 09 June 2018 - 07:53 PM, said:

 

these aren't flaws, many russian tanks have intentional autoaim defense. it's quite unfair

 

Of cource they aren`t. This forum is not filled just with trolls that scream about their brains. And this was my point all along. Besides angering the trolls.

I can do just fine with or without autoaiming but those trolls and WG need to be told where they stand:

The actual typicall troll rage-sarcasm :

View Post250swb, on 09 June 2018 - 07:27 AM, said:

Pressing 'auto aim' should really be, and remain, the dumbest thing you can do. Add options to auto aim and it makes a mockery of game balancing features like weak spots, not because auto aim will hit the weak spots, but weak spots rely on players aiming at them, not trying to discover the ideal auto aim setting to give them the easiest life. WOT should be a game of skill, not 'garage warriors' who try to win the game off the battlefield.

Is already implemented!

WG listens...



RamRaid90 #18 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:17 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20586 battles
  • 6,285
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostArgedeava, on 10 June 2018 - 03:40 AM, said:

 

I can do just fine with or without autoaiming but those trolls and WG need to be told where they stand:

 

No you can't, you're bad. Very bad.



250swb #19 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:21 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 21712 battles
  • 4,865
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View PostArgedeava, on 10 June 2018 - 03:40 AM, said:

 

Of cource they aren`t. This forum is not filled just with trolls that scream about their brains. And this was my point all along. Besides angering the trolls.

I can do just fine with or without autoaiming but those trolls and WG need to be told where they stand:

The actual typicall troll rage-sarcasm :

Is already implemented!

WG listens...

 

Nice job, take the thread from an opening of 'I wanna make the game easier', to being a vigilante calling out trolls. But if that is what you are good at then make the most of it.

vasilinhorulezz #20 Posted 10 June 2018 - 09:35 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22780 battles
  • 1,097
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

Auto aim is only for circling targets or keeping your gun at enemies while you try to run away, and it should as such,

no changes needed.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users