Jump to content


50TP Prototype - means how WARGAMING cheated Polish players.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
36 replies to this topic

ArcadiusThePlayerPL #1 Posted 04 August 2018 - 11:40 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7301 battles
  • 13
  • Member since:
    12-20-2011

Hi,

 

8 years waiting for the Polish tank ... and how it came out? I will invite you to read the opinions of Polish players:

 

http://forum.worldof...ototyp/#topmost

 



Karasu_Hidesuke #2 Posted 04 August 2018 - 11:42 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16170 battles
  • 4,016
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

*edited*  

 

#walletclosed


Edited by Jahpero, 04 August 2018 - 03:37 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to not being in the correct language


QuattroTT #3 Posted 04 August 2018 - 11:46 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3344 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    12-25-2016
Lol wallet closed say that to the thousands of players running them around in random battles

WindSplitter1 #4 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:21 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 16646 battles
  • 2,577
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostArcadiusThePlayerPL, on 04 August 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

Hi,

 

8 years waiting for the Polish tank ... and how it came out? I will invite you to read the opinions of Polish players:

 

http://forum.worldof...ototyp/#topmost

 

 

You're assuming we speak Polish. I'm sure it's a fine language and we thank you for the invitation but as you would want us reading it, could you offer a translation?

Dava_117 #5 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:22 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20306 battles
  • 3,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

So, apparently it's not strong enought. LOL.

What did they expected, a Defender 2.0? :facepalm:

Nice to see WG not releasing totally OP premium anymore!

 

Edit

The comment "WG cheated because armour is listed as 170mm while is only the driver hatch" is fantastic! :D


Edited by Dava_117, 04 August 2018 - 12:24 PM.


DuncaN_101 #6 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:23 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 53808 battles
  • 2,056
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostWindSplitter1, on 04 August 2018 - 12:21 PM, said:

 

You're assuming we speak Polish. I'm sure it's a fine language and we thank you for the invitation but as you would want us reading it, could you offer a translation?

 

mostly this ...

 

how in the Fok are we supposed 2 read that if we're not polish?

 



Dava_117 #7 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20306 battles
  • 3,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostDuncaN_101, on 04 August 2018 - 12:23 PM, said:

 

mostly this ...

 

how in the Fok are we supposed 2 read that if we're not polish?

 

 

I used the Google translation algorithm. Sure, it's not very accurate, but you can get the point of almost all the post.

BonjiOrongji #8 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:31 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 41782 battles
  • 1,363
  • [RMBLE] RMBLE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011
okay ... lets remove the 50TP and give them the "Mauerbrechsky" instead ... hopefully this will make them happy :trollface:

WoW276 #9 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15472 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    04-28-2011
Get some skills first, then complain. This tank is not for "low experienced" players.

NUKLEAR_SLUG #10 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:36 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 30566 battles
  • 2,571
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

If WG had released Defender version 2.0 people would be crying that WG suck. Because WG released a balanced tank that isn't OP people are crying that WG suck.

 

Player logic.



WoW276 #11 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15472 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    04-28-2011

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 04 August 2018 - 11:36 AM, said:

If WG had released Defender version 2.0 people would be crying that WG suck. Because WG released a balanced tank that isn't OP people are crying that WG suck.

 

Player logic.

 

+

Tomato logic

 

 


Edited by WoW276, 04 August 2018 - 12:40 PM.


Karasu_Hidesuke #12 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:41 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16170 battles
  • 4,016
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostDava_117, on 04 August 2018 - 11:22 AM, said:

 

The comment "WG cheated because armour is listed as 170mm while is only the driver hatch" is fantastic! :D

 

Uhm.. you don't see any problems with that? Usually when stats give frontal hull armor I would assume it refers to UFP/LFP or something other than a tiny pixel sized patch of armor somewhere under the gun barrel...

Dava_117 #13 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:45 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20306 battles
  • 3,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostBrowarszky, on 04 August 2018 - 12:41 PM, said:

 

Uhm.. you don't see any problems with that? Usually when stats give frontal hull armor I would assume it refers to UFP/LFP or something other than a tiny pixel sized patch of armor somewhere under the gun barrel...

 

On the specs is stated "up to". So 170mm being the highest nominal value on the frontal plate is correct.

Also is the only useful value to know, considering UFP is at autobounce angle...



QuattroTT #14 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:46 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3344 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    12-25-2016

First some people go on about how item is unavailable to purchase, next someone speaks of how the nation emblem (checkerboard) is different i.e it has 2 on the left side like they cant make their mind up (WG). 

More people whining about the tank not being available in the store and one says he bought premium account just to get it. Next someone says how the hussar is on one side of the tank and the Polish Eagle emblem on the other "couldnt they put the hussar on both sides". Cant be asked to translate more lol



Search_Warrant #15 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:52 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27711 battles
  • 6,435
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
WG cheated nobody... you never take the armor they say as 100%. always wait for an armor model to appear before buying anything based on "armor". WG always tell you the thickest armor on the front even if its a pixel big, WG will use that.

Karasu_Hidesuke #16 Posted 04 August 2018 - 12:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16170 battles
  • 4,016
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostDava_117, on 04 August 2018 - 11:45 AM, said:

 

On the specs is stated "up to". So 170mm being the highest nominal value on the frontal plate is correct.

Also is the only useful value to know, considering UFP is at autobounce angle...

 

Well yes.. but the LFP isn't. Was the 'up to' on the news page, cause normally like at tanks.gg you only see the max value. I'm not sure if WG wanted to mislead people on purpose, but it is easy to assume that the armor is better than what it is in effect unless you start to look at the specifics. Also, this is pike nosed tank, so at least for me trying to keep the pike pointed at (one) enemy and keeping the LFP hidden has always been extra challenging.

 

Not that I cant see others doing extremely well in this tank at least when it is top tier. Don't think I seen them much in tier X matches yet.



Poerhis #17 Posted 04 August 2018 - 01:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 17036 battles
  • 213
  • [SIKA] SIKA
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011
This is stupid. The tank is better than almost any tier 8 tech tree tank, but still it isn’t good enough?

Bennie182 #18 Posted 04 August 2018 - 01:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54957 battles
  • 1,773
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostArcadiusThePlayerPL, on 04 August 2018 - 11:40 AM, said:

Hi,

 

8 years waiting for the Polish tank ... and how it came out? I will invite you to read the opinions of Polish players:

 

http://forum.worldof...ototyp/#topmost

 

would be handy if it was at least written in English, right? Google Translate will dis form what they wrote



Karasu_Hidesuke #19 Posted 04 August 2018 - 01:05 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16170 battles
  • 4,016
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostPoerhis, on 04 August 2018 - 12:03 PM, said:

This is stupid. The tank is better than almost any tier 8 tech tree tank, but still it isn’t good enough?

 

I think the MM is a factor in this, and that they have previously released tier 8 premiums that I don't know if the 50TP can beat in a fair fight. I for one don't want to spend money on a tank most of the time takes me against tier 9's and X's and Defenders.... or Chinese TD's for that matter...

Edited by Browarszky, 04 August 2018 - 01:07 PM.


Hedgehog1963 #20 Posted 04 August 2018 - 01:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51619 battles
  • 7,633
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostArcadiusThePlayerPL, on 04 August 2018 - 10:40 AM, said:

Hi,

 

8 years waiting for the Polish tank ... and how it came out? I will invite you to read the opinions of Polish players:

 

http://forum.worldof...ototyp/#topmost

 

 

Invite away, but until they speak English I'm not going to be able to read it.  Are these people uneducated?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users