Jump to content


REALLY?! - T-54 ltwt. vs WZ132A


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

Pattonizer #1 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:35 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8709 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011


What the holy camel poo is this? 

Kozzy #2 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:38 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011
The WZ132A has to give something up for that OP gun elevation!  

Simeon85 #3 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:40 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,297
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013
Yeh I hated the 132-A, so much worse than the tier 8, WG seem to think a tier 9 light with 320 alpha and ok pen is so OP the rest of the tank has to be trash. 

Rati_Festa #4 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41407 battles
  • 1,079
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012
It costs 100k less... cheap chinese junk confirmed

pecopad #5 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22402 battles
  • 868
  • [UGN] UGN
  • Member since:
    09-04-2015

There are stats missing.

 

Wz has higher DPM, damage and penetration.

 

T54 ltw really sucks... don't have the Wz, but it will probably suck also



etody77 #6 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 61663 battles
  • 943
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

View Postpecopad, on 14 June 2018 - 01:57 PM, said:

There are stats missing.

 

Wz has higher DPM, damage and penetration.

 

T54 ltw really sucks... don't have the Wz, but it will probably suck also

 

wrong

sucked when was tir 8

now is a little russian beast

the chinese....could have cheap ammo, because all chinese products are cheap and bad



pecopad #7 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22402 battles
  • 868
  • [UGN] UGN
  • Member since:
    09-04-2015

View Postetody77, on 14 June 2018 - 03:07 PM, said:

 

wrong

sucked when was tir 8

now is a little russian beast

the chinese....could have cheap ammo, because all chinese products are cheap and bad

 

How is the ltw a beast, its much worst than the regular T54...

 

Maybe its better than the WZ, but still its a very bad tank. Actually the LTTB is much better tier 8 light than the Ltw is in tier IX...

 

Just take a look at the tank curves


Edited by pecopad, 14 June 2018 - 03:17 PM.


Pattonizer #8 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:20 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8709 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View Postpecopad, on 14 June 2018 - 12:57 PM, said:

There are stats missing.

 

Wz has higher DPM, damage and penetration.

 

T54 ltw really sucks... don't have the Wz, but it will probably suck also

 

Why is there always a dude who makes no sense at all?



Holly cow, that dpm is truly higher! :facepalm:

Ubervold #9 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20874 battles
  • 568
  • Member since:
    09-01-2012
Come on, you have to polish that turd.

8126Jakobsson #10 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 62792 battles
  • 3,101
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postetody77, on 14 June 2018 - 03:07 PM, said:

 

wrong

sucked when was tir 8

now is a little russian beast

the chinese....could have cheap ammo, because all chinese products are cheap and bad

 

Sucked when it was a tier 8? Is that why the tryhard setup was lightweights and IS-3's? :P

Simeon85 #11 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:49 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,297
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 14 June 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

 

Sucked when it was a tier 8? Is that why the tryhard setup was lightweights and IS-3's? :P

 

It wasn't great in randoms. It was just the best light in the team based modes where every tank is tier 8, mainly cos it might bounce the odd shot as everyone was spamming APCR. 

pecopad #12 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22402 battles
  • 868
  • [UGN] UGN
  • Member since:
    09-04-2015

View PostPattonizer, on 14 June 2018 - 03:20 PM, said:

 

Why is there always a dude who makes no sense at all?



Holly cow, that dpm is truly higher! :facepalm:

 

I wasn't making the case for the WZ, I even told that I don't own one, I was just saying that LTW was not a good tank, and that not all the info was presented.

 

I always liked the Chinese lights the better, but now, I don't even see the case to pass tier 7.The DA and the WZ are probably the best lights in the game, and one of the best tanks overall, IMHO.



PzTeufel #13 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 5561 battles
  • 98
  • Member since:
    09-17-2015
Pattonizer, this game is not Chinese. 

etody77 #14 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 61663 battles
  • 943
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015

View Postpecopad, on 14 June 2018 - 03:16 PM, said:

 

How is the ltw a beast, its much worst than the regular T54...

 

Maybe its better than the WZ, but still its a very bad tank. Actually the LTTB is much better tier 8 light than the Ltw is in tier IX...

 

Just take a look at the tank curves

 

LTG is better than LTTB

I liked it more at tier 9 than at tier 8



MeNoobTank #15 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:29 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10430 battles
  • 313
  • [R3L4X] R3L4X
  • Member since:
    02-16-2017

pff..and I thought that the tier 8 WZ is pretty meh but now...I am thinking to move to the medium line even if that is also bad.

 

Tier 7 WZ light was the best imo. Also I liked the tier 6 alot.



Pattonizer #16 Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8709 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View PostMeNoobTank, on 14 June 2018 - 03:29 PM, said:

pff..and I thought that the tier 8 WZ is pretty meh but now...I am thinking to move to the medium line even if that is also bad.

 

Tier 7 WZ light was the best imo. Also I liked the tier 6 alot.

 

Tier 8 WZ is pretty, you are not mistaken.

WindSplitter1 #17 Posted 15 June 2018 - 12:23 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15490 battles
  • 2,254
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016
It's RASHA. Why would you expect differently?

Flavortown #18 Posted 15 June 2018 - 02:07 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16141 battles
  • 800
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    02-15-2015

View PostPattonizer, on 14 June 2018 - 05:04 PM, said:

 

Tier 8 WZ is pretty, you are not mistaken.

 

tier 8 WAS pretty, now its meh.

Best light in that tier to be more precise 



Simeon85 #19 Posted 15 June 2018 - 09:30 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,297
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

The tier 8 is good, what's funny is that it's faster, way more agile and has better gun handling than the tier 9. 

 

it's barely an upgrade at all, you get alpha, penetration, 100 more DPM, 150 hit points and 10m view range, but worse mobility, worse gun handling, and worse camo I think 



brumbarr #20 Posted 15 June 2018 - 09:52 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostSimeon85, on 15 June 2018 - 09:30 AM, said:

The tier 8 is good, what's funny is that it's faster, way more agile and has better gun handling than the tier 9. 

 

it's barely an upgrade at all, you get alpha, penetration, 100 more DPM, 150 hit points and 10m view range, but worse mobility, worse gun handling, and worse camo I think 

 

The tank might not be good on paper, but it still works, that big dmg increase  matters a lot. 

For that dpm increase you lose abit of guhandling, but not a lot.

You are also smaller than the lwt with better camo, that extra armor doesnt matter anyway.

 

Otherwise I wouldnt be able to do this:

 

Posted Image

 

Rating/Wr/dpg/avg xp/ avg kill/ avg assist.

 

And if you check the hall of fame the dpg on the wz A is the the same as the t54lwt.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users