Jump to content


Anyone else miss old tier 10 430?


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

xx984 #1 Posted 27 July 2018 - 03:30 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 56358 battles
  • 2,613
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

questions in the title,

 

for some reason I never used to play it much, but now it's gone I want to play it loads ):



arthurwellsley #2 Posted 27 July 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 52122 battles
  • 3,181
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View Postxx984, on 27 July 2018 - 02:30 PM, said:

questions in the title,

 

for some reason I never used to play it much, but now it's gone I want to play it loads ):

 

Rose tinted spectacles?

Object 430 old style was never as good as Object 140.

Object 430 old style was never as good as T62A

Object 430 old style was never as good as Object 907.

Object 430 old style was better than the pre buff version of the 121.

All four cousins were better than any of the "NATO" mediums at tier X.

 

I do not have an Object 907, but I have the four tech tree cousins 140, T62A, 430, and 121. Some days I would do the daily double on all four. The 430 was never as good as the 140 or T62A, although it was better than the 121. The only reason for wishing for the old 430 over and above the new 430U, is that the 430U feels heavy and cumbersome compared to the 140 and the T62A if you play the three of them in a row, but the armour does sort of make up for it. If you only had the new 430U and not the 140, T62A or 121 I do not feel that you would miss the old 430.


Edited by arthurwellsley, 27 July 2018 - 04:16 PM.


malaquey #3 Posted 27 July 2018 - 03:40 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30205 battles
  • 202
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013
430U is way better. old 430 had the dpm but horrendous gun handling.

fwhaatpiraat #4 Posted 27 July 2018 - 03:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 49179 battles
  • 841
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View Postmalaquey, on 27 July 2018 - 03:40 PM, said:

430U is way better. old 430 had the dpm but horrendous gun handling.

As horrendous as nato meds, oh no!



DuncaN_101 #5 Posted 27 July 2018 - 04:06 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 53706 battles
  • 2,022
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

@ arthur ... on paper it wasn't as good as its brothers no but for some reason i liked playing the 430 loads more then the other 2. as for my preformance in any of them ... it was about the same (piss poor)

 

so yes i would have liked 2 keep my old 430 but that aint gonna happen



vasilinhorulezz #6 Posted 27 July 2018 - 04:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 27 July 2018 - 03:47 PM, said:

As horrendous as nato meds, oh no!

 

You haven't played the Patton, I assume?

xx984 #7 Posted 27 July 2018 - 07:46 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 56358 battles
  • 2,613
  • [SHEKL] SHEKL
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
when i say i miss it, I dont miss it because of its stats or whatever, I myself have more fun playing in tanks like the Leo and STB compared to the 430U, even though they are statistically worse

fwhaatpiraat #8 Posted 27 July 2018 - 08:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 49179 battles
  • 841
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 27 July 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

 

You haven't played the Patton, I assume?

 

Before or after the multiple series of buffs?

 

Spoiler

 



malaquey #9 Posted 27 July 2018 - 08:37 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30205 battles
  • 202
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 27 July 2018 - 02:47 PM, said:

As horrendous as nato meds, oh no!

 

apart from patton it was still better than leo and amx.

 

but everybody knows Leo is OP so yeah.

 

 



LordMuffin #10 Posted 27 July 2018 - 09:24 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48529 battles
  • 11,254
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011
I miss it because I miss the old pre-butchered SU-101




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users