Jump to content


Fellow forumites concerned about WG`s costs - suggestion


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Argedeava #1 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31255 battles
  • 512
  • [GN-R] GN-R
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

As i saw many hard forumers (with a lot of posts) expressing their deep concern about WG`s costs with developement beying very critic about any suggestion becouse "people have no ideea about costs", i came with the following suggestion:

Add the option to increase winrate with gold.

Straight to the point...



Kozzy #2 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:29 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011
Plenty of people suck at this game no matter how much they spend...

Xandania #3 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:32 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36678 battles
  • 1,068
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
I though your winrate increase correlates to the amount of Fort Knox packs you buy?

Dr_ownape #4 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:40 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 44126 battles
  • 5,554
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

When people like this exist (no idea about money) WG will never have a problem

 



Kozzy #5 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:42 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostDr_ownape, on 12 July 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

When people like this exist (no idea about money) WG will never have a problem

 

Spoiler

 

 

But this game is pay2win, right?  Why does this guy not win more, since he paid so much?

Edited by Kozzy, 12 July 2018 - 11:42 AM.


speedphlux #6 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:45 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44197 battles
  • 1,808
  • [TZAR] TZAR
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011

View PostKozzy, on 12 July 2018 - 11:42 AM, said:

 

But this game is pay2win, right?  Why does this guy not win more, since he paid so much?

 

He is winning at enjoyment, which not always relates to in-game victory. Sometimes I get excited by the prospect of TK'ing a retarded teammate a lot more then from actual wins. So yeah - there's that ! :deer:

Enforcer1975 #7 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:50 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,887
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostDr_ownape, on 12 July 2018 - 11:40 AM, said:

When people like this exist (no idea about money) WG will never have a problem

 

How that guy and others like him play.....



LordMuffin #8 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:51 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48529 battles
  • 11,167
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostKozzy, on 12 July 2018 - 11:42 AM, said:

 

But this game is pay2win, right?  Why does this guy not win more, since he paid so much?

Just imagine how much he would have won if he didn't pay....



Kozzy #9 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:52 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostLordMuffin, on 12 July 2018 - 10:51 AM, said:

Just imagine how much he would have won if he didn't pay....

 



peekakilla #10 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:58 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10501 battles
  • 395
  • Member since:
    05-16-2016

View PostKozzy, on 12 July 2018 - 11:42 AM, said:

 

But this game is pay2win, right?  Why does this guy not win more, since he paid so much?

 

p2w means pay to get an advantage, you still need a brain to be able to use that advantage.

Argedeava #11 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31255 battles
  • 512
  • [GN-R] GN-R
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View Postpeekakilla, on 12 July 2018 - 11:58 AM, said:

 

p2w means pay to get an advantage, you still need a brain to be able to use that advantage.

 

Not to mention you need brains to actually make the payment!

And with this said, i thing the thread is getting right where is supposed to.


Edited by Argedeava, 12 July 2018 - 12:12 PM.


Kozzy #12 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:13 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostArgedeava, on 12 July 2018 - 11:09 AM, said:

 

Not to mention you need brains to actually make the payment!

 

So, does this guy have brains:

 

Spoiler

 

He spent a lot, but doesn't win a lot.



NoobySkooby #13 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:32 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14194 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostKozzy, on 12 July 2018 - 11:29 AM, said:

Plenty of people suck at this game no matter how much they spend...

 

I agree totally, I am one of them:popcorn:

Argedeava #14 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31255 battles
  • 512
  • [GN-R] GN-R
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostKozzy, on 12 July 2018 - 12:13 PM, said:

 

So, does this guy have brains:

 

Spoiler

 

He spent a lot, but doesn't win a lot.

 

What`s the most commonly used word in this forum?

Tip: Is the same as in zombie movies.



NoobySkooby #15 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:43 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 14194 battles
  • 3,231
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

They could always stop selling those damned premiums, now there's an idea, bad one maybe, but hey who gives a crapanyway?

 

 

Company sells thing

 

 

People buy

 

 

 

Just like any other company on earth so nothing to see here.



Balc0ra #16 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:45 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66618 battles
  • 16,642
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostArgedeava, on 12 July 2018 - 12:40 PM, said:

 

What`s the most commonly used word in this forum?

Tip: Is the same as in zombie movies.

 

​Twinkies?

Andrasan89 #17 Posted 12 July 2018 - 12:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6771 battles
  • 416
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostArgedeava, on 12 July 2018 - 11:26 AM, said:

As i saw many hard forumers (with a lot of posts) expressing their deep concern about WG`s costs with developement beying very critic about any suggestion becouse "people have no ideea about costs", i came with the following suggestion:

Add the option to increase winrate with gold.

Straight to the point...

 

you already have this option somehow...its called fkng P2W Defender 

StinkyStonky #18 Posted 12 July 2018 - 01:00 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28852 battles
  • 2,192
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

View PostArgedeava, on 12 July 2018 - 10:26 AM, said:

Add the option to increase winrate with gold.

Straight to the point...

 

If you consider "winrate" to be the "rate at which you win stuff" (silver and XP), rather than just the WR Number of wins Percentage, then we already have this in Premium Accounts and Premium tanks.

 

Now for the first "sentence"

View PostArgedeava, on 12 July 2018 - 10:26 AM, said:

As i saw many hard forumers (with a lot of posts) expressing their deep concern about WG`s costs 

This game is ludicrously expensive. £35 for a premium tank, i.e. a bit of DLC that delivers an almost identical play experience to what's free in game and merely increase earning rate ... £35.  You've got to be kidding me.

 

View PostArgedeava, on 12 July 2018 - 10:26 AM, said:

with developement beying very critic about any suggestion becouse "people have no ideea about costs",

I don't mean to be rude but I've no idea what you're on about. By "developement" do you mean the developers ? i.e. WG ? "people" (us players) "have no ideea about costs" ?? Costs of what ?  Buying stuff in the game (yest it's ludicrously expensive) or costs of developing new ideas ?

If the latter, how does your "gold for win rate" help anything ?  You've already admitted that you have no idea about costs and so development should be very critical of yuor suggestion.



Argedeava #19 Posted 12 July 2018 - 01:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31255 battles
  • 512
  • [GN-R] GN-R
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostStinkyStonky, on 12 July 2018 - 01:00 PM, said:

 

If you consider "winrate" ...bla bla........................................ih ih .......................................suggestion.

 



arthurwellsley #20 Posted 12 July 2018 - 01:55 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 51970 battles
  • 3,099
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostDr_ownape, on 12 July 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

When people like this exist (no idea about money) WG will never have a problem

 

 

Someone in another thread was suggesting that the Skorpion G was Over Powered, and here with a 37% win rate over 433 games is statistical proof that it is not.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users