Jump to content


ranked: unplayable


  • Please log in to reply
131 replies to this topic

HassenderZerhacker #1 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:22 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27744 battles
  • 2,459
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

what can I say... unless you have one of the unfair tanks (russians, swede TDs, maybe sconq), ranked is unplayable.

 

well done WG.

one step closer to quit.


Edited by HassenderZerhacker, 26 July 2018 - 09:23 PM.


gunslingerXXX #2 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:34 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11377 battles
  • 2,233
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
Type 5?

HassenderZerhacker #3 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:38 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27744 battles
  • 2,459
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View PostgunslingerXXX, on 26 July 2018 - 09:34 PM, said:

Type 5?

 

working on it

but this unfair piece of crap is certainly effective, ok, add type 5 to the list


Edited by HassenderZerhacker, 26 July 2018 - 09:42 PM.


RamRaid90 #4 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:41 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22415 battles
  • 6,674
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

The game is unplayable tonight

 

Wish they would stop asking you to win for missions. Most of these bots cant even find the W key.



Nov_A #5 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:41 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 49067 battles
  • 4,088
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    02-28-2012
What rank are you at and how much have you considered to play GC?

HassenderZerhacker #6 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27744 battles
  • 2,459
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View PostNov_A, on 26 July 2018 - 09:41 PM, said:

What rank are you at and how much have you considered to play GC?

 

can't even get the first rank

15 battles so far

 

8 defeats in a row with the E100, this tank feels like a tier 8

 

and yes, every battle there is a GC conqueror, it does over 1000 damage to me

it's a bad piece of unfair crap.

unfortunately, I didn't know this when I started to play wot back in 2015, so now I'm stuck with german arties.

haven't got the GW E100 yet

 

I wish they wouldn't allow arty in ranked or at least disregard the stun assist XP


Edited by HassenderZerhacker, 26 July 2018 - 09:46 PM.


kaneloon #7 Posted 26 July 2018 - 09:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28652 battles
  • 1,892
  • [OBLIC] OBLIC
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

I have to start yet, I wonder if the kranvagn will be useful.

As in my unlimited wisdom I chose the swedish heavies and the japonese meds ... :bajan:

 

Edit : ok ... 


Edited by kaneloon, 26 July 2018 - 09:56 PM.


Warzey #8 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:01 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57348 battles
  • 961
  • [GOOFY] GOOFY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011
So basically you're mad because your particular tier 10 tank is not very good in ranked? I mean if a tank is bad at hull down shootout you shouldn't play it in ranked.

HassenderZerhacker #9 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:01 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27744 battles
  • 2,459
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

16th battle: 2442 damage with the Leopard I.

3rd last in the winning team (i.e. 13th).

what in hell ?

 

first 6 places: 4x Obj (907,140, 430U, 277), then IS-7 then Type 5....

 

perfect illustration of what I said before.



Rati_Festa #10 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44321 battles
  • 1,624
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012

I just took a 2 week break from the game, played 2 hours of ranked as this is supposed to be the pinnacle of the game. All that grinding I did to play this sh1t. I'll be having another 2 week break or longer... 

 

This game is a mess and is more frustrating than fun, its quite something to behold how WG have managed to screw it up really, I've managed to break my addiction to grinding/wn8 improving ( which I am very glad of ). Usually when I take a break I'm itching to play.. I'm itching to play something else now.



HassenderZerhacker #11 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:05 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27744 battles
  • 2,459
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View PostWarzey, on 26 July 2018 - 10:01 PM, said:

So basically you're mad because your particular tier 10 tank is not very good in ranked? I mean if a tank is bad at hull down shootout you shouldn't play it in ranked.

 

I'm mad because WG obviously favors some tech trees over others and privileges newer tanks over older tanks.

 

I would have appreciated WG telling me in advance, when I was playing tier 3, which tech trees would be ok at high tiers and which would suck.

And no, it wasn't possible to tell at the time.

Same as with arty, I'm stuck wit the germans but I would like to have the murricans or the brits.

 

It's ok to be given the choice of what tanks are technically better suited to play in ranked.

Yes, I would choose tanks that are good at hul down tactics.

But no, I don't have any options for hull down tanks, because WG screwed up my tech tree, and no, I don't have the time to quickly grind up to Obj 430U.

It's just so unfair.


Edited by HassenderZerhacker, 26 July 2018 - 10:08 PM.


Nov_A #12 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:07 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 49067 battles
  • 4,088
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    02-28-2012

View PostHassenderZerhacker, on 26 July 2018 - 10:01 PM, said:

16th battle: 2442 damage with the Leopard I.

3rd last in the winning team (i.e. 13th).

what in hell ?

 

Check the XP distribution. Sniping and camping is now way less rewarding, making tanks like the StrV or Leo a bad choice. You get way more XP by fighting in close combat and dealing damage were most of your listed tanks are good at.

deivio82 #13 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:12 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 49552 battles
  • 156
  • [LDTO] LDTO
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012
they kill game quicker with this mode ;)  go go go 

HassenderZerhacker #14 Posted 26 July 2018 - 10:22 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27744 battles
  • 2,459
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View PostNov_A, on 26 July 2018 - 10:07 PM, said:

 

Check the XP distribution. Sniping and camping is now way less rewarding, making tanks like the StrV or Leo a bad choice. You get way more XP by fighting in close combat and dealing damage were most of your listed tanks are good at.

 

I'm sure you will now follow up with a recommendation in the German tech tree ?
 

17th battle: 4478 damage with the E100.

close defeat.

top damage in the team but 5th by XP.

9th defeat in a row with E100

 

and most importantly: still no rank.

 

19th battle:

finally a win with E100 (10th battle with that tank)

3693 damage. shot only gold except one HE.

I shot 7 shots, all hit, all HEAT shots penetrated.

I got premium time right now due to campaign missions, so I lost "only" 8067 gold, otherwise it would have been 27526, inspite of all HEAT shots penetrating.

 

Rank I was awarded, so I quit for today.

 

This was very hard work.

I can only advise anyone to get their hands on one of the unfair tanks for high tier battles.


 

Edited by NickMustaine, 28 July 2018 - 01:51 PM.


Captain_Kremen0 #15 Posted 26 July 2018 - 11:01 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37581 battles
  • 1,562
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011
Don't play ranked?

Negativvv #16 Posted 26 July 2018 - 11:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9586 battles
  • 1,131
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015
I take it pure gold is mandatory in Ranked? :P

TardWurst #17 Posted 26 July 2018 - 11:04 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41602 battles
  • 372
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    02-23-2011
I have not played a single battle of this mode yet. And again I feel like I have already won the whole thing - I feel sorry for people playing this crapfor rewards worth like couple of euros and raging like lunatics.

Negativvv #18 Posted 26 July 2018 - 11:07 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9586 battles
  • 1,131
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

View PostTardWurst, on 26 July 2018 - 11:04 PM, said:

I have not played a single battle of this mode yet. And again I feel like I have already won the whole thing - I feel sorry for people playing this crapfor rewards worth like couple of euros and raging like lunatics.

I have a BC and a T57 for Ranked.

 

I'm a total T10 noob so I'll enjoy all the post game pm abuse :trollface:



Homer_J #19 Posted 26 July 2018 - 11:12 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29674 battles
  • 31,334
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

Played one.

 

Batchat 155 58

 

Glacier

 

Terrible lag probably due to my 3/4G connection.

 

Won

 

Came 6th by exp - 1st five were Batty 25t, T110E4, E100, IS-7, IS-7

 

Forgot to load Dinger ammo so made nearly 24k profit.

 

Rank 1



vcristi #20 Posted 27 July 2018 - 04:37 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 68029 battles
  • 487
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011

View PostHassenderZerhacker, on 26 July 2018 - 08:44 PM, said:

 

can't even get the first rank

15 battles so far

 

8 defeats in a row with the E100, this tank feels like a tier 8

 

and yes, every battle there is a GC conqueror, it does over 1000 damage to me

it's a bad piece of unfair crap.

unfortunately, I didn't know this when I started to play wot back in 2015, so now I'm stuck with german arties.

haven't got the GW E100 yet

 

I wish they wouldn't allow arty in ranked or at least disregard the stun assist XP

 

WOW. You, one of the most fervent arty lover, now wish for arty not to be in the game? Why the sudden change bro? Arty ruined your gaming experience or what?

 

Also is not WG fault that you choose to grind bad/uncompetitive tanks. It is just your fault.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users