Jump to content


Insert opinion or rant about preferential matchmaking here

pmm preferential matchmaking KV5 KV-5 preferential matchmaking

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Poll: Preferential Matchmaking (41 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Against or for the preferential matchmaking removal ?

  1. Against (38 votes [84.44%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 84.44%

  2. For (7 votes [15.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 15.56%

Vote Hide poll

luxgil #1 Posted 10 June 2018 - 07:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26904 battles
  • 37
  • [-TB-] -TB-
  • Member since:
    08-18-2013

Hello everyone,

 

I personally own a KV-5 and I bought it because has preferential matchmaking and it was fun bouncing shots on the rear.

So I am against the removal of the KV-5 from the preferential matchmaking.

It's like buying a tank because it has a certain characteristic and then you remove it from it.

 

What do all of you think about either the changes they want to adapt to the KV-5 or/and the preferential matchmaking removal ?



Sfinski #2 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:07 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32246 battles
  • 2,747
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Isn't this pretty clear already what people think? The outcry has been already been heard. 

Flid_Merchant #3 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:08 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 9759 battles
  • 122
  • Member since:
    05-11-2015
Depends on what they do to the vehicles concerned. If they make them competitive in +/-2 then I'm not too bothered.

Spurtung #4 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:20 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 65982 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postluxgil, on 10 June 2018 - 08:55 PM, said:

What do all of you think about either the changes they want to adapt to the KV-5 or/and the preferential matchmaking removal ?

 

I think there are plenty other topics where you can express your opinion without creating a thread revolving around your personal situation.



gunslingerXXX #5 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:20 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11389 battles
  • 2,251
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

View PostFlid_Merchant, on 10 June 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

Depends on what they do to the vehicles concerned. If they make them competitive in +/-2 then I'm not too bothered.

 

Seems unlikely they will be competitive.

The defender is OP as fck at tier 8, however it seems hardly competitive in current MM. Basically competitive means stupidly overpowered when finally top tier.

 



Lycopersicon #6 Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:30 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 10610 battles
  • 3,570
  • Member since:
    07-30-2014

Such a lovely opportunity to vote for both, that I just had to do it.

 

Actually, I don't care.



Captain_Kremen0 #7 Posted 11 June 2018 - 02:40 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37612 battles
  • 1,582
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011
should this conversation be in the MM sticky?

Joggaman #8 Posted 11 June 2018 - 07:30 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 24419 battles
  • 6,499
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostLycopersicon, on 10 June 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

Actually, I don't care.

 

^^ This 

Lord_Barbarozza #9 Posted 11 June 2018 - 08:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 6645 battles
  • 104
  • Member since:
    03-22-2015

I want my tier 8 to get buffed because it meet tier 10s.

 

I want my tier 6 to get buffed because it meets tier 8s

 

I want my tier 4 to get buffed because it meets tier 6s.

 

ITS AN INGENIOUS IDEA TO BALANCE TANKS TO BE ABLE TO FACE 5 DIFFERENT TIERS, IT MAKES THE WHOLE STACK OF TIERS UNBALANCED UNTIL YOU REACH TIER 9 AND 10 WHICH CAN SEE TANKS FROM 4 AND 3 DIFFERENT TIERS. :facepalm:



Jigabachi #10 Posted 11 June 2018 - 08:24 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,588
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Well. I don't own one of those tanks, so I don't really care that much, but as long as they either balance the tanks properly or offer a kind of compensation, I'm fine with the change. Not really necessary, but those tanks were a mistake from the very start.

Warzey #11 Posted 11 June 2018 - 08:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57424 battles
  • 964
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

I would love for WG to go ahead with PMM removal. I don't particularly care what happens to KV-5 since I don't own one, but I'd like to see some buffs to rest of the useless T8 PMM, those tanks are so bad that WG would need to try really hard to make them worse. 

I believe that people who bought KV-5 only because of the PMM are a tinny tinny little vocal minority. I honestly don't remember the last time I saw a KV-5 in game.

I don't know about you guys but I bought PMM tanks because they were the only ones available at the time and on top of that they had decent performance. I will gladly sacrifice PMM to get up to decent performance level again.


Edited by Warzey, 11 June 2018 - 08:34 PM.


xx984 #12 Posted 11 June 2018 - 08:32 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 56430 battles
  • 2,617
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostWarzey, on 11 June 2018 - 07:29 PM, said:

I would love for WG to go ahead with PMM removal. I don't particularly care what happens to KV-5 since I don't own one, but I'd like to see some buffs to rest of the useless T8 PMM, those tanks are so bad that WG would need to try really hard to make them worse. 

I believe that people who bought KV-5 only because of the PMM are a tinny tinny little vocal minority. I don't know about you guys, but I don't remember the last time I saw a KV-5 in game. 

 

Playing a slightly worse tank, in comparison to other tier 8s, and only fighting tier 8's and 9's at the worse, is 100 times better than being in a slightly better tank fighting tier 10s every game

Warzey #13 Posted 11 June 2018 - 08:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57424 battles
  • 964
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Postxx984, on 11 June 2018 - 07:32 PM, said:

 

Playing a slightly worse tank, in comparison to other tier 8s, and only fighting tier 8's and 9's at the worse, is 100 times better than being in a slightly better tank fighting tier 10s every game

 

No it's not, playing tier 7,5 tank against tier 9 is way worse than playing a proper tier 8 tank against tier 10. With a proper tier 8 tank at least half of the enemy team is at the same "power level", but with a tier 7,5 tank the only "equal" tanks in the enemy team are other tier 7,5 tanks. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users