Jump to content


Low tier arty dispersion vs high tier......

wot wargaming arty dispersion low tier

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

deathtron #1 Posted 28 July 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2895 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018

Dispersion!!!???

 

Why do arty dispersion differ so much compare a low tier vs a high tier.......

Dispersion only get better the higher the tier is......?????

Only "tank" type where it is a huge difference on the same caliber and type of gun...seems a bit odd i think.....

 

No consistency WOT, fix please!!

 

Regards// Tron 



BonjiOrongji #2 Posted 28 July 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40906 battles
  • 1,198
  • [RMBLE] RMBLE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011
yeah fix it please and give high tier artys the same guns as the low tier ones !

 



Sfinski #3 Posted 28 July 2018 - 04:13 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31728 battles
  • 2,639
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

Yeah fix please and remove arties. 

 

 



wEight_Tanker #4 Posted 28 July 2018 - 04:34 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7538 battles
  • 459
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016

View PostBonjiOrongji, on 28 July 2018 - 03:46 PM, said:

yeah fix it please and give high tier artys the same guns as the low tier ones !

 

 

They already have after the Arty nerf...

PervyPastryPuffer #5 Posted 28 July 2018 - 04:38 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31029 battles
  • 1,901
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

With the numerous arty whine threads popping up on a daily basis for years, it's honestly shocking WG still hasn't at least run a supertest period which didn't have artillery in it, just to see what difference removing arty would do, how it would affect the game, etc.

 

I guess they want people whining about arty because it gives the moderators something to do on this forum. :trollface:



WindSplitter1 #6 Posted 28 July 2018 - 04:58 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 16025 battles
  • 2,560
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostTankyouverymuch2, on 28 July 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

With the numerous arty whine threads popping up on a daily basis for years, it's honestly shocking WG still hasn't at least run a supertest period which didn't have artillery in it, just to see what difference removing arty would do, how it would affect the game, etc.

 

I guess they want people whining about arty because it gives the moderators something to do on this forum. :trollface:

 

Arty is fine.

Balc0ra #7 Posted 28 July 2018 - 05:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66298 battles
  • 16,316
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostTankyouverymuch2, on 28 July 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

With the numerous arty whine threads popping up on a daily basis for years, it's honestly shocking WG still hasn't at least run a supertest period which didn't have artillery in it, just to see what difference removing arty would do, how it would affect the game, etc.

 

No need for it. Their first tests showed arty prevent camping.

 

Tho as also stated by WG, it's still a class ppl have invested lots of time in. I'm sure you remember how furious ppl were over the E50 engine they gave free XP for. Imagine if you lose 3-4 full lines... vs one module? As ppl only post about the things they hate, not what they like. So shake the stick up the wrong tree and even arty lovers will come out to make even more topics I'm sure. 



BonjiOrongji #8 Posted 28 July 2018 - 05:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40906 battles
  • 1,198
  • [RMBLE] RMBLE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011

View PostwEight_Tanker, on 28 July 2018 - 04:34 PM, said:

 

They already have after the Arty nerf...

 

which nerf ? ...havent they buffed most of the arty stats and they also got a stun mechanic ?

Edited by BonjiOrongji, 28 July 2018 - 05:47 PM.


BonjiOrongji #9 Posted 28 July 2018 - 05:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40906 battles
  • 1,198
  • [RMBLE] RMBLE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 28 July 2018 - 05:39 PM, said:

 

No need for it. Their first tests showed arty prevent camping.

 

except that arty is the only reason to camp xD ... just keep saying that but i never comes true

wEight_Tanker #10 Posted 28 July 2018 - 06:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7538 battles
  • 459
  • [VI90M] VI90M
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016

View PostBonjiOrongji, on 28 July 2018 - 05:47 PM, said:

 

which nerf ? ...havent they buffed most of the arty stats and they also got a stun mechanic ?

 

All Arties, except LEFH and Seckston 1, got their penetration reduced and "Armor Piercing" rounds removed. Some High Tier arties got their damage reduced as well. T92's 240mm gun feels like 183mm regular HE round, but just a bit tougher.

PervyPastryPuffer #11 Posted 28 July 2018 - 07:45 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31029 battles
  • 1,901
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 28 July 2018 - 05:39 PM, said:

No need for it. Their first tests showed arty prevent camping.

 

Tho as also stated by WG, it's still a class ppl have invested lots of time in. I'm sure you remember how furious ppl were over the E50 engine they gave free XP for. Imagine if you lose 3-4 full lines... vs one module? As ppl only post about the things they hate, not what they like. So shake the stick up the wrong tree and even arty lovers will come out to make even more topics I'm sure. 

 

So it's like a mess we can never get out of... :(

Bordhaw #12 Posted 28 July 2018 - 11:40 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 11553 battles
  • 2,526
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostTankyouverymuch2, on 28 July 2018 - 06:45 PM, said:

 

So it's like a mess we can never get out of... :(

 

 







Also tagged with wot, wargaming, arty, dispersion, low tier

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users