Jump to content


anyone playing with T110 E5? WOT can delete this tank


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

ensarrr925 #1 Posted 09 June 2018 - 12:12 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 45529 battles
  • 58
  • [ESKYA] ESKYA
  • Member since:
    01-27-2013

it was great tank when updated for HD. now just trash. Super Conqueror better than E5. What is the positive feature from Conqueror ? just hull armor? not. everyone know how to hit easy hull armor of E5 and so easy hit to turret. Conqueror have best armored turret in game.

 

Now there is NO reason to go to E5. goodbye E5. we love you.

 

You can see how better Conqueror from E5 on this link:

https://tanks.gg/com...queror?t=t110e5



Suurpolskija #2 Posted 09 June 2018 - 12:19 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18698 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

Yes. And you have to suffer horrible tier8 and tier9 grinds for E5, too. No point. I gave up at T32, because why would I suffer that, if not for "research all tanks in the game".

 



Cuck0osNest #3 Posted 09 June 2018 - 03:42 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10460 battles
  • 1,019
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016
If SC is broken, why do you want E5 do be removed? Ahah, Just...this communities logic, where everything is upside down.

TankkiPoju #4 Posted 09 June 2018 - 07:09 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21017 battles
  • 6,445
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 09 June 2018 - 03:42 AM, said:

If SC is broken, why do you want E5 do be removed? Ahah, Just...this communities logic, where everything is upside down.

 

It's just an example. Even if the game didnt have SC at all, the current E5 would still be pretty bad.

Mr_Burrows #5 Posted 09 June 2018 - 07:23 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 45796 battles
  • 1,969
  • Member since:
    02-17-2012
Not played mine for... 2 years? When I finally bothered to get it, it had already been nerfed. Nowadays it seems to be almost extinct from the game anyway, so no need to delete it really. It sorta deleted itself. 

SABAOTH #6 Posted 09 June 2018 - 07:40 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37239 battles
  • 2,915
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
Need some love, but it's american so not really a priority for russian player base. Be patient sooner or later they will tweak it again.

N0zza #7 Posted 09 June 2018 - 10:44 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21626 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    12-29-2015

Only just got mine and find it to be very decent, over 4k average damage, mobile with good gun. Not the best but by no means the worst or even bad

 



Dava_117 #8 Posted 09 June 2018 - 10:51 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20284 battles
  • 3,659
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostCuck0osNest, on 09 June 2018 - 03:42 AM, said:

If SC is broken, why do you want E5 do be removed? Ahah, Just...this communities logic, where everything is upside down.

 

For once I have to agree with you.

E5 became OP after changing to HD model, got nerfed so now is balance and people complain because is not OP anymore! What's wrong? Why don't you ask to nerf SConqueror (giving it a real turret weackspot) and all the powercreeper tanks? :facepalm:


Edited by Dava_117, 09 June 2018 - 10:52 AM.


unrealname #9 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:00 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24034 battles
  • 1,153
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013
E5 is trash

gunslingerXXX #10 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:08 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11397 battles
  • 2,251
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

With so many tanks in the game, there will always be tanks worse at everything. Thats ok, the E5 is an older tank.

The E5 is my only tier 10, and I play it a bit in ranked and for high dmg missions. Grinded for over a year to get there. Fine for a casual player. I would appreciate a smaller cupola, but ok.

Playing tier 10 competitively on the other hand requires you to grind all the latest tanks, if you want to compete, deal with the fact you need to put in alot of time. Deal with the fact your efforts are not worthwhile for very long.



Laukaus #11 Posted 09 June 2018 - 02:56 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8859 battles
  • 120
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View Postunrealname, on 09 June 2018 - 10:00 AM, said:

E5 is trash

 

Yes, for now. But when many enough players have sold it, it will be buffed. 

 

Russian logic, see. 

 



TheDrownedApe #12 Posted 09 June 2018 - 04:46 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 44727 battles
  • 5,646
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
I actually still quite like playing it

N0zza #13 Posted 09 June 2018 - 06:54 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21626 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    12-29-2015

View Postunrealname, on 09 June 2018 - 11:00 AM, said:

E5 is trash

 

It really is not

unrealname #14 Posted 09 June 2018 - 10:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24034 battles
  • 1,153
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013

View PostN0zza, on 09 June 2018 - 07:54 PM, said:

 

It really is not

 

compared to what? M103 and T32? :D

Warzey #15 Posted 09 June 2018 - 10:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57424 battles
  • 964
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011
The thing is, if E5 had a bit smaller machine gun port on top it would be perfectly fine.

tank276 #16 Posted 09 June 2018 - 10:33 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50631 battles
  • 593
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-30-2012

Is the Super Conqueror better? Yes

Is the E5 trash? No



soul3ater #17 Posted 09 June 2018 - 10:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18842 battles
  • 635
  • [OMNIA] OMNIA
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012
make the mg port similar to m48, that's it.

Robbie_T #18 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17054 battles
  • 356
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    07-08-2016

I aint that bad that it needs to be delete'd

Just need a little tuning up but there are tanks that need it more than the T110E5



vasilinhorulezz #19 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:43 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
No, they don't need to delete E5, they just have to give SQ a weakspot, and probably less dpm.

Xandania #20 Posted 09 June 2018 - 11:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37416 battles
  • 1,108
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

View PostSuurpolskija, on 08 June 2018 - 11:19 PM, said:

Yes. And you have to suffer horrible tier8 and tier9 grinds for E5, too. No point. I gave up at T32, because why would I suffer that, if not for "research all tanks in the game".

 

 

That is exactly why I am suffering through the American and Russian tanks at the moment - well, and the Germans.

For some reason I had no problem grinding the Brits, Japanese or Chinese tanks.  But as soon as I take out an 'murican or russian med I fail more miserably than otherwise.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users