Jump to content


wn8 & spotting

wn8 spotiing gameplay

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Sandal #1 Posted 21 July 2018 - 02:19 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 34420 battles
  • 76
  • [-PNF-] -PNF-
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

Hello,

 

 

Is it only me or you also thinks wn8 is broken when it comes to spotting ? 

 

 

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_002.jpg   939.57K
  • Attached File   shot_003.jpg   957.25K
  • Attached File   shot_004.jpg   993.78K
  • Attached File   shot_005.jpg   940.98K


Balc0ra #2 Posted 21 July 2018 - 02:20 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64420 battles
  • 15,443
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
WN8 is calculated based on stats they get from the server that WG shares. Assist is not one of them. Thus WN8 don't take that into account when calculating it iirc. 

Sandal #3 Posted 21 July 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 34420 battles
  • 76
  • [-PNF-] -PNF-
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 21 July 2018 - 02:20 PM, said:

WN8 is calculated based on stats they get from the server that WG shares. Assist is not one of them. Thus WN8 don't take that into account when calculating it iirc. 

 

Oh ok. I didnt knew that. so its kinda broken cuz in some battles thats only thing you can do when bots in your team decide to camp on lane 1 or sth.

Anyway thank you very much for your help.

 



SuedKAT #4 Posted 21 July 2018 - 02:39 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,286
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

This is the wiki on WN8: http://wiki.wnefficiency.net/pages/WN8

It's not broken, it's just not including one thing that wasn't possible to get from the API at the time of it's creation.



Jigabachi #5 Posted 21 July 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,542
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
A little research before starting a thread really doesn't hurt...

Cuck0osNest #6 Posted 21 July 2018 - 02:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7429 battles
  • 795
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016
RR is not broken, because uses spotting as balancing.

Edited by Cuck0osNest, 21 July 2018 - 03:03 PM.


SuedKAT #7 Posted 21 July 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,286
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

View PostCuck0osNest, on 21 July 2018 - 02:56 PM, said:

RR is not broken, because uses spotting as balancing.

 

I'm not sure if I should cry or laugh...

WindSplitter1 #8 Posted 21 July 2018 - 03:43 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15542 battles
  • 2,269
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostCuck0osNest, on 21 July 2018 - 01:56 PM, said:

RR is not broken, because uses spotting as balancing.

 

What is "RR"?

Cuck0osNest #9 Posted 21 July 2018 - 04:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7429 battles
  • 795
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostWindSplitter1, on 21 July 2018 - 03:43 PM, said:

 

What is "RR"?

Closest to skill evaluation procedure hated by low-level 60% full platoon winrate padders and those who can't win with gold rounds and by arty players cos they think playing arty requires efforts apart from simple aiming skills.


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 21 July 2018 - 04:25 PM.


WindSplitter1 #10 Posted 21 July 2018 - 04:21 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15542 battles
  • 2,269
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostCuck0osNest, on 21 July 2018 - 03:16 PM, said:

Closest to skill evaluation procedure. 

 

What does it stand for?

 

I like Norse mythology too, btw



Cuck0osNest #11 Posted 21 July 2018 - 04:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7429 battles
  • 795
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostWindSplitter1, on 21 July 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

 

What does it stand for?

 

I like Norse mythology too, btw

See, you already heard about it. Play with interest and you will win.

​ ​

WindSplitter1 #12 Posted 21 July 2018 - 09:21 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15542 battles
  • 2,269
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostCuck0osNest, on 21 July 2018 - 03:29 PM, said:

See, you already heard about it. Play with interest and you will win.

 

Ragnarock?

Jigabachi #13 Posted 22 July 2018 - 12:05 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,542
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostWindSplitter1, on 21 July 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

What does it stand for?

Don't...

Seriously. You don't want to open that box...



ogremage #14 Posted 22 July 2018 - 06:49 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32911 battles
  • 1,402
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostSuedKAT, on 21 July 2018 - 01:39 PM, said:

This is the wiki on WN8: http://wiki.wnefficiency.net/pages/WN8

It's not broken, it's just not including one thing that wasn't possible to get from the API at the time of it's creation.

Still not possible. Lobby WG to add it.



Homer_J #15 Posted 22 July 2018 - 07:29 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postogremage, on 22 July 2018 - 06:49 AM, said:

Still not possible. Lobby WG to add it.

 

What? Lobby WG to add stats they never collected in the first place?

WindSplitter1 #16 Posted 22 July 2018 - 02:01 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15542 battles
  • 2,269
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostJigabachi, on 21 July 2018 - 11:05 PM, said:

Don't...

Seriously. You don't want to open that box...

 

...I'll take your advice then.

Bordhaw #17 Posted 22 July 2018 - 04:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10854 battles
  • 1,999
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostCuck0osNest, on 21 July 2018 - 03:16 PM, said:

Closest to skill evaluation procedure hated by low-level 60% full platoon winrate padders and those who can't win with gold rounds and by arty players cos they think playing arty requires efforts apart from simple aiming skills.

 

 







Also tagged with wn8, spotiing, gameplay

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users