Jump to content


Tiger P, is it any good?


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

NoobySkooby #1 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:32 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 13041 battles
  • 2,810
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011
I have just started the grind on this tank which I have no choice but to do as I am after the VK.100.p. When I see these things in game they do seem to do very well.

evilchaosmonkey #2 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16655 battles
  • 1,756
  • [EIGHT] EIGHT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

No.

 

I speak on behalf of everyone who ever had to grind this utter piece of dog's excrement.

Anyone that says it's good probably spends the rest of their spare time in the corner of a room, facing the walls nodding slowly to themselves.

 

You can close the thread now.

 



FluffyRedFox #3 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:44 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22967 battles
  • 8,387
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
Easily one of the worst tier 7 heavies.

WarPig996 #4 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15784 battles
  • 137
  • [VO1D] VO1D
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
YIKES!!! :ohmy:

Desyatnik_Pansy #5 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:49 PM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 16425 battles
  • 25,851
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

It's easily the worst Tier VII Heavy IMO, though Black Prince is only slightly above it because it has a decent turret and AMX M4 45 Has goldspam for 330 Alpha going for it. Even that fail Caernarvon at Tier VII Is better IMO.

 

Also, I'm going to be that guy after reading the second sentence and just say, I don't think you'll do very well in it even if you see those things performing well. Somehow I suspect you'll take the most overpowered Tier VIII Heavy and make it look like one of the weakest, though I guess because of how poorly balanced that tank is you can still just triple+R And lol over poor Tier VIs and the likes.



SiliconSidewinder #6 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:50 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 27593 battles
  • 4,336
  • Member since:
    09-16-2012

sadly it's pretty bad.

the 200m front armor covers only a very small area and in exchange you get low DPM, bad mobility and loose the ability to angle properly at corners.



NoobySkooby #7 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:52 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 13041 battles
  • 2,810
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View Postevilchaosmonkey, on 02 July 2018 - 06:42 PM, said:

No.

 

I speak on behalf of everyone who ever had to grind this utter piece of dog's excrement.

Anyone that says it's good probably spends the rest of their spare time in the corner of a room, facing the walls nodding slowly to themselves.

 

You can close the thread now.

 

 

Ah ok consider thread and subject closed:popcorn:

Bordhaw #8 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:18 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11543 battles
  • 2,493
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostNoobySkooby, on 02 July 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:

Tiger P, is it any good?

 



FatigueGalaxy #9 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:23 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19273 battles
  • 2,116
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

Dunno. I had pretty good time with it. It can be a pain to deal with at distance. Armour has major weakspots but a piece of rock is enough to hide them most of the time (you hide one shoulder behind cover and second is invisible to enemy or has auto-bounce angle).

I played it before turret buff and it bounced quite a lot. Sure, only lower tier tanks, bad players or players who didn't bother to aim/got unlucky but it was enough - saved HP could be used to trade with higher tier tanks.

 



DracheimFlug #10 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:31 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8957 battles
  • 4,033
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014
I actually kind of like the thing. I've done better than my average in mine and it is one of the few tanks that I have managed to mark.

TheJumpMaster #11 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:32 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 47590 battles
  • 4,552
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011
I like mine

Hedgehog1963 #12 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51282 battles
  • 7,473
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
61% WR over 171 battles in mine... So yeah, good tank.

x5hunter #13 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12992 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    08-18-2013
It is not the worst....

Suurpolskija #14 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

I liked Tiger (P). I had all the modules for it except for tracks & turret though. I kind of played it like I would play VK45.03 so kinda heavy but if possible keep the engagements at a range where the rasha has to first get the blessing from Stalin to hit while I only have to battle the might of RNG. I like the 88, it's a good gun. 

 

Tiger (P) VII 69 2090,05 55,07%


Steeleye_Spam #15 Posted 02 July 2018 - 07:56 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28689 battles
  • 238
  • Member since:
    08-31-2014

its even worse because you have to grind two tanks to elite it.

 



Suurpolskija #16 Posted 02 July 2018 - 08:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

View PostSteeleye_Spam, on 02 July 2018 - 08:56 PM, said:

its even worse because you have to grind two tanks to elite it.

 

 

Four. 

#1 VK 45.02 A

#2 VK100.01P

#3 Ferdinand

#4 Tiger l

 

edit: People always complain that it's slow, but in truth, it's not that much slower than any other tier7 heavy and faster than O-Ni, T29 or Black Prince for sure. 


Edited by Suurpolskija, 02 July 2018 - 08:31 PM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #17 Posted 02 July 2018 - 08:36 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49628 battles
  • 1,761
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostSuurpolskija, on 02 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

edit: People always complain that it's slow, but in truth, it's not that much slower than any other tier7 heavy and faster than O-Ni, T29 or Black Prince for sure. 

 

Nope.

leggasiini #18 Posted 02 July 2018 - 08:55 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14187 battles
  • 6,194
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

It's just...bad. That kinda sums it up.

 

View PostSuurpolskija, on 02 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

 

Four. 

#1 VK 45.02 A

#2 VK100.01P

#3 Ferdinand

#4 Tiger l

 

The only tanks you actually have research are the VK 100 and 4502A.

 

Tiger I and Ferdi can be researched from other tanks


Edited by leggasiini, 02 July 2018 - 08:55 PM.


wEight_Tanker #19 Posted 02 July 2018 - 09:17 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7538 battles
  • 459
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016
I don't see why people think that TigerP is such a horrible tank... I've bought the Tiger I just months before selling the TigerP (I went from the TigerP straight to the Tiger I). The Tiger I is definitely better than the P. Much faster and has wayyy better gun handling on the same gun that the TigerP has. But It's got worse armor. That's not the point though. I would prefer Tiger I over the TigerP, but I don't think of TigerP being a bad tank like at all. The stock grind was painful, but I liked it a lot after unlocking every module, for real. It's a pretty nice tank. I really don't get these people. Probably because I'm a retarded Japanese Heavy grinder. :child:

Holdes #20 Posted 02 July 2018 - 09:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19833 battles
  • 601
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012
It's better that Black Prince, if you ask me. At least it has a gun that hits for more that a dozen of HP, and can go faster than 7 year old on a bicycle.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users