Jump to content


Rigged matchmaking?

MM RNG rigged

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
11 replies to this topic

Drumefy #1 Posted 18 July 2018 - 04:38 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8967 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012

I strongly believe that there is a differentiated MM, based on the vehicle you drive. It cannot be othewise. Let me explain:

 

I have a general WR of ~50%
I've played five tanks recently:
P.43 - WR 59%
Ikv 65 II - WR 53%
P.43 bis - WR 52%
Ikv 90B - WR 56%

and then there is P.43 ter - WR 38% after 40 battles.

I have over 800 average dmg per battle in it. 300dmg more than I had on Tiger II, which has a WR of 48%.

 

My statement is: it's absolutely impossible that the matchmaking is random! In this tank I almost always get thrown in a team of *edit, who immediately lose. I had battles in it where I've done 2,5k dmg and still lost.

 

On the other hand I am not incredibly good in the Ikv90B, perform just slightly better when it comes to dmg per game, yet it has WR of 56%.

 

What the hell is going on with the matchmaking? Is it completely rigged at this point?


Edited by Mlddim, 18 July 2018 - 05:15 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


jabster #2 Posted 18 July 2018 - 04:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12532 battles
  • 22,811
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostDrumefy, on 18 July 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

I strongly believe that there is a differentiated MM, based on the vehicle you drive. It cannot be othewise. Let me explain:

 

I have a general WR of ~50%
I've played five tanks recently:
P.43 - WR 59%
Ikv 65 II - WR 53%
P.43 bis - WR 52%
Ikv 90B - WR 56%

and then there is P.43 ter - WR 38% after 40 battles.

I have over 800 average dmg per battle in it. 300dmg more than I had on Tiger II, which has a WR of 48%.

 

My statement is: it's absolutely impossible that the matchmaking is random! In this tank I almost always get thrown in a team of *edit, who immediately lose. I had battles in it where I've done 2,5k dmg and still lost.

 

On the other hand I am not incredibly good in the Ikv90B, perform just slightly better when it comes to dmg per game, yet it has WR of 56%.

 

What the hell is going on with the matchmaking? Is it completely rigged at this point?

 

Yes, WG is picking on you.


Edited by Mlddim, 18 July 2018 - 05:16 PM.


Holdes #3 Posted 18 July 2018 - 04:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18776 battles
  • 548
  • Member since:
    06-10-2012
You had 48% winrate in Tiger II with average damage 450? You should consider yourself lucky then.   :facepalm: 

Kozzy #4 Posted 18 July 2018 - 04:50 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostDrumefy, on 18 July 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

I strongly believe that there is a differentiated MM, based on the vehicle you drive. It cannot be othewise. Let me explain:

 

 

 

Of course it is.  Why else would I get 59% in my E25 and only about 46% in my TVP VTU?



peekakilla #5 Posted 18 July 2018 - 04:51 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10122 battles
  • 395
  • Member since:
    05-16-2016
craphappens move on, don't let bad games influence your current game, if needed take a break.

Drumefy #6 Posted 18 July 2018 - 04:53 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8967 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012

View PostKozzy, on 18 July 2018 - 03:50 PM, said:

 

Of course it is.  Why else would I get 59% in my E25 and only about 46% in my TVP VTU?

 

View Postjabster, on 18 July 2018 - 03:42 PM, said:

 

Yes, WG is picking on you.

 

You know well that's not what I'm talking about. I know that you won't have an identical WR on all vehicles you play.

 

However, if I play a line of similar vehicles, with a similar playstyle and I'm doing averagely well in all of them, one of them shouldn't have a 15-20% lower WR than the other two, huh?
WR under 40% is when you are horribly bad in a given vehicle, and that's not the case, guys.

 

Plus, E25 is the most OP vehicle in the entire game, so your argument is invalid.


Edited by Drumefy, 18 July 2018 - 04:54 PM.


Nazgarth #7 Posted 18 July 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28472 battles
  • 1,135
  • [-TWO-] -TWO-
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

View PostDrumefy, on 18 July 2018 - 04:53 PM, said:

 

 

You know well that's not what I'm talking about. I know that you won't have an identical WR on all vehicles you play.

 

However, if I play a line of similar vehicles, with a similar playstyle and I'm doing averagely well in all of them, one of them shouldn't have a 15-20% lower WR than the other two, huh?
WR under 40% is when you are horribly bad in a given vehicle, and that's not the case, guys.

 

Plus, E25 is the most OP vehicle in the entire game, so your argument is invalid.

 

You need to understand that a sample size of 40 is far too small, if you happen to win 5 games in a row up to a total of 45 games you will have about your average w/r. Then we have the fact that you got massively lucky with anything above 40% w/r on your tiger 2, etc etc...

Edited by Nazgarth, 18 July 2018 - 05:01 PM.


duijm #8 Posted 18 July 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42667 battles
  • 1,757
  • [RANGX] RANGX
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostDrumefy, on 18 July 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

 

 

You know well that's not what I'm talking about. I know that you won't have an identical WR on all vehicles you play.

 

However, if I play a line of similar vehicles, with a similar playstyle and I'm doing averagely well in all of them, one of them shouldn't have a 15-20% lower WR than the other two, huh?
WR under 40% is when you are horribly bad in a given vehicle, and that's not the case, guys.

 

Plus, E25 is the most OP vehicle in the entire game, so your argument is invalid.

 

E25 most op? Not really.  Only in good hands. And today to many bad maps.

 

I also had tanks with nice wn8 and low winrate. That is random. So lately I am trying to mske them all 50%.  Just play 100 more games and it will get better if you can play the tank......you also could have been lucky with the p43 bis


Edited by duijm, 18 July 2018 - 05:02 PM.


jabster #9 Posted 18 July 2018 - 05:03 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12532 battles
  • 22,811
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostDrumefy, on 18 July 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

 

 

You know well that's not what I'm talking about. I know that you won't have an identical WR on all vehicles you play.

 

However, if I play a line of similar vehicles, with a similar playstyle and I'm doing averagely well in all of them, one of them shouldn't have a 15-20% lower WR than the other two, huh?
WR under 40% is when you are horribly bad in a given vehicle, and that's not the case, guys.

 

Plus, E25 is the most OP vehicle in the entire game, so your argument is invalid.

 

What are you on about. I agree with you, that’s impossible so WG are clearly picking on you. What have you done to upset them?

Drumefy #10 Posted 18 July 2018 - 05:12 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8967 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012

View Postjabster, on 18 July 2018 - 04:03 PM, said:

 

What are you on about. I agree with you, that’s impossible so WG are clearly picking on you. What have you done to upset them?

 

I ate all of their tinfoil hats once...

OIias_of_Sunhillow #11 Posted 18 July 2018 - 05:13 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24133 battles
  • 2,390
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011

View PostDrumefy, on 18 July 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

I strongly believe that there is a differentiated MM, based on the vehicle you drive. It cannot be othewise. Let me explain:

 

I have a general WR of ~50%
I've played five tanks recently:
P.43 - WR 59%
Ikv 65 II - WR 53%
P.43 bis - WR 52%
Ikv 90B - WR 56%

and then there is P.43 ter - WR 38% after 40 battles.

I have over 800 average dmg per battle in it. 300dmg more than I had on Tiger II, which has a WR of 48%.

 

My statement is: it's absolutely impossible that the matchmaking is random! In this tank I almost always get thrown in a team of *edit, who immediately lose. I had battles in it where I've done 2,5k dmg and still lost.

 

On the other hand I am not incredibly good in the Ikv90B, perform just slightly better when it comes to dmg per game, yet it has WR of 56%.

 

What the hell is going on with the matchmaking? Is it completely rigged at this point?

 

Do what I do.

After the battle reaffirm your belief by taking a look at the 0 damage players.

I make notes, and diagrams. Models.

Treatises, essays, pamphlets; all through the years, and tanks.

My shed is full, my garage is overflowing, and my dog's bowl is full of various papers.

I have venn-diagrams, pie-charts, graphs, blueprints(?), charts, and maps.

 

My wife thinks I'm nuts, but you and me OP, we're onto something.


Edited by Mlddim, 18 July 2018 - 05:20 PM.


Mlddim #12 Posted 18 July 2018 - 05:14 PM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 1274 battles
  • 29
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    03-27-2018

Hello,

 

This thread has been closed. For this topic, please use the pinned thread for Matchmaking Discussions.

 

Have a nice evening!

 

Mlddim







Also tagged with MM, RNG, rigged

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users