Jump to content


Let's see what the players think about ±1 MM WG?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
19 replies to this topic

Poll: Let's see what the players think about ±1 MM WG? (44 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

If the MM was ±1 for any tier, would you be willing to wait an extra 10, 30 or even 60 seconds to enter a match?

  1. Yes, definitely!!! (36 votes [81.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 81.82%

  2. No, I want to enter asap w/o long waiting time. (8 votes [18.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

With the current ±2 MM are you having any fun?

  1. Yes, I'm having a blast. (_sarcasm_) (11 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. No, nope...it's getting tiresome after a few matches. (33 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

If the MM was ±1 do you think you would have more fun?

  1. Yes. (36 votes [81.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 81.82%

  2. No. (8 votes [18.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

If the MM was ±1 would you spend more time online playing the game?

  1. Yes. (24 votes [54.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 54.55%

  2. No. (9 votes [20.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.45%

  3. Maybe the same, more or less. (11 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

If the MM was ±1 do you think it would balance the current tanks tier for tier for the current state of the game at some minor degree?

  1. Yes, it would help some tanks suffering from power crip not getting rofl stomped by higher tier ones. (33 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

  2. No, I don't think so, but the ±1 MM is still welcomed. (11 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Hide poll

Sergeant_Antaro_Chronus #1 Posted 27 June 2018 - 11:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13968 battles
  • 622
  • [EL-G] EL-G
  • Member since:
    06-24-2013
This is just a simple poll about the broken MM, especially for tiers 4 to 8, to show and see if people actually want a ±1 MM and are whiling to wait a few extra seconds. Perhaps this can be past down the line or WG would come up with some kind of bollocks excuse again.

Homer_J #2 Posted 28 June 2018 - 12:05 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,982
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
Poll is broken.  Last question only has answers which support your deluded point of view.

chillsnotskills #3 Posted 28 June 2018 - 12:39 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16813 battles
  • 151
  • Member since:
    05-10-2014
5-10 would be great. It happens sometimes with this MM. 5 +1 tier tanks and 10 same tier tanks is really good, you can actually fight and do some s__t to the more less equal tanks. I wouldnt mind being in "bottom" tier because +1 tier tanks are ok to fight against and it can be fun. Being tier 10 now and fighting against 7 tier 8 tanks is just stupid.

Jigabachi #4 Posted 28 June 2018 - 12:52 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,006
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
We already have more than enough threads about this. Use the search function.
Besides that, the poll is very bad. And not only because it's biased.

Personally, I have absolutely no problem with the tierspread. What about asking for a fix of the balance first before we blame the MM?

Alabamatick #5 Posted 28 June 2018 - 12:55 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 3,009
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 27 June 2018 - 11:05 PM, said:

Poll is broken.  Last question only has answers which support your deluded point of view.

 

So is question 2, as the only "positive" answer has a [/sarcasm] tag

Homer_J #6 Posted 28 June 2018 - 12:57 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,982
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
Any reduction in tier spread would be a direct nerf of preferential mm tanks.  And look at the outrage that was caused just by WG saying they were thinking of maybe perhaps considering testing changes to preferential mm tanks.

snowlywhite #7 Posted 28 June 2018 - 01:12 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16025 battles
  • 188
  • Member since:
    01-05-2018

the outrage had nothing to do with WG thinking about changing the MM tanks

 

the outrage was generated by:

 

1. their offer of a "russian refund" - if you don't like the modifications to the tank in order to make it able to play in +2MM, you can swap it for another "for a small price"(which is beyond being jerks - basically totally change the tank you bought and if you don't like the changes, no prob, pay us so you swap it...)

2. suggesting that the problems with the MM are generated by the preferential MM tanks. Which everyone felt is a pile of bs and WG taking us for granted.

 

the outrage was never about the idea per se.



Homer_J #8 Posted 28 June 2018 - 01:18 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,982
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postsnowlywhite, on 28 June 2018 - 01:12 AM, said:

the outrage had nothing to do with WG thinking about changing the MM tanks

 

the outrage was generated by:

 

1. their offer of a "russian refund" - if you don't like the modifications to the tank in order to make it able to play in +2MM, you can swap it for another "for a small price"(which is beyond being jerks - basically totally change the tank you bought and if you don't like the changes, no prob, pay us so you swap it...)

2. suggesting that the problems with the MM are generated by the preferential MM tanks. Which everyone felt is a pile of bs and WG taking us for granted.

 

the outrage was never about the idea per se.

 

I see, so you would have been OK with them changing the mm of preferential mm tanks without any compensation.  In that case I think you are in a minority of one.

snowy76 #9 Posted 28 June 2018 - 02:32 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 27178 battles
  • 40
  • [KTTP] KTTP
  • Member since:
    09-25-2014

View PostJigabachi, on 28 June 2018 - 12:52 AM, said:

Personally, I have absolutely no problem with the tierspread. What about asking for a fix of the balance first before we blame the MM?

 

±2 is broken as hell, half the tier 10's cant handle a type 5 heavy so what chance does a AMX 65t. 

If you load in and you are a bottom tier heavy then you might as well AFK for all the fun you will have.



Robbie_T #10 Posted 28 June 2018 - 06:24 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16317 battles
  • 331
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    07-08-2016

Bad poll totally favors the side of +1 MM

I dont mind +2 MM



Nethraniel #11 Posted 28 June 2018 - 06:47 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13178 battles
  • 1,997
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012
Poll is useless. And for the record, I am OK with +2, just the 3/5/7 is not always useful. 

Element6 #12 Posted 28 June 2018 - 06:58 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29305 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
Why can't we have unbiased polls...

Nethraniel #13 Posted 28 June 2018 - 06:59 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13178 battles
  • 1,997
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-30-2012

View PostElement6_TheSprout, on 28 June 2018 - 06:58 AM, said:

Why can't we have unbiased polls...

 

Even scientists struggle at creating unbiased polls and statistics... So, not much hope here in the forums... :trollface:

wsatnutter #14 Posted 28 June 2018 - 07:04 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24935 battles
  • 7,567
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
bad poll so biased its un true

Element6 #15 Posted 28 June 2018 - 07:31 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29305 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View PostNethraniel, on 28 June 2018 - 06:59 AM, said:

Even scientists struggle at creating unbiased polls and statistics... So, not much hope here in the forums... :trollface:

Yep, and they tend to make polls that mainly revolve around "Yes" or "No", and some questions where you rate the level of agreement for a statement, from something like 1-5, where 1 is totally disagree, 5 is totally agree, 2 and 4 are variations and 3 is neutral.



Enforcer1975 #16 Posted 28 June 2018 - 09:09 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,857
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

What we need is more 7-5-3 then players will realize that having 3-5-7 isn't so bad when you are one of the 3 bottom tier 8 every time having to fight 7 tier 10 tanks like with the old MM. 

That being said 5-10 is nice and all but i'd rather nerf tier 9 and 10 to be closer to tier 7 and 8 to keep diversity. 


Edited by Enforcer1975, 28 June 2018 - 09:12 AM.


Jigabachi #17 Posted 28 June 2018 - 09:40 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,006
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postsnowy76, on 28 June 2018 - 02:32 AM, said:

±2 is broken as hell, half the tier 10's cant handle a type 5 heavy so what chance does a AMX 65t. 

If you load in and you are a bottom tier heavy then you might as well AFK for all the fun you will have.

Would you please re-read that post you quoted?



DuncaN_101 #18 Posted 28 June 2018 - 09:42 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,891
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Bad poll is bad.

Very biased and again I voted all options because I could.

Slyspy #19 Posted 28 June 2018 - 09:45 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14201 battles
  • 16,685
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

Personally I wouldn't mind seeing a change in MM to +/-1. But really I'd be happy to go to +/-2 without the templates as well. It is the latter which has really put me off coming back to playing regularly, not the tier spread.

 

Changing to MM to +/-1 would require a significant change to all the vehicles in the game in order to rebalance them, primarily to avoid certain vehicles which are already powerful tier-for-tier from being the only viable option. Any one who answered "Yes" to your final question simply hasn't thought beyond "I hate being bottom tier" before doing so.



Jahpero #20 Posted 28 June 2018 - 10:38 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 7677 battles
  • 1,222
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    07-03-2017

Hello everyone ! 

As you know we want you to use
this thread for every discussion related to the MM.. 

In consequence, this one is now locked.

Thank you for your understanding. :honoring:
Jahpero






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users