Jump to content


What do you think about the 5/1 RAAC?

wot tank england world cup loose

  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

Andrasan89 #21 Posted 12 July 2018 - 05:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6643 battles
  • 35
  • [4-WAR] 4-WAR
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postarthurwellsley, on 12 July 2018 - 05:28 PM, said:

 

haha quoting Urban dictionary. You failed right there.

 

p2w literally means buying with real money something to help you win more.

It has nothing to do with getting faster gear or faster crafting.

 

quote whatever you want...meaning of P2W is same

and no, like i said hav nothing to do with winning more just because WOT have stats based on WR, but even with this in some moronic cases (defender) helps you even here...its like is wrote above, you get something BETTER, what f2p players cant so you are ABOVE them just because money.

In this game not, sure..nothing to do with crafting, or faster gear...because not thats the idea of this game. But its same thing if you think a bit.

In other games you buy things what allow you to craft better items, faster..etc. Here you buy them DIRETLY, and that mean tanks. You dont need to create them, you dont need to do anything to make them better...you simply GET THEM BETTER directly because money. 

P2W means a lot and for each game different..from crafting to modding or to get hings directly better (like WOT) but idea is SAME. BETTER THINGS THAN STANDARD ONES !

To be on subject still...watch on tanks.gg. Cent 5/1 is just BETTER than Cent 1. Pay To Win in one expression :facepalm:



Hedgehog1963 #22 Posted 12 July 2018 - 07:01 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50566 battles
  • 7,209
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostAndrasan89, on 12 July 2018 - 04:39 PM, said:

 

quote whatever you want...meaning of P2W is same

and no, like i said hav nothing to do with winning more just because WOT have stats based on WR, but even with this in some moronic cases (defender) helps you even here...its like is wrote above, you get something BETTER, what f2p players cant so you are ABOVE them just because money.

In this game not, sure..nothing to do with crafting, or faster gear...because not thats the idea of this game. But its same thing if you think a bit.

In other games you buy things what allow you to craft better items, faster..etc. Here you buy them DIRETLY, and that mean tanks. You dont need to create them, you dont need to do anything to make them better...you simply GET THEM BETTER directly because money. 

P2W means a lot and for each game different..from crafting to modding or to get hings directly better (like WOT) but idea is SAME. BETTER THINGS THAN STANDARD ONES !

To be on subject still...watch on tanks.gg. Cent 5/1 is just BETTER than Cent 1. Pay To Win in one expression :facepalm:

 

So you like your Primo Victoria?

Homer_J #23 Posted 12 July 2018 - 07:18 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27475 battles
  • 28,486
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostAndrasan89, on 12 July 2018 - 12:43 PM, said:

 

but why should paying players have ALL advantages on same package?? On a F2P called game??

 

So other people can play for free.

 

It's play for free, not win for free.  Fort Knox or GTFO. :P



Andrasan89 #24 Posted 12 July 2018 - 08:34 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6643 battles
  • 35
  • [4-WAR] 4-WAR
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostHedgehog1963, on 12 July 2018 - 07:01 PM, said:

 

So you like your Primo Victoria?

no, but im a collector..kinda...not top one

 

View PostHomer_J, on 12 July 2018 - 07:18 PM, said:

So other people can play for free.

 

It's play for free, not win for free.  Fort Knox or GTFO. :P

with other words...PayToWin !



NoobySkooby #25 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9171 battles
  • 1,427
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostBmilan_NIL, on 12 July 2018 - 12:38 PM, said:

I want to use it for fun and credit making. I already got a Cromwell B I can us it for crew. 

 

Good luck on the credit making, the only way I can think of credit making is either play lights and just yolo after arty,  use no consumables or even ammo whatsoever, or sell every [edited]tank you own, hitting things makes not a blind bit of difference, although I would dearly love to hit some WG staff right now, preferably with a spiked baseball bat.

Search_Warrant #26 Posted 12 July 2018 - 11:48 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26374 battles
  • 5,750
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostHedgehog1963, on 12 July 2018 - 06:01 PM, said:

 

So you like your Primo Victoria?

 

Primo is literally copy paste of tech tree cent apart from higher velocity shells but that comes as a cost with the APCR standard having worse normalisation.

 

RAAC is a straight upgrade and to be fair the other cents should get the same buffs, it seriously needs them to compensate that trashpounder. the upper hull armor has saved me more than once.


Edited by Search_Warrant, 12 July 2018 - 11:49 PM.


Mike_Mckay #27 Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17844 battles
  • 1,308
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    09-02-2015

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 12 July 2018 - 02:53 PM, said:

 

Fixed.

 

Surely to fix that properly you also needed to add the missing "A" from the end :)

Hedgehog1963 #28 Posted 13 July 2018 - 04:05 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50566 battles
  • 7,209
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostAndrasan89, on 12 July 2018 - 07:34 PM, said:

no, but im a collector..kinda...not top one

 

with other words...PayToWin !

 

The point being you keep banging on about P2W but you have premium tanks.

Bmilan_NIL #29 Posted 13 July 2018 - 10:48 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7830 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
    07-07-2013
I think I'll change some free xp instead of  buy this copy paste weak tank :)

Edited by Bmilan_NIL, 13 July 2018 - 10:49 AM.


Andrasan89 #30 Posted 13 July 2018 - 01:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6643 battles
  • 35
  • [4-WAR] 4-WAR
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostHedgehog1963, on 13 July 2018 - 04:05 AM, said:

 

The point being you keep banging on about P2W but you have premium tanks.

 

like i said im a colector...i buy them for diversity, exclusivity, for their look...credits, crews...etc..for what premium tanks ARE SUPOSED TO BE !

NEVER EVER i can agree with P2W !!

ill gladly pay for anything what i said above, but NEVER for P2W ! Its disgusting and not fair :facepalm:


Edited by Andrasan89, 13 July 2018 - 01:17 PM.


Hedgehog1963 #31 Posted 13 July 2018 - 01:27 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50566 battles
  • 7,209
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostAndrasan89, on 13 July 2018 - 12:16 PM, said:

 

like i said im a colector...i buy them for diversity, exclusivity, for their look...credits, crews...etc..for what premium tanks ARE SUPOSED TO BE !

NEVER EVER i can agree with P2W !!

ill gladly pay for anything what i said above, but NEVER for P2W ! Its disgusting and not fair :facepalm:

 

The Primo  and the RAAC are pretty much the same tank.  The differences are minor so stow your hysterics.

signal11th #32 Posted 13 July 2018 - 01:37 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 34918 battles
  • 5,426
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostAndrasan89, on 13 July 2018 - 12:16 PM, said:

 

like i said im a colector...i buy them for diversity, exclusivity, for their look...credits, crews...etc..for what premium tanks ARE SUPOSED TO BE !

NEVER EVER i can agree with P2W !!

ill gladly pay for anything what i said above, but NEVER for P2W ! Its disgusting and not fair :facepalm:

 

Well considering I'm running a 46% WR in the Cent 5-1 I'm hardly inclined to say it's pay to win because I paid but I ain't winning.

Search_Warrant #33 Posted 13 July 2018 - 02:12 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26374 battles
  • 5,750
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostHedgehog1963, on 13 July 2018 - 12:27 PM, said:

 

The Primo  and the RAAC are pretty much the same tank.  The differences are minor so stow your hysterics.

 

Not really. primo upper plate 150 effective using 10 gundep.

 

RAAC upper plate using 10 gundep is 250. thats a massive difference.



Andrasan89 #34 Posted 13 July 2018 - 02:31 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6643 battles
  • 35
  • [4-WAR] 4-WAR
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostHedgehog1963, on 13 July 2018 - 01:27 PM, said:

 

The Primo  and the RAAC are pretty much the same tank.  The differences are minor so stow your hysterics.

dont need to be WAY better...its enough to be just a bit better to be called P2W. 

And compare it with standard Centurion not with other premiums...theres no point :facepalm:

View Postsignal11th, on 13 July 2018 - 01:37 PM, said:

 

Well considering I'm running a 46% WR in the Cent 5-1 I'm hardly inclined to say it's pay to win because I paid but I ain't winning.

see above what p2w means



Soree #35 Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6000 battles
  • 2
  • [DAMD] DAMD
  • Member since:
    04-08-2017

I don't think it should see tier 6 since it can just bollock the tier 8s on the enemy team then just plaster all the lower tiers. 

 

When there's a platoon of 3 of them it's just a slaughter no matter what tier they get into. I'd say it's a little too good since it's pretty much a tier 8.5/9 and can be bought instead of earned but hey-hoo. I'm enjoying mine :hiding:



Search_Warrant #36 Posted 13 July 2018 - 03:28 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26374 battles
  • 5,750
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostSoree, on 13 July 2018 - 02:19 PM, said:

I don't think it should see tier 6 since it can just bollock the tier 8s on the enemy team then just plaster all the lower tiers. 

 

When there's a platoon of 3 of them it's just a slaughter no matter what tier they get into. I'd say it's a little too good since it's pretty much a tier 8.5/9 and can be bought instead of earned but hey-hoo. I'm enjoying mine :hiding:

 

then you realise the LFP is like 100mm effective and is terrible



PoIestar #37 Posted 13 July 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31385 battles
  • 4,044
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

It's a solid little tank if you ask me. The armor on the turret is great against tier 6-8 tanks, lackluster but quite surprisingly against 9-10. It's quite sluggish, which is basically my only remark on it, because the gun is really comfortable.

 

Do I recommend it? Absolutely not. It doesn't make great credits and it has a few obvious limitations which make it sub par compared to some other tanks you could also buy. For instance, a T26E5 (or Patriot) is like this tank but better.

 

I like the Centurion as a whole and it's a great little collector tank next to my 7/1. But that makes me biased, because objectively seen it's average/decent.



PoIestar #38 Posted 13 July 2018 - 05:04 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31385 battles
  • 4,044
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View PostSoree, on 13 July 2018 - 03:19 PM, said:

I don't think it should see tier 6 since it can just bollock the tier 8s on the enemy team then just plaster all the lower tiers. 

 

When there's a platoon of 3 of them it's just a slaughter no matter what tier they get into. I'd say it's a little too good since it's pretty much a tier 8.5/9 and can be bought instead of earned but hey-hoo. I'm enjoying mine :hiding:

 

I don't really agree on the tier 8.5/9 part. The Centurion 7/1, with exception of the turret armor, is all-round better, and that's a rather mediocre/circumstantial tier 9. It's not too good, it's just above average.

Hedgehog1963 #39 Posted 13 July 2018 - 10:56 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50566 battles
  • 7,209
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostAndrasan89, on 13 July 2018 - 01:31 PM, said:

dont need to be WAY better...its enough to be just a bit better to be called P2W. 

And compare it with standard Centurion not with other premiums...theres no point :facepalm:

see above what p2w means

 

The point being you're banging on about the one while you own the other.

Hedgehog1963 #40 Posted 13 July 2018 - 10:56 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50566 battles
  • 7,209
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 13 July 2018 - 01:12 PM, said:

 

Not really. primo upper plate 150 effective using 10 gundep.

 

RAAC upper plate using 10 gundep is 250. thats a massive difference.

 

Close enough for government work...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users