Jump to content


Prototipo Standard B


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

1_9_1939 #21 Posted 19 November 2020 - 07:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7175 battles
  • 552
  • Member since:
    03-03-2014

Typical WG strategy - release slightly overpowered, then nerf to useless state to push ppl to grind new overpowered things or force to buy premium version.

 

No need to grind italian tech tree now, only pantera is not nerfed much because they have to mask p2w premium progetto to be "equal" to tech tree version (equal = only 2x better).

 

0/10 metacritic, i play only at christmas time and only arty and only troll style since you killed this line. Ignoring tech tree.


Edited by 1_9_1939, 19 November 2020 - 07:51 PM.


Snaques #22 Posted 04 December 2020 - 11:07 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 41395 battles
  • 899
  • Member since:
    01-08-2017

View Post1_9_1939, on 19 November 2020 - 07:38 PM, said:

No need to grind italian tech tree now, only pantera is not nerfed much because they have to mask p2w premium progetto to be "equal" to tech tree version (equal = only 2x better).

So you haven't even played them and you cry like a little girl?!

 

Pantera for me was better than Progetto and the higher tiers are still completely fine.



xxxSmurfHunterxxx #23 Posted 12 December 2020 - 02:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 10055 battles
  • 87
  • [HRV4T] HRV4T
  • Member since:
    07-04-2010
What is this tank status now? i finaly reached unlock. And now after nerfs i am wondering should i buy it. I love my T54E1 autoloarder, so i am concidering as well T57 as my next buy. Dont knwo what to go for, and miss on the other one. :D Is it still good spending hard earned credits on? :D

ZeroKelvin #24 Posted 12 December 2020 - 03:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44694 battles
  • 372
  • [W__F] W__F
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

View PostxxxSmurfHunterxxx, on 12 December 2020 - 01:33 PM, said:

What is this tank status now? i finaly reached unlock. And now after nerfs i am wondering should i buy it. I love my T54E1 autoloarder, so i am concidering as well T57 as my next buy. Dont knwo what to go for, and miss on the other one. :D Is it still good spending hard earned credits on? :D

If you love the T54E1, you will certainly love the T57.

 

So if you have to choose, T57, if not you can try the Standard B.



xxxSmurfHunterxxx #25 Posted 12 December 2020 - 06:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 10055 battles
  • 87
  • [HRV4T] HRV4T
  • Member since:
    07-04-2010

View PostZeroKelvin, on 12 December 2020 - 03:02 PM, said:

If you love the T54E1, you will certainly love the T57.

 

So if you have to choose, T57, if not you can try the Standard B.

I am sceptik to move forward to tier X, since they only spend a lot of credits,  mostly fight in 30v30, or only tier X. Tier IX is where i truly enyoj game play. So standard B was my main goal. Only it took me long enough that that line got nerfed. 

I look at profile WOTcompare GG, and standard B is more less better at everything but armor (that honestly i dont think T54E1 has, and can use since every shot towards me is pen). So it could be solid pick.


Edited by xxxSmurfHunterxxx, 12 December 2020 - 06:27 PM.


ZeroKelvin #26 Posted 14 December 2020 - 07:19 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44694 battles
  • 372
  • [W__F] W__F
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

So I just put the big gun on the otherwise stock tank in the current "nerfed" state Standard B

Crew is 2.8 skill, IRM, Bounty Vents, Bounty Stabilizer

 

If you think that tank needs a buff you need help, but then most T9 Autoloaders are devastating if you remotely know what you do.

 

Except the AMX50 120 :bush:


Edited by ZeroKelvin, 14 December 2020 - 07:20 PM.


dbiberche #27 Posted 01 May 2021 - 03:40 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14530 battles
  • 157
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014

Absolute crap tank as stock. Worst tier 9. Zero mobility, it feels like heavy but without armor. Terrible.

Pile of crap tank. Wasted time and credits on this crap.

 

What kind of medium is this with no [edited]mobility...


Edited by dbiberche, 01 May 2021 - 05:56 PM.


dbiberche #28 Posted 02 May 2021 - 02:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14530 battles
  • 157
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014
I hate this crap tank. Gun handling is terrible, aiming time also.

Veka26 #29 Posted 17 May 2021 - 09:19 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 60269 battles
  • 115
  • [KRUL] KRUL
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

This was my favorite T9 MT. Played it to 67% WR solo, and to 99% MoE at one point with regular equipment (stab, rammer, optics) and no food, before the nerfs.

Recently I tried it out with food, vents, improved aiming, and a vstab. The tank is still very good. Food and vents almost make up for the lack of rammer (if you played it without them before). If mobility is your main issue with it now, you can put turbo in the mobility slot, will try that out later.

I think this tank is still better than most tech tree T9 MTs, Miles better than Wz-120, 430 II, Bat AP.... For me at least it is because it is still flexible tank with decent if not great mobility, reliable autoreloading gun, good camo and great gun depression. It never feels situational and it works/plays similar in every matchup which is what I prefer instead of tanks that can be bullys as top tier thanks to armor and not that great when not top tier because they do not have a tier 10 gun at tier 9 like Stan B has.



dbiberche #30 Posted 22 May 2021 - 07:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14530 battles
  • 157
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014
It is OK tank but shell dispersion is horrible and gun handling is so so. For a glass canon, tank that has no armor, that is not so good. Arty and HE shells are my worst nightmare.

ZeroKelvin #31 Posted 28 May 2021 - 06:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44694 battles
  • 372
  • [W__F] W__F
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011
Still loving it, used it for the ToTT and calling it the Prototipo BAE




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users