Jump to content


Non-Meta Tier X Medium Tanks --- Which ones you wouldn't grind


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

Poll: Worst, bad or not good enough. Describe why you don't like it or why you wouldn't want it. (92 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Which one of these you would not grind or dislike despite already having? (You may pick 2)

  1. Leopard 1 (54 votes [33.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.13%

  2. E 50 M (11 votes [6.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.75%

  3. M48A5 (4 votes [2.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.45%

  4. T-62A (10 votes [6.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.13%

  5. AMX 30 B (24 votes [14.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.72%

  6. Centurion Action X (9 votes [5.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.52%

  7. 121 (24 votes [14.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.72%

  8. STB-1 (22 votes [13.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.50%

  9. Progetto 65 (2 votes [1.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.23%

  10. TVP 50/51 (3 votes [1.84%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.84%

Vote Hide poll

WindSplitter1 #1 Posted 16 June 2018 - 09:31 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 16697 battles
  • 2,577
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

As above.


Edited by WindSplitter1, 16 June 2018 - 11:05 PM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #2 Posted 16 June 2018 - 09:38 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 51406 battles
  • 2,153
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016
Leo (ofc!), STB, WZ, T62 and to some degree the AMX.

Balc0ra #3 Posted 16 June 2018 - 09:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67496 battles
  • 17,182
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Well I've not unlocked the US, Italian and Chinese tier X meds. On tier  8, 7 and 9 respectively on those atm. Of those I've have done. The Leo 1 line is the only one I did not have a single keeper in. 

vasilinhorulezz #4 Posted 16 June 2018 - 09:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

WZ because 430U

and Leopard probably.

Although they're not the only problematic ones,

STB also feels a bit weak,

and I'm a bit uninterested in the TVP line.

 



Spurtung #5 Posted 16 June 2018 - 09:49 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 66183 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

It's just 121, not WZ-121.

Either way, that and the STB-1.

 

121 because it's been outclassed hard by the 430U, or even the T-62A, and STB-1 because of that potato launcher.


Edited by Spurtung, 17 June 2018 - 01:43 AM.


xx984 #6 Posted 16 June 2018 - 09:56 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 56488 battles
  • 2,628
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
i actually like all of these, to be honest, apart from the 121. Only one i dont have bought (have it researched though) is the AMX 30B and it doesn't seem that bad.

Shizuthink #7 Posted 16 June 2018 - 10:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35333 battles
  • 783
  • [ZEON] ZEON
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
T-62A is overshadowed by the 140. 121 is overshadowed by the 430U. CAX is overshadowed by the Patton. AMX 30B is I guess a bit better than the STB-1 thanks to the gunhandling but it's still not great for the meta. Leopard 1 is just tragic. E50M can be a lot of fun but could use a buff. Well, any one of them can be a lot of fun but some are definitely better than others.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #8 Posted 16 June 2018 - 10:11 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 51406 battles
  • 2,153
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostShizuthink, on 16 June 2018 - 11:03 PM, said:

T-62A is overshadowed by the 140. 121 is overshadowed by the 430U. CAX is overshadowed by the Patton. AMX 30B is I guess a bit better than the STB-1 thanks to the gunhandling but it's still not great for the meta. Leopard 1 is just tragic. E50M can be a lot of fun but could use a buff. Well, any one of them can be a lot of fun but some are definitely better than others.

 

What do you think needs a buff on the E50M? Like the turret front armor of the DPM?

Erwin_Von_Braun #9 Posted 16 June 2018 - 10:12 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 39208 battles
  • 5,274
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

Actually, none.

Kept all the ones I went for & would grind them again.



Balc0ra #10 Posted 16 June 2018 - 10:24 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67496 battles
  • 17,182
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Postxx984, on 16 June 2018 - 09:56 PM, said:

i actually like all of these, to be honest, apart from the 121. Only one i dont have bought (have it researched though) is the AMX 30B and it doesn't seem that bad.

 

Leo 1 is rather useless after the AMX 30 and K-91 came along. AMX 30 has a good gun, great pen, good alpha and great DPM. I sold my Leo PTA when I was done with the tier 9 AMX. It was better at everything after they got buffed, even with the worse dispersion. 

WindSplitter1 #11 Posted 16 June 2018 - 11:57 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 16697 battles
  • 2,577
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostSpurtung, on 16 June 2018 - 08:49 PM, said:

It's just 121, not WZ-121.

 

Yup, I confused it with the Type 69. I stand corrected.

Spurtung #12 Posted 17 June 2018 - 12:00 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 66183 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostWindSplitter1, on 17 June 2018 - 12:57 AM, said:

 

Yup, I confused it with the Type 69. I stand corrected.

 

Type 59? Type 61? :hiding:

Beltalowda #13 Posted 17 June 2018 - 12:03 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 63615 battles
  • 887
  • Member since:
    03-02-2011
Leopard 1 can't be buffed, it would make it too OP.

Maschinenkanone #14 Posted 17 June 2018 - 12:26 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38563 battles
  • 265
  • [MBEV] MBEV
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
Leopard for sure, by a large margin. For a bit of above average mobility it gave up too much in other Departments like armor or gun handling.

Xandania #15 Posted 17 June 2018 - 12:34 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37686 battles
  • 1,109
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

Admittedly I would personally grind each and every one of them.

 

I found the autoloading meds very annoying as they can pen most armorcrept heavies way too easily.

Other than that, I wouldn't recommend to grind the 121 - it is an aquired taste with truely horrible gun depression - and you have to find different ditches in it than with most other tanks due to differences in tank height



leggasiini #16 Posted 17 June 2018 - 08:59 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 15250 battles
  • 6,240
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

The combination of sub 250 APCR pen and 300 HEAT pen and 0.36 accuracy + mediocre velocity on AMX 30B seems just horrible at tier 10 meta. And Leo 1 for obvious reasons.



Bennie182 #17 Posted 17 June 2018 - 08:59 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54969 battles
  • 1,773
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012
I have only the Patton and sold a few that I had before, simply because the tier 10 meta is trash.

leggasiini #18 Posted 17 June 2018 - 09:03 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 15250 battles
  • 6,240
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 17 June 2018 - 01:00 AM, said:

 

Type 59? Type 61? :hiding:

 

I assume he meant this

 

In case you’re wondering, the factory designation of thing above is WZ-121, which renders the in-game 121 a likely fake, although this thing does resemble the 121 (other than the gun).



RamRaid90 #19 Posted 17 June 2018 - 09:29 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22505 battles
  • 6,698
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postleggasiini, on 17 June 2018 - 08:03 AM, said:

 

I assume he meant this

 

In case you’re wondering, the factory designation of thing above is WZ-121, which renders the in-game 121 a likely fake, although this thing does resemble the 121 (other than the gun).

 

Looks more like the Wz-132

 



Igor_BL #20 Posted 17 June 2018 - 09:31 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41332 battles
  • 1,480
  • [GX] GX
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015

View PostWindSplitter1, on 16 June 2018 - 09:31 PM, said:

As above.

 

Paton isnt meta, while 140 is meta?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users