Jump to content


Centurion Action X or Patton?

centurion action x patton centurion hull down

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

xmsy09x #1 Posted 25 July 2018 - 01:15 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3946 battles
  • 5
  • [NEOS1] NEOS1
  • Member since:
    12-28-2011

Hi guys,

Which of these tanks is better?

I actually LOVE the Primo Victoria and i want the best medium tank tier 10 that is good in hull down :hiding: (i really like this type of gameplay). In tanksgg i see that the turret of the patton is a little better but some players told me the opposite :amazed:

Currently i have the MAE2 (tier 6 american), if i have to go for the Centurion i have to start the new tree but i can do if you say that action X is better.

 

Ty



undutchable80 #2 Posted 26 July 2018 - 07:06 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7279 battles
  • 1,752
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014
Why limit yourself? Do both. I am. :B

xmsy09x #3 Posted 26 July 2018 - 08:18 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3946 battles
  • 5
  • [NEOS1] NEOS1
  • Member since:
    12-28-2011
I don't have enough time to play 3 tree (centurion, patton and progetto)

Suurpolskija #4 Posted 26 July 2018 - 08:26 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016
I have neither but I'm slowly grinding for both. The way I've heard (and seen in videos) they play quite similar so you can't go wrong here. For me the CAX seems more tempting. Mostly because I somehow think the tier9 grind will be smoother with 7/1 than with M46 because of the pen. And Centurion AX looks badass too. 

Eokokok #5 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:28 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18246 battles
  • 6,149
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

Patton. There are no ifs and buts here, Patton is simply one of the best tier X vehicles, while CAX is just good tank.

 

Despite top speed CAX is not really much faster, higher accuracy does not give it edge against Pattons superior softs stats and DPM, overall there is no contest, Patton being top 3 meds at tier X is the way to go with depression 105 meds.



xmsy09x #6 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:50 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3946 battles
  • 5
  • [NEOS1] NEOS1
  • Member since:
    12-28-2011
I don't want one of the best tier X, i want the best tier X on hulldown.

Edited by xmsy09x, 26 July 2018 - 10:50 AM.


undutchable80 #7 Posted 26 July 2018 - 11:14 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7279 battles
  • 1,752
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

View Postxmsy09x, on 26 July 2018 - 10:50 AM, said:

I don't want one of the best tier X, i want the best tier X on hulldown.

 

Hulldown the turret of the CAX is better

Eokokok #8 Posted 26 July 2018 - 12:23 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18246 battles
  • 6,149
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

View Postxmsy09x, on 26 July 2018 - 09:50 AM, said:

I don't want one of the best tier X, i want the best tier X on hulldown.

 

Then get SConq...

 

View Postundutchable80, on 26 July 2018 - 10:14 AM, said:

Hulldown the turret of the CAX is better

 

Only if both are played poorly - stationary hulldown like its 2013. In every other situation Patton will work better since it can get less exposure with superior soft stats, and in every other situation it will be like a tier higher tank with usable UFP and better DPM.



xmsy09x #9 Posted 26 July 2018 - 12:45 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3946 battles
  • 5
  • [NEOS1] NEOS1
  • Member since:
    12-28-2011
i was thinking about the S.conq but is an heavy tank and i don't know how it works

Eokokok #10 Posted 26 July 2018 - 01:14 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18246 battles
  • 6,149
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

You go somewhere you can hide your hull or at least LFP on a slope, you point and click everything till they die, then you relocate. Only downside is typical heavy speed around 32-34 around the map, but it has gun that makes all the meds look like poor derpfaces.

 

If not, well, pretty much all of the depression based 105 meds are good enough to not be useless in tier X games, but Patton is the only one that can do other things then sit in hull down.



undutchable80 #11 Posted 27 July 2018 - 08:47 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7279 battles
  • 1,752
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

View Postxmsy09x, on 26 July 2018 - 12:45 PM, said:

i was thinking about the S.conq but is an heavy tank and i don't know how it works

 

And the Churchill I, VII and Black Prince grind is a like a right of passage through hell, whereas the UK MT line doesnt have 3 successive crap tanks in a row...

Eokokok #12 Posted 27 July 2018 - 11:32 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18246 battles
  • 6,149
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
3 average-bad tanks though are just marginally better, since Comet is omg-nope, Cent is meh and 7/1 is again meh. Still better then HTs though, true.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users